Lena Zaubitzer , Elena Schaefer , Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke , Johannes Burkart , Katrin Herrmann , Beatrice Walter , Angela Schell , Claudia Scherl , Jérôme Servais , Daniel Haeussler
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入前、植入内和术后皮肤厚度的测量方法","authors":"Lena Zaubitzer , Elena Schaefer , Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke , Johannes Burkart , Katrin Herrmann , Beatrice Walter , Angela Schell , Claudia Scherl , Jérôme Servais , Daniel Haeussler","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/26/main.PMC9349019.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants\",\"authors\":\"Lena Zaubitzer , Elena Schaefer , Elisabeth Wallhaeuser-Franke , Johannes Burkart , Katrin Herrmann , Beatrice Walter , Angela Schell , Claudia Scherl , Jérôme Servais , Daniel Haeussler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2021.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/26/main.PMC9349019.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的探讨在人工耳蜗植入前、植入中、植入后耳后皮肤厚度的测量方法,以评估人工耳蜗外磁铁的最佳受力。方法采用三种不同的方法测量83例接受CI的患者耳后皮肤厚度。在术前、术后以及术中CT图像上测量厚度。由外科医生选择的磁铁类别记录在植入体打开时和第一次随访期间。对不同的蒙皮厚度测量值以及蒙皮厚度与磁体强度类别之间的相关性进行了分析。结果随访前仅6例患者需要更换磁体。虽然三种测量方法的绝对厚度中位数存在显著差异(p <0.0001),其厚度值呈极显著相关(Pearson’s r = 0.457-0.585;p & lt;0.01)。此外,磁体强度与手术前、手术后和手术中确定的皮瓣厚度显著相关。术中针法与磁体强度的相关性最低。结论三种测量方法均为理想磁力的确定提供了基础。然而,特别有趣的是术前和术后的CT测量。前者能够早期评估所需的磁场强度,从而及时提供术后供应,而后者有助于估计在后续护理期间需要降低磁场强度和早期接通的可行性。
Methods for measuring pre-, intra-, and postoperative skin thickness for cochlear implants
Objective
This study was conducted to determine whether there is a reliable method for measuring the thickness of the retroauricular skin before, during, and after cochlear implantation, which allows the assessment of the optimal force of the external magnet of the cochlear implant (CI).
Methods
The retroauricular skin thickness of 83 patients who received a CI was measured using three different methods. The thickness was measured on pre- and postoperative CT images, as well as intraoperatively. The magnet category chosen by the surgeon was recorded when the implant was switched on and during the first follow-up visit. Correlation analyses were performed on the different skin thickness measurements and between the skin thickness and magnet strength categories.
Results
Only six patients required an exchange of the magnet until the follow-up. Although the median absolute thickness differed significantly between the three measures (p < 0.0001), their thickness values showed highly significant correlations (Pearson's r = 0.457–0.585; p < 0.01). In addition, magnet strength, was significantly correlated with the flap thickness determined pre-, post-, and during surgery. The lowest correlation with magnet strength was found in the intraoperative needle method.
Conclusion
All three measurements methods provided a suitable base for determining the ideal magnetic force. However, of particular interest were the pre- and postoperative CT measurements. The first enabled the early assessment of the required magnetic strength and thus a timely postoperative supply, whereas the latter helped to estimate the need for magnetic strength reduction during follow-up care and the feasibility of an early swith-on.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.