肾功能不全对左心室辅助装置后预后的影响:一项系统综述。

International Journal of Heart Failure Pub Date : 2020-10-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36628/ijhf.2020.0030
Michel Ibrahim, Garly Rushler Saint Croix, Spencer Lacy, Sandra Chaparro
{"title":"肾功能不全对左心室辅助装置后预后的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Michel Ibrahim,&nbsp;Garly Rushler Saint Croix,&nbsp;Spencer Lacy,&nbsp;Sandra Chaparro","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2020.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity in patients with advanced heart failure who may benefit from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The effect of preoperative renal dysfunction on clinical outcomes after LVAD implantation remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes post-LVAD in patients with and without renal dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes in patients with and without renal dysfunction who underwent LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 5,229 potentially eligible studies. We included 7 studies reporting on 26,652 patients. Patients with renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) (n=4,630) had increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.39-3.51; p<0.01) compared to patients with normal renal function (GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) (n=22,019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with renal dysfunction have increased mortality after LVAD implantation when compared to patients with normal renal function. GFR can be used to risk stratify patients and guide decision making prior to LVAD therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14058,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"3 1","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/bc/ijhf-3-69.PMC9536719.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Renal Dysfunction on Outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Michel Ibrahim,&nbsp;Garly Rushler Saint Croix,&nbsp;Spencer Lacy,&nbsp;Sandra Chaparro\",\"doi\":\"10.36628/ijhf.2020.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity in patients with advanced heart failure who may benefit from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The effect of preoperative renal dysfunction on clinical outcomes after LVAD implantation remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes post-LVAD in patients with and without renal dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes in patients with and without renal dysfunction who underwent LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 5,229 potentially eligible studies. We included 7 studies reporting on 26,652 patients. Patients with renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) (n=4,630) had increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.39-3.51; p<0.01) compared to patients with normal renal function (GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) (n=22,019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with renal dysfunction have increased mortality after LVAD implantation when compared to patients with normal renal function. GFR can be used to risk stratify patients and guide decision making prior to LVAD therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"69-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/bc/ijhf-3-69.PMC9536719.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景和目的:肾功能不全是晚期心力衰竭患者的常见合并症,可从左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗中获益。术前肾功能不全对LVAD植入后临床结果的影响尚不明确。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较有肾功能不全和无肾功能不全患者lvad后的结果。方法:检索PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase数据库,比较有肾功能障碍和无肾功能障碍的晚期心力衰竭患者行左心室辅助器植入的结果。全因死亡率的主要结局报告为随机效应风险比(RR), 95%可信区间(CI)。结果:我们的搜索产生了5229项可能符合条件的研究。我们纳入了7项研究,报告了26,652例患者。肾功能不全(肾小球滤过率[GFR] 2)患者(n= 4630)全因死亡风险增加(RR, 2.21;95% ci, 1.39-3.51;p60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (n=22,019)。结论:与肾功能正常的患者相比,LVAD植入后肾功能不全的患者死亡率增高。GFR可用于患者风险分层和指导LVAD治疗前的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Renal Dysfunction on Outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review.

Background and objectives: Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity in patients with advanced heart failure who may benefit from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. The effect of preoperative renal dysfunction on clinical outcomes after LVAD implantation remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes post-LVAD in patients with and without renal dysfunction.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing outcomes in patients with and without renal dysfunction who underwent LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Our search yielded 5,229 potentially eligible studies. We included 7 studies reporting on 26,652 patients. Patients with renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (n=4,630) had increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.39-3.51; p<0.01) compared to patients with normal renal function (GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (n=22,019).

Conclusions: Patients with renal dysfunction have increased mortality after LVAD implantation when compared to patients with normal renal function. GFR can be used to risk stratify patients and guide decision making prior to LVAD therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Epidemiologic Profile and Predictors of Readmission of Heart Failure: Unveiling Opportunities for Improved Care. In-hospital Outcomes of Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations With Acute Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Management of the Underlying Etiologies and Comorbidities of Heart Failure. Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Advanced and Acute Heart Failure. Association of Blood Pressure and Prognosis of Heart Failure With Systolic Dysfunction: A Myth That Should Be Solved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1