每周紫杉醇联合或不联合磷酸雌二醇治疗进展性、转移性、激素难治性前列腺癌的II期随机试验

William R. Berry, James W. Hathorn, Shaker R. Dakhil, David M. Loesch, Don V. Jackson, Mary Ann Gregurich, Jennifer K. Newcomb-Fernandez, Lina Asmar
{"title":"每周紫杉醇联合或不联合磷酸雌二醇治疗进展性、转移性、激素难治性前列腺癌的II期随机试验","authors":"William R. Berry,&nbsp;James W. Hathorn,&nbsp;Shaker R. Dakhil,&nbsp;David M. Loesch,&nbsp;Don V. Jackson,&nbsp;Mary Ann Gregurich,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Newcomb-Fernandez,&nbsp;Lina Asmar","doi":"10.3816/CGC.2004.n.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study was conducted to determine the similarity of response rates and safety produced by weekly paclitaxel with or without oral estramustine in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Between December 1998 and December 1999, 163 patients were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of paclitaxel 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 2, 9, and 16 plus estramustine 280 mg orally 3 times a day on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15- 17, or to receive paclitaxel 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> alone on days 1, 8, and 15. Objective response was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) maintained for 4 weeks with stable or improved performance status. Response rates included 37 partial responses for paclitaxel/estramustine (47%) and 22 partial responses for paclitaxel (27%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Median duration of response was 15.1 months for paclitaxel/estramustine and 15.5 months for paclitaxel; median survival was 16.1 months and 13.1 months, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.049). Common toxicities for both treatments included neutropenia, gastrointestinal events, neuropathy, and asthenia. Thromboembolic events were more frequent in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm (no prophylactic anticoagulants). The rate of PSA decline for paclitaxel/estramustine was almost 2 times that of paclitaxel (47% vs. 27%), with acceptable toxicity. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival was not significant for treatment arm (<em>P</em> = 0.08). Although the incidence of thromboembolic events appeared to be increased in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm, the addition of estramustine was responsible for a 20% increase in the rate of PSA decline. Neither treatment arm had significant impact on quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate quality of life questionnaire. This study produced encouraging data; further studies of paclitaxel/estramustine are recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87076,"journal":{"name":"Clinical prostate cancer","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CGC.2004.n.020","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase II Randomized Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel with or Without Estramustine Phosphate in Progressive, Metastatic, Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer\",\"authors\":\"William R. Berry,&nbsp;James W. Hathorn,&nbsp;Shaker R. Dakhil,&nbsp;David M. Loesch,&nbsp;Don V. Jackson,&nbsp;Mary Ann Gregurich,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Newcomb-Fernandez,&nbsp;Lina Asmar\",\"doi\":\"10.3816/CGC.2004.n.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study was conducted to determine the similarity of response rates and safety produced by weekly paclitaxel with or without oral estramustine in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Between December 1998 and December 1999, 163 patients were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of paclitaxel 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 2, 9, and 16 plus estramustine 280 mg orally 3 times a day on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15- 17, or to receive paclitaxel 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> alone on days 1, 8, and 15. Objective response was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) maintained for 4 weeks with stable or improved performance status. Response rates included 37 partial responses for paclitaxel/estramustine (47%) and 22 partial responses for paclitaxel (27%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Median duration of response was 15.1 months for paclitaxel/estramustine and 15.5 months for paclitaxel; median survival was 16.1 months and 13.1 months, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.049). Common toxicities for both treatments included neutropenia, gastrointestinal events, neuropathy, and asthenia. Thromboembolic events were more frequent in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm (no prophylactic anticoagulants). The rate of PSA decline for paclitaxel/estramustine was almost 2 times that of paclitaxel (47% vs. 27%), with acceptable toxicity. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival was not significant for treatment arm (<em>P</em> = 0.08). Although the incidence of thromboembolic events appeared to be increased in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm, the addition of estramustine was responsible for a 20% increase in the rate of PSA decline. Neither treatment arm had significant impact on quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate quality of life questionnaire. This study produced encouraging data; further studies of paclitaxel/estramustine are recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical prostate cancer\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 104-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CGC.2004.n.020\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical prostate cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540035211700713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical prostate cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540035211700713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

本研究旨在确定在转移性激素难治性前列腺癌患者中,每周紫杉醇联合或不联合口服雌二醇产生的缓解率和安全性的相似性。在1998年12月至1999年12月期间,163名患者随机接受28天周期的紫杉醇100 mg/m2治疗,第2、9和16天加上雌二醇280 mg,每天口服3次,第1-3、8-10和15- 17天,或单独接受紫杉醇100 mg/m2治疗,第1、8和15天。客观缓解的定义是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)下降≥50%并维持4周,表现状态稳定或改善。缓解率包括37例紫杉醇/雌二醇部分缓解(47%)和22例紫杉醇部分缓解(27%;P & lt;0.01)。中位反应持续时间紫杉醇