在为精神疾病患者提供服务的收容所进行组织健康素养评估。

Q2 Medicine Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-08 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20220615-01
Lindsay Rosenfeld, Anna Miller, Suzanne Garverich, Margaret Guyer, Rachel Steiner, Alisa K Lincoln
{"title":"在为精神疾病患者提供服务的收容所进行组织健康素养评估。","authors":"Lindsay Rosenfeld, Anna Miller, Suzanne Garverich, Margaret Guyer, Rachel Steiner, Alisa K Lincoln","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20220615-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy research and practice are constantly evolving. Recent inquiry has highlighted the burdensome literacy demands faced by people with serious mental illness (SMI). Systems, organizational operations, and structures can play a role in decreasing literacy demand, thereby reducing unnecessary challenges for people with SMI. Brief Description of Activity: An organizational health literacy assessment was conducted to explore literacy demands in one mental health shelter and revealed best practice action steps for improving the literacy environment.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The assessment included an exploration of the shelter environment using The Health Literacy Environment Activity Packet, First Impressions & Walking Interview, and a commonly used shelter document using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literacy demands of the shelter environment and a frequently used document exceeded the literacy skills of people with SMI. Environment assessment revealed environmental facilitators (e.g., welcoming atmosphere) and barriers (e.g., unclear signage). Document assessment also revealed facilitating factors and barriers. SMOG scores ranged from 11.25 to 11.80 (median: 11.38), meaning 11th to 12th grade-level reading skills are required to understand, use, and take action on the document's content. A SAM score of 50% (adequate) and a CDC Index score of 42.1 (revise and improve) reveal materials contain both facilitating factors (e.g., chunked sections) and barriers (e.g., jargon, mismatched graphics) to use.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>The mismatch between system demands and the literacy skills of people with SMI is more profound than that of the general United States population. Organizational health literacy assessments are achievable and useful for both immediate and long-term action aimed at understanding and improving the organizational health literacy of mental health spaces. Further work is needed to explore the role of behavioral health services in addressing the institutional and programmatic literacy demands that inhibit treatment and recovery. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e167-e174.</b>] Plain Language Summary: An organizational health literacy assessment reveals how system demands can be changed to better serve intended users. Engaging in mental health, recovery, and treatment services requires complex literacy skills. Generally, the U.S. adult population does not have the skills to meet such demands, and this is especially true among public mental health service users.</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"e167-e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/62/hlpr0722rosenfeldbp-prt.PMC9272573.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performing an Organizational Health Literacy Assessment in a Shelter Serving People with Mental Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Rosenfeld, Anna Miller, Suzanne Garverich, Margaret Guyer, Rachel Steiner, Alisa K Lincoln\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/24748307-20220615-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy research and practice are constantly evolving. Recent inquiry has highlighted the burdensome literacy demands faced by people with serious mental illness (SMI). Systems, organizational operations, and structures can play a role in decreasing literacy demand, thereby reducing unnecessary challenges for people with SMI. Brief Description of Activity: An organizational health literacy assessment was conducted to explore literacy demands in one mental health shelter and revealed best practice action steps for improving the literacy environment.</p><p><strong>Implementation: </strong>The assessment included an exploration of the shelter environment using The Health Literacy Environment Activity Packet, First Impressions & Walking Interview, and a commonly used shelter document using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literacy demands of the shelter environment and a frequently used document exceeded the literacy skills of people with SMI. Environment assessment revealed environmental facilitators (e.g., welcoming atmosphere) and barriers (e.g., unclear signage). Document assessment also revealed facilitating factors and barriers. SMOG scores ranged from 11.25 to 11.80 (median: 11.38), meaning 11th to 12th grade-level reading skills are required to understand, use, and take action on the document's content. A SAM score of 50% (adequate) and a CDC Index score of 42.1 (revise and improve) reveal materials contain both facilitating factors (e.g., chunked sections) and barriers (e.g., jargon, mismatched graphics) to use.</p><p><strong>Lessons learned: </strong>The mismatch between system demands and the literacy skills of people with SMI is more profound than that of the general United States population. Organizational health literacy assessments are achievable and useful for both immediate and long-term action aimed at understanding and improving the organizational health literacy of mental health spaces. Further work is needed to explore the role of behavioral health services in addressing the institutional and programmatic literacy demands that inhibit treatment and recovery. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2022;6(3):e167-e174.</b>] Plain Language Summary: An organizational health literacy assessment reveals how system demands can be changed to better serve intended users. Engaging in mental health, recovery, and treatment services requires complex literacy skills. Generally, the U.S. adult population does not have the skills to meet such demands, and this is especially true among public mental health service users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e167-e174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/62/hlpr0722rosenfeldbp-prt.PMC9272573.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220615-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20220615-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康素养研究和实践在不断发展。最近的调查强调了严重精神疾病(SMI)患者所面临的繁重的扫盲需求。系统、组织运作和结构可以在降低扫盲需求方面发挥作用,从而减少重症精神病患者面临的不必要的挑战。活动简介:我们开展了一项组织健康扫盲评估,以探索一家精神健康庇护所的扫盲需求,并揭示出改善扫盲环境的最佳实践行动步骤:评估包括使用《健康素养环境活动包》、《第一印象与步行访谈》对庇护所的环境进行探索,并使用《简易障眼法》(SMOG)、《材料适用性评估》(SAM)和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)指数对庇护所的常用文件进行评估:结果:避难所环境和常用文件的识字要求超出了 SMI 患者的识字能力。环境评估显示了环境的促进因素(如温馨的氛围)和障碍因素(如不清晰的标识)。文件评估也揭示了促进因素和障碍。SMOG得分在11.25至11.80之间(中位数:11.38),这意味着需要11至12年级水平的阅读能力才能理解、使用文件内容并采取行动。SAM 得分为 50%(足够),CDC 指数得分为 42.1(修订和改进),这表明材料中既有促进使用的因素(如分块章节),也有使用的障碍(如专业术语、不匹配的图形):经验教训:系统需求与 SMI 患者读写能力之间的不匹配比美国普通人群更为严重。组织健康素养评估是可以实现的,而且对于了解和改善精神健康空间的组织健康素养的近期和长期行动都是有用的。还需要进一步开展工作,探索行为健康服务在解决阻碍治疗和康复的机构和项目扫盲需求中的作用。[HLRP:健康素养研究与实践。2022;6(3):e167-e174.] 原文摘要:组织健康素养评估揭示了如何改变系统需求,以更好地服务预期用户。参与心理健康、康复和治疗服务需要复杂的扫盲技能。一般来说,美国成年人并不具备满足这些需求的技能,这一点在公共心理健康服务用户中尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performing an Organizational Health Literacy Assessment in a Shelter Serving People with Mental Illness.

