José Diego Marques Santos, Sharyle Fowler, Derek Jennings, Colten Brass, Linda Porter, Robert Porter, Rhonda Sanderson, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez
{"title":"加拿大萨斯喀彻温省的一项回顾性队列研究:第一民族和患有炎症性肠病的普通人群之间的卫生保健利用差异","authors":"José Diego Marques Santos, Sharyle Fowler, Derek Jennings, Colten Brass, Linda Porter, Robert Porter, Rhonda Sanderson, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous people in Canada often face barriers to access specialized care, with limited data in evaluating health care utilization among Indigenous people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to compare health care utilization between First Nations patients and those in the general population diagnosed with IBD in Saskatchewan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a patient-oriented, population-based, retrospective cohort study by linking administrative health databases of Saskatchewan between fiscal years 1998/99 and 2017/18. We designed and completed this study in partnership with Indigenous patients and family advocates. We applied a validated algorithm to identify IBD incident cases and then used the self-declared First Nations status variable to divide those cases. We applied a 1:5 ratio for age and sex matching and used Cox proportional models to assess associations. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We created a matched cohort with 696 IBD incident cases: 116 First Nations patients and 580 patients in the general population. We observed differences between the groups for IBD-specific hospital admissions (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), IBD-related hospital admissions (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), medication claims for IBD (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 5-aminosalicylic acid claims (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.71) adjusting by rural or urban residence and diagnosis type. There were no significant differences in the hazard rate of outpatient gastroenterology visits (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.41), colonoscopies (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41) and surgeries for IBD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.64).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We identified that First Nations patients diagnosed with IBD had a higher rate of hospital admissions owing to IBD than patients in the general population diagnosed with IBD. We also found an inverse association between First Nations status and having prescription medication claims for IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":" ","pages":"E964-E970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/0c/cmajo.20220118.PMC9633056.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health care utilization differences between First Nations people and the general population with inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study from Saskatchewan, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"José Diego Marques Santos, Sharyle Fowler, Derek Jennings, Colten Brass, Linda Porter, Robert Porter, Rhonda Sanderson, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.9778/cmajo.20220118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous people in Canada often face barriers to access specialized care, with limited data in evaluating health care utilization among Indigenous people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to compare health care utilization between First Nations patients and those in the general population diagnosed with IBD in Saskatchewan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a patient-oriented, population-based, retrospective cohort study by linking administrative health databases of Saskatchewan between fiscal years 1998/99 and 2017/18. We designed and completed this study in partnership with Indigenous patients and family advocates. We applied a validated algorithm to identify IBD incident cases and then used the self-declared First Nations status variable to divide those cases. We applied a 1:5 ratio for age and sex matching and used Cox proportional models to assess associations. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We created a matched cohort with 696 IBD incident cases: 116 First Nations patients and 580 patients in the general population. We observed differences between the groups for IBD-specific hospital admissions (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), IBD-related hospital admissions (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), medication claims for IBD (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 5-aminosalicylic acid claims (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.71) adjusting by rural or urban residence and diagnosis type. There were no significant differences in the hazard rate of outpatient gastroenterology visits (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.41), colonoscopies (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41) and surgeries for IBD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.64).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We identified that First Nations patients diagnosed with IBD had a higher rate of hospital admissions owing to IBD than patients in the general population diagnosed with IBD. We also found an inverse association between First Nations status and having prescription medication claims for IBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E964-E970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e3/0c/cmajo.20220118.PMC9633056.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:加拿大土著居民经常面临获得专业护理的障碍,在评估患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的土著居民的卫生保健利用方面的数据有限。我们的目的是比较萨斯喀彻温省第一民族患者和被诊断为IBD的普通人群之间的医疗保健利用情况。方法:通过连接萨斯喀彻温省1998/99财政年度至2017/18财政年度的行政卫生数据库,开展了一项以患者为导向、基于人群的回顾性队列研究。我们与土著患者和家庭倡导者合作设计并完成了这项研究。我们应用一种经过验证的算法来识别IBD事件病例,然后使用自我声明的第一民族状态变量来划分这些病例。我们采用1:5的比例进行年龄和性别匹配,并使用Cox比例模型来评估相关性。报告了风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:我们创建了696例IBD事件的匹配队列:116名原住民患者和580名普通人群患者。我们观察到IBD特异性住院率(HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75)、IBD相关住院率(HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.01)、IBD药物索赔(HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65)和5-氨基水杨酸索赔(HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.71)根据农村或城市居住和诊断类型进行调整的组间差异。门诊胃肠病学就诊(HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.41)、结肠镜检查(HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41)和IBD手术(HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.64)的危险率无显著差异。解释:我们发现被诊断为IBD的第一民族患者比被诊断为IBD的普通人群患者有更高的IBD住院率。我们还发现原住民身份和处方药物治疗IBD之间呈负相关。
Health care utilization differences between First Nations people and the general population with inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study from Saskatchewan, Canada.
Background: Indigenous people in Canada often face barriers to access specialized care, with limited data in evaluating health care utilization among Indigenous people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to compare health care utilization between First Nations patients and those in the general population diagnosed with IBD in Saskatchewan.
Methods: We conducted a patient-oriented, population-based, retrospective cohort study by linking administrative health databases of Saskatchewan between fiscal years 1998/99 and 2017/18. We designed and completed this study in partnership with Indigenous patients and family advocates. We applied a validated algorithm to identify IBD incident cases and then used the self-declared First Nations status variable to divide those cases. We applied a 1:5 ratio for age and sex matching and used Cox proportional models to assess associations. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.
Results: We created a matched cohort with 696 IBD incident cases: 116 First Nations patients and 580 patients in the general population. We observed differences between the groups for IBD-specific hospital admissions (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.75), IBD-related hospital admissions (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), medication claims for IBD (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65) and 5-aminosalicylic acid claims (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.71) adjusting by rural or urban residence and diagnosis type. There were no significant differences in the hazard rate of outpatient gastroenterology visits (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.90-1.41), colonoscopies (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41) and surgeries for IBD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.64).
Interpretation: We identified that First Nations patients diagnosed with IBD had a higher rate of hospital admissions owing to IBD than patients in the general population diagnosed with IBD. We also found an inverse association between First Nations status and having prescription medication claims for IBD.