进行自带“设备”(BYOD)临床研究的考虑。

Q1 Computer Science Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2022-07-04 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000525080
Charmaine Demanuele, Cynthia Lokker, Krishna Jhaveri, Pirinka Georgiev, Emre Sezgin, Cindy Geoghegan, Kelly H Zou, Elena Izmailova, Marie McCarthy
{"title":"进行自带“设备”(BYOD)临床研究的考虑。","authors":"Charmaine Demanuele,&nbsp;Cynthia Lokker,&nbsp;Krishna Jhaveri,&nbsp;Pirinka Georgiev,&nbsp;Emre Sezgin,&nbsp;Cindy Geoghegan,&nbsp;Kelly H Zou,&nbsp;Elena Izmailova,&nbsp;Marie McCarthy","doi":"10.1159/000525080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be prone to biases and artifacts, e.g., white coat hypertension, and not representative of the data in free-living conditions. Modern digital health technologies equipped with multi-modal sensors combine different data streams to derive comprehensive endpoints that are important to study participants and are clinically meaningful. Used for data collection in clinical trials, they can be deployed as provisioned products where technology is given at study start or in a bring your own \"device\" (BYOD) manner where participants use their technologies to generate study data.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The BYOD option has the potential to be more user-friendly, allowing participants to use technologies that they are familiar with, ensuring better participant compliance, and potentially reducing the bias that comes with introducing new technologies. However, this approach presents different technical, operational, regulatory, and ethical challenges to study teams. For example, BYOD data can be more heterogeneous, and recruiting historically underrepresented populations with limited access to technology and the internet can be challenging. Despite the rapid increase in digital health technologies for clinical and healthcare research, BYOD use in clinical trials is limited, and regulatory guidance is still evolving.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>We offer considerations for academic researchers, drug developers, and patient advocacy organizations on the design and deployment of BYOD models in clinical research. These considerations address: (1) early identification and engagement with internal and external stakeholders; (2) study design including informed consent and recruitment strategies; (3) outcome, endpoint, and technology selection; (4) data management including compliance and data monitoring; (5) statistical considerations to meet regulatory requirements. We believe that this article acts as a primer, providing insights into study design and operational requirements to ensure the successful implementation of BYOD clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"47-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/02/dib-0006-0047.PMC9294934.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own \\\"Device\\\" (BYOD) Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Charmaine Demanuele,&nbsp;Cynthia Lokker,&nbsp;Krishna Jhaveri,&nbsp;Pirinka Georgiev,&nbsp;Emre Sezgin,&nbsp;Cindy Geoghegan,&nbsp;Kelly H Zou,&nbsp;Elena Izmailova,&nbsp;Marie McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000525080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be prone to biases and artifacts, e.g., white coat hypertension, and not representative of the data in free-living conditions. Modern digital health technologies equipped with multi-modal sensors combine different data streams to derive comprehensive endpoints that are important to study participants and are clinically meaningful. Used for data collection in clinical trials, they can be deployed as provisioned products where technology is given at study start or in a bring your own \\\"device\\\" (BYOD) manner where participants use their technologies to generate study data.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The BYOD option has the potential to be more user-friendly, allowing participants to use technologies that they are familiar with, ensuring better participant compliance, and potentially reducing the bias that comes with introducing new technologies. However, this approach presents different technical, operational, regulatory, and ethical challenges to study teams. For example, BYOD data can be more heterogeneous, and recruiting historically underrepresented populations with limited access to technology and the internet can be challenging. Despite the rapid increase in digital health technologies for clinical and healthcare research, BYOD use in clinical trials is limited, and regulatory guidance is still evolving.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>We offer considerations for academic researchers, drug developers, and patient advocacy organizations on the design and deployment of BYOD models in clinical research. These considerations address: (1) early identification and engagement with internal and external stakeholders; (2) study design including informed consent and recruitment strategies; (3) outcome, endpoint, and technology selection; (4) data management including compliance and data monitoring; (5) statistical considerations to meet regulatory requirements. We believe that this article acts as a primer, providing insights into study design and operational requirements to ensure the successful implementation of BYOD clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"47-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/02/dib-0006-0047.PMC9294934.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:数字健康技术作为临床研究中数据收集的新工具正引起人们的关注。他们提出了与临床数据收集相比的替代方法,临床数据收集通常产生参与者的生理,行为和功能快照,这可能容易产生偏差和人为因素,例如,白大褂高血压,并且不代表自由生活条件下的数据。配备多模态传感器的现代数字卫生技术将不同的数据流结合起来,得出对研究参与者很重要且具有临床意义的综合端点。用于临床试验中的数据收集,它们可以作为预先配置的产品部署,在研究开始时提供技术,或者以自带“设备”(BYOD)的方式部署,参与者使用他们的技术生成研究数据。总结:BYOD选项有可能更加用户友好,允许参与者使用他们熟悉的技术,确保参与者更好地遵守,并有可能减少引入新技术带来的偏见。然而,这种方法对研究团队提出了不同的技术、操作、管理和伦理挑战。例如,BYOD数据可能更加异构,并且招募历史上代表性不足的人口,这些人口使用技术和互联网的机会有限,可能具有挑战性。尽管用于临床和医疗保健研究的数字健康技术快速增长,但BYOD在临床试验中的使用有限,监管指导仍在不断发展。关键信息:我们为学术研究人员、药物开发人员和患者倡导组织提供了在临床研究中设计和部署BYOD模式的考虑。这些考虑涉及:(1)早期识别和参与内部和外部利益相关者;(2)研究设计,包括知情同意和招募策略;(3)结局、终点和技术选择;(4)数据管理,包括合规和数据监控;(5)符合监管要求的统计考虑。我们相信这篇文章可以作为一个引子,为研究设计和操作要求提供见解,以确保BYOD临床研究的成功实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own "Device" (BYOD) Clinical Studies.

Background: Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be prone to biases and artifacts, e.g., white coat hypertension, and not representative of the data in free-living conditions. Modern digital health technologies equipped with multi-modal sensors combine different data streams to derive comprehensive endpoints that are important to study participants and are clinically meaningful. Used for data collection in clinical trials, they can be deployed as provisioned products where technology is given at study start or in a bring your own "device" (BYOD) manner where participants use their technologies to generate study data.

Summary: The BYOD option has the potential to be more user-friendly, allowing participants to use technologies that they are familiar with, ensuring better participant compliance, and potentially reducing the bias that comes with introducing new technologies. However, this approach presents different technical, operational, regulatory, and ethical challenges to study teams. For example, BYOD data can be more heterogeneous, and recruiting historically underrepresented populations with limited access to technology and the internet can be challenging. Despite the rapid increase in digital health technologies for clinical and healthcare research, BYOD use in clinical trials is limited, and regulatory guidance is still evolving.

Key messages: We offer considerations for academic researchers, drug developers, and patient advocacy organizations on the design and deployment of BYOD models in clinical research. These considerations address: (1) early identification and engagement with internal and external stakeholders; (2) study design including informed consent and recruitment strategies; (3) outcome, endpoint, and technology selection; (4) data management including compliance and data monitoring; (5) statistical considerations to meet regulatory requirements. We believe that this article acts as a primer, providing insights into study design and operational requirements to ensure the successful implementation of BYOD clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The State of Digital Biomarkers in Mental Health. The Imperative of Voice Data Collection in Clinical Trials. eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Detecting Longitudinal Trends between Passively Collected Phone Use and Anxiety among College Students. Video Assessment to Detect Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1