Background: Health literacy research and practice are constantly evolving. Recent inquiry has highlighted the burdensome literacy demands faced by people with serious mental illness (SMI). Systems, organizational operations, and structures can play a role in decreasing literacy demand, thereby reducing unnecessary challenges for people with SMI. Brief Description of Activity: An organizational health literacy assessment was conducted to explore literacy demands in one mental health shelter and revealed best practice action steps for improving the literacy environment.

Implementation: The assessment included an exploration of the shelter environment using The Health Literacy Environment Activity Packet, First Impressions & Walking Interview, and a commonly used shelter document using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Index.

Results: The literacy demands of the shelter environment and a frequently used document exceeded the literacy skills of people with SMI. Environment assessment revealed environmental facilitators (e.g., welcoming atmosphere) and barriers (e.g., unclear signage). Document assessment also revealed facilitating factors and barriers. SMOG scores ranged from 11.25 to 11.80 (median: 11.38), meaning 11th to 12th grade-level reading skills are required to understand, use, and take action on the document's content. A SAM score of 50% (adequate) and a CDC Index score of 42.1 (revise and improve) reveal materials contain both facilitating factors (e.g., chunked sections) and barriers (e.g., jargon, mismatched graphics) to use.

Lessons learned: The mismatch between system demands and the literacy skills of people with SMI is more profound than that of the general United States population. Organizational health literacy assessments are achievable and useful for both immediate and long-term action aimed at understanding and improving the organizational health literacy of mental health spaces. Further work is needed to explore the role of behavioral health services in addressing the institutional and programmatic literacy demands that inhibit treatment and recovery. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2022;6(3):e167-e174.] Plain Language Summary: An organizational health literacy assessment reveals how system demands can be changed to better serve intended users. Engaging in mental health, recovery, and treatment services requires complex literacy skills. Generally, the U.S. adult population does not have the skills to meet such demands, and this is especially true among public mental health service users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Relation Between Health Literacy, Infodemic, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study. Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics. Get Health'e': A Pilot Test of a Digital Health Literacy Intervention for Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1