{"title":"HILIC-HPLC-ELSD法定量分析的相对校正因子计算——以巴戟天8种低聚果糖为例","authors":"Lihong Zhou, Hui Ni, Linlin Zhang, Wenyong Wu, Tengqian Zhang, Qi Su, Jing Zhou, Huali Long, Jinjun Hou, Jiyu Gong, Wanying Wu","doi":"10.1155/2022/8022473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1-GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> was validated with good linearity (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95-105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, <i>Morinda officinalis</i> and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.</p>","PeriodicalId":14974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda Officinalis</i> as a Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lihong Zhou, Hui Ni, Linlin Zhang, Wenyong Wu, Tengqian Zhang, Qi Su, Jing Zhou, Huali Long, Jinjun Hou, Jiyu Gong, Wanying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8022473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1-GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of <i>Morinda officinalis</i> was validated with good linearity (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95-105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, <i>Morinda officinalis</i> and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9391178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study.
Objective: Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD.
Methods: Using eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products.
Results: It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1-GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis was validated with good linearity (R2 > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95-105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, Morinda officinalis and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides.
Conclusion: The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry publishes papers reporting methods and instrumentation for chemical analysis, and their application to real-world problems. Articles may be either practical or theoretical.
Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to):
Separation
Spectroscopy
Mass spectrometry
Chromatography
Analytical Sample Preparation
Electrochemical analysis
Hyphenated techniques
Data processing
As well as original research, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.