面部枪伤是自己造成的还是别人造成的更致命?

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1177/19433875211039919
Kevin C Lee, Brendan W Wu, Sung-Kiang Chuang
{"title":"面部枪伤是自己造成的还是别人造成的更致命?","authors":"Kevin C Lee, Brendan W Wu, Sung-Kiang Chuang","doi":"10.1177/19433875211039919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoral and submental projectile entry points may be less fatal than other facial entry points due to the indirect access to the intracranial structures and the protection offered by the intervening maxillofacial complex. Because intraoral and submental trajectories are almost always present in the setting of attempted suicide, this study sought to determine if intent (self-harm versus other-harm) influenced mortality in facial gunshot wound (GSW) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with a diagnosis of a facial fracture secondary to firearm injury were included in the study sample. The primary predictor was self-harm. Secondary predictors were derived from patient, injury, and hospitalization characteristics. The study outcome was death. Univariate time to event analyses were conducted for all study predictors. A multivariate regression model for mortality was created using all relevant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 668 facial GSW injuries, of which 19.3% were attributed to self-harm. Self-inflicted GSWs were more likely to involve the mandible (58.9 vs 46.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), ZMC/maxilla (47.3 vs 32.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and intracranial cavity (48.1 vs 22.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The overall mortality rate was 7.3%, and the mean time to death was 2.2 days. After controlling for pertinent covariates, the risk of mortality was independently decreased with mandibular injury (HR = 0.36, P = 0.03). However, mortality was increased by self-harm intent (HR = 3.94, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and intracranial involvement (HR = 11.24, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with a pattern of intraoral and submental entry points, self-inflicted facial GSWs demonstrated higher rates of mandibular injury. Despite this finding, self-harm injuries still carried a higher incidence of intracranial injury and a greater independent risk of mortality. Our results refute any notion that the mechanism and trajectory of self-inflicted GSWs is less fatal.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647373/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Facial Gunshot Wounds More Fatal When They Are Self-Inflicted or Other-Inflicted?\",\"authors\":\"Kevin C Lee, Brendan W Wu, Sung-Kiang Chuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19433875211039919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoral and submental projectile entry points may be less fatal than other facial entry points due to the indirect access to the intracranial structures and the protection offered by the intervening maxillofacial complex. Because intraoral and submental trajectories are almost always present in the setting of attempted suicide, this study sought to determine if intent (self-harm versus other-harm) influenced mortality in facial gunshot wound (GSW) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with a diagnosis of a facial fracture secondary to firearm injury were included in the study sample. The primary predictor was self-harm. Secondary predictors were derived from patient, injury, and hospitalization characteristics. The study outcome was death. Univariate time to event analyses were conducted for all study predictors. A multivariate regression model for mortality was created using all relevant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 668 facial GSW injuries, of which 19.3% were attributed to self-harm. Self-inflicted GSWs were more likely to involve the mandible (58.9 vs 46.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), ZMC/maxilla (47.3 vs 32.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and intracranial cavity (48.1 vs 22.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The overall mortality rate was 7.3%, and the mean time to death was 2.2 days. After controlling for pertinent covariates, the risk of mortality was independently decreased with mandibular injury (HR = 0.36, P = 0.03). However, mortality was increased by self-harm intent (HR = 3.94, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and intracranial involvement (HR = 11.24, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with a pattern of intraoral and submental entry points, self-inflicted facial GSWs demonstrated higher rates of mandibular injury. Despite this finding, self-harm injuries still carried a higher incidence of intracranial injury and a greater independent risk of mortality. Our results refute any notion that the mechanism and trajectory of self-inflicted GSWs is less fatal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9647373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211039919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875211039919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究设计:这是一项2014年全国急诊科样本(NEDS)的回顾性队列研究。目的:口腔内和颏下抛射点可能比其他面部入口点更致命,因为它们间接进入颅内结构,并由中间的颌面复合体提供保护。由于口内和精神下轨迹几乎总是存在于企图自杀的情况下,本研究试图确定意图(自我伤害与他人伤害)是否影响面部枪伤(GSW)患者的死亡率。方法:所有诊断为继发于火器伤的面部骨折的患者被纳入研究样本。主要的预测因素是自残。次要预测因子来自患者、损伤和住院特征。研究结果是死亡。对所有研究预测因子进行单变量时间-事件分析。使用所有相关预测因子建立了死亡率的多变量回归模型。结果:最终样本包括668例面部GSW伤,其中19.3%为自残。自我造成的GSWs更容易累及下颌骨(58.9比46.0%,P < 0.01)、ZMC/上颌(47.3比32.5%,P < 0.01)和颅内腔(48.1比22.6%,P < 0.01)。总死亡率为7.3%,平均死亡时间为2.2 d。在控制相关协变量后,下颌骨损伤的死亡风险独立降低(HR = 0.36, P = 0.03)。然而,自残意图(HR = 3.94, P < 0.01)和颅内累及(HR = 11.24, P < 0.01)会增加死亡率。结论:与口腔内和颏下进入点的模式一致,自我造成的面部GSWs显示出更高的下颌损伤率。尽管有这一发现,自残伤害仍然具有更高的颅内损伤发生率和更大的独立死亡风险。我们的研究结果驳斥了任何关于自我造成的GSWs的机制和轨迹不那么致命的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Facial Gunshot Wounds More Fatal When They Are Self-Inflicted or Other-Inflicted?

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS).

Objective: Intraoral and submental projectile entry points may be less fatal than other facial entry points due to the indirect access to the intracranial structures and the protection offered by the intervening maxillofacial complex. Because intraoral and submental trajectories are almost always present in the setting of attempted suicide, this study sought to determine if intent (self-harm versus other-harm) influenced mortality in facial gunshot wound (GSW) patients.

Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of a facial fracture secondary to firearm injury were included in the study sample. The primary predictor was self-harm. Secondary predictors were derived from patient, injury, and hospitalization characteristics. The study outcome was death. Univariate time to event analyses were conducted for all study predictors. A multivariate regression model for mortality was created using all relevant predictors.

Results: The final sample included 668 facial GSW injuries, of which 19.3% were attributed to self-harm. Self-inflicted GSWs were more likely to involve the mandible (58.9 vs 46.0%, P < 0.01), ZMC/maxilla (47.3 vs 32.5%, P < 0.01), and intracranial cavity (48.1 vs 22.6%, P < 0.01). The overall mortality rate was 7.3%, and the mean time to death was 2.2 days. After controlling for pertinent covariates, the risk of mortality was independently decreased with mandibular injury (HR = 0.36, P = 0.03). However, mortality was increased by self-harm intent (HR = 3.94, P < 0.01) and intracranial involvement (HR = 11.24, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Consistent with a pattern of intraoral and submental entry points, self-inflicted facial GSWs demonstrated higher rates of mandibular injury. Despite this finding, self-harm injuries still carried a higher incidence of intracranial injury and a greater independent risk of mortality. Our results refute any notion that the mechanism and trajectory of self-inflicted GSWs is less fatal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Landmarks and Branching Patterns of the Greater Auricular Nerve. Revision Surgery With Refixation After Mandibular Fractures. A Single Center Experience: A Retrospective Study Over 10-Years Period on Mandible Fractures. Comparing Current Practice Habits for Treatment of Subcondylar Fracture Among Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons. Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1