人工耳蜗植入前、植入内和术后皮肤厚度的测量方法

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001
Lena Zaubitzer , Elena Schaefer , Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke , Johannes Burkart , Katrin Herrmann , Beatrice Walter , Angela Schell , Claudia Scherl , Jérôme Servais , Daniel Haeussler
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入前、植入内和术后皮肤厚度的测量方法","authors":"Lena Zaubitzer ,&nbsp;Elena Schaefer ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke ,&nbsp;Johannes Burkart ,&nbsp;Katrin Herrmann ,&nbsp;Beatrice Walter ,&nbsp;Angela Schell ,&nbsp;Claudia Scherl ,&nbsp;Jérôme Servais ,&nbsp;Daniel Haeussler","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p &lt; 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p &lt; 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/26/main.PMC9349019.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants\",\"authors\":\"Lena Zaubitzer ,&nbsp;Elena Schaefer ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke ,&nbsp;Johannes Burkart ,&nbsp;Katrin Herrmann ,&nbsp;Beatrice Walter ,&nbsp;Angela Schell ,&nbsp;Claudia Scherl ,&nbsp;Jérôme Servais ,&nbsp;Daniel Haeussler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p &lt; 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p &lt; 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/26/main.PMC9349019.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的探讨在人工耳蜗植入前、植入中、植入后耳后皮肤厚度的测量方法,以评估人工耳蜗外磁铁的最佳受力。方法采用三种不同的方法测量83例接受CI的患者耳后皮肤厚度。在术前、术后以及术中CT图像上测量厚度。由外科医生选择的磁铁类别记录在植入体打开时和第一次随访期间。对不同的蒙皮厚度测量值以及蒙皮厚度与磁体强度类别之间的相关性进行了分析。结果随访前仅6例患者需要更换磁体。虽然三种测量方法的绝对厚度中位数存在显著差异(p <0.0001),其厚度值呈极显著相关(Pearson’s r = 0.457-0.585;p & lt;0.01)。此外,磁体强度与手术前、手术后和手术中确定的皮瓣厚度显著相关。术中针法与磁体强度的相关性最低。结论三种测量方法均为理想磁力的确定提供了基础。然而,特别有趣的是术前和术后的CT测量。前者能够早期评估所需的磁场强度,从而及时提供术后供应,而后者有助于估计在后续护理期间需要降低磁场强度和早期接通的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants

Objective

This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).

Methods

The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.

Results

Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.

Conclusion

All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comparative utility of vestibular function tests in patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction Co-infection with Neisseria mucosa in a patient with tuberculous otitis media A case report on a rare case of primary tuberculous otitis media The application of the strip-shaped cymba conchae orthosis in the nonsurgical correction of complex auricular deformity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1