单侧阻生犬的骨骼和牙槽骨尺寸:锥束计算机断层扫描研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Oral Research Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.26650/eor.2022911925
Sanjit Kumar Sar, Mandeep Singh, Ankit Sharma, Payal Sharma, Monis Raza
{"title":"单侧阻生犬的骨骼和牙槽骨尺寸:锥束计算机断层扫描研究。","authors":"Sanjit Kumar Sar,&nbsp;Mandeep Singh,&nbsp;Ankit Sharma,&nbsp;Payal Sharma,&nbsp;Monis Raza","doi":"10.26650/eor.2022911925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements of subjects with unilateral impacted canine versus the non-impacted contralateral side using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>30 CBCTs with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines (Buccal=15, Palatal=15) were selected. Skeletal and dentoalveolar variables (alveolar ridge height of incisors, dentoalveolar height, angulations of incisors and canines, basal lateral width and premolar width) were compared between the impacted and the contralateral sides. Independent t-test was used to compare the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the mean basal lateral width between the impacted (28.25±1.83 mm) and non-impacted (31.64±2.18 mm) sides. Premolar width was significantly lower on the impacted side (p<0.05). The canines exhibited significantly greater angulations on the impacted side compared to the nonimpacted side. The basal lateral width was significantly higher in the buccal subgroup (29.03±1.65mm) compared to palatal (27.48±1.70mm) on the impacted side. The intra-operator reliability was found to be high (0.99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences were seen in canine angulation, premolar width and basal lateral width between impacted vs. non impacted sides. Basal lateral width was higher in buccal impacted cases compared to palatal.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"56 2","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/b3/eor-056-074.PMC9377773.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and dentoalveolar dimensions in unilateral impacted canines: a cone beam computed tomography study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjit Kumar Sar,&nbsp;Mandeep Singh,&nbsp;Ankit Sharma,&nbsp;Payal Sharma,&nbsp;Monis Raza\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/eor.2022911925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements of subjects with unilateral impacted canine versus the non-impacted contralateral side using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>30 CBCTs with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines (Buccal=15, Palatal=15) were selected. Skeletal and dentoalveolar variables (alveolar ridge height of incisors, dentoalveolar height, angulations of incisors and canines, basal lateral width and premolar width) were compared between the impacted and the contralateral sides. Independent t-test was used to compare the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the mean basal lateral width between the impacted (28.25±1.83 mm) and non-impacted (31.64±2.18 mm) sides. Premolar width was significantly lower on the impacted side (p<0.05). The canines exhibited significantly greater angulations on the impacted side compared to the nonimpacted side. The basal lateral width was significantly higher in the buccal subgroup (29.03±1.65mm) compared to palatal (27.48±1.70mm) on the impacted side. The intra-operator reliability was found to be high (0.99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences were seen in canine angulation, premolar width and basal lateral width between impacted vs. non impacted sides. Basal lateral width was higher in buccal impacted cases compared to palatal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"74-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/b3/eor-056-074.PMC9377773.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022911925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022911925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)比较单侧患牙与非患牙对侧的骨骼和牙槽测量结果。材料和方法:选择30例单侧阻生上颌犬(颊15例,腭15例)的cbct。对阻生侧和对侧的骨骼和牙槽骨变量(门牙牙槽嵴高度、牙槽骨高度、门牙和犬牙的角度、基侧宽度和前磨牙宽度)进行比较。采用独立t检验对变量进行比较。结果:患牙侧基侧平均宽度(28.25±1.83 mm)与非患牙侧基侧平均宽度(31.64±2.18 mm)差异有统计学意义。结论:阻生侧与非阻生侧在犬牙成角、前磨牙宽度和基侧宽度上存在显著差异。颊侧阻生病例基底侧宽高于腭侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Skeletal and dentoalveolar dimensions in unilateral impacted canines: a cone beam computed tomography study.

Purpose: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements of subjects with unilateral impacted canine versus the non-impacted contralateral side using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: 30 CBCTs with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines (Buccal=15, Palatal=15) were selected. Skeletal and dentoalveolar variables (alveolar ridge height of incisors, dentoalveolar height, angulations of incisors and canines, basal lateral width and premolar width) were compared between the impacted and the contralateral sides. Independent t-test was used to compare the variables.

Results: There was a significant difference in the mean basal lateral width between the impacted (28.25±1.83 mm) and non-impacted (31.64±2.18 mm) sides. Premolar width was significantly lower on the impacted side (p<0.05). The canines exhibited significantly greater angulations on the impacted side compared to the nonimpacted side. The basal lateral width was significantly higher in the buccal subgroup (29.03±1.65mm) compared to palatal (27.48±1.70mm) on the impacted side. The intra-operator reliability was found to be high (0.99%).

Conclusion: Significant differences were seen in canine angulation, premolar width and basal lateral width between impacted vs. non impacted sides. Basal lateral width was higher in buccal impacted cases compared to palatal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study. Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of (6)-shogaol on alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography, electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length determination on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of c-shaped canal morphology in mandibular premolar teeth The effect of three different primary teeth rotary instrument systems on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1