经皮神经电刺激、熏衣草芳香疗法和无药生理性分娩对新生儿和产妇预后的影响比较研究。

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Minoo Movahedi, Maede Ebrahimian, Milad Saeedy, Nooshin Tavoosi
{"title":"经皮神经电刺激、熏衣草芳香疗法和无药生理性分娩对新生儿和产妇预后的影响比较研究。","authors":"Minoo Movahedi,&nbsp;Maede Ebrahimian,&nbsp;Milad Saeedy,&nbsp;Nooshin Tavoosi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The complications of normal vaginal delivery (NVD) are one of the issues that researchers have been discussing today and various ways to reduce these outcomes have been presented. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), the aromatherapy of Lavandula and physiologic delivery without medication on NVD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 women that were candidates of NVD. The information related had been registered in the Iranian clinical trial registration system with the code IRCT20210501051151N1 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/56014). Patients were divided into three groups of Lavandula, TENS, and physiologic delivery. Postpartum pain, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and labor duration were compared in groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labor pain was significantly less in TENS and Lavandula than in the physiologic group, respectively (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of labor duration and maternal and fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of TENS and Lavandula aromatherapy are useful methods for reducing pain in patients undergoing NVD, but using TENS method is better than Lavandula method, and on the other hand, there are no differences between groups as maternal and neonatal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14352,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"206-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301182/pdf/ijppp0014-0206.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, the aromatherapy of Lavandula and physiologic delivery without medication on the neonatal and maternal outcome of patients.\",\"authors\":\"Minoo Movahedi,&nbsp;Maede Ebrahimian,&nbsp;Milad Saeedy,&nbsp;Nooshin Tavoosi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The complications of normal vaginal delivery (NVD) are one of the issues that researchers have been discussing today and various ways to reduce these outcomes have been presented. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), the aromatherapy of Lavandula and physiologic delivery without medication on NVD outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 women that were candidates of NVD. The information related had been registered in the Iranian clinical trial registration system with the code IRCT20210501051151N1 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/56014). Patients were divided into three groups of Lavandula, TENS, and physiologic delivery. Postpartum pain, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and labor duration were compared in groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labor pain was significantly less in TENS and Lavandula than in the physiologic group, respectively (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of labor duration and maternal and fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of TENS and Lavandula aromatherapy are useful methods for reducing pain in patients undergoing NVD, but using TENS method is better than Lavandula method, and on the other hand, there are no differences between groups as maternal and neonatal complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"206-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301182/pdf/ijppp0014-0206.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:正常阴道分娩(NVD)的并发症是研究人员今天一直在讨论的问题之一,并提出了各种方法来减少这些结果。在本研究中,我们旨在比较经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、薰衣草香薰疗法和无药物生理给药对NVD结局的影响。方法:这项随机临床试验对150名NVD候选者进行了研究。相关信息已在伊朗临床试验注册系统注册,代码为IRCT20210501051151N1 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/56014)。患者分为Lavandula、TENS和生理分娩三组。组间比较产后疼痛、产妇和新生儿结局及分娩时间。结果:与生理组相比,TENS和Lavandula分别显著减轻了分娩疼痛(p结论:TENS和Lavandula芳香疗法是减轻NVD患者疼痛的有效方法,但TENS方法优于Lavandula方法,另一方面,两组之间在产妇和新生儿并发症方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, the aromatherapy of Lavandula and physiologic delivery without medication on the neonatal and maternal outcome of patients.

Objectives: The complications of normal vaginal delivery (NVD) are one of the issues that researchers have been discussing today and various ways to reduce these outcomes have been presented. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), the aromatherapy of Lavandula and physiologic delivery without medication on NVD outcomes.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 women that were candidates of NVD. The information related had been registered in the Iranian clinical trial registration system with the code IRCT20210501051151N1 (https://www.irct.ir/trial/56014). Patients were divided into three groups of Lavandula, TENS, and physiologic delivery. Postpartum pain, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and labor duration were compared in groups.

Results: Labor pain was significantly less in TENS and Lavandula than in the physiologic group, respectively (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of labor duration and maternal and fetal outcomes.

Conclusion: The use of TENS and Lavandula aromatherapy are useful methods for reducing pain in patients undergoing NVD, but using TENS method is better than Lavandula method, and on the other hand, there are no differences between groups as maternal and neonatal complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 modulation of glutamate effects on cortical neuronal synapses: implications for HIV-1-associated neuropathogenesis. Acute paracetamol toxicity-induced inflammatory and oxidative effects are relieved by Aleppo galls: a novel experimental study. Evaluation of PD-L1 antigen expression using immunohistochemistry technique in medullary thyroid carcinoma samples. Effectiveness of yoga on Ewing's battery autonomic function test: cross-sectional study. NAD+ administration profoundly decreases UVC-induced skin damage by attenuating oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage and apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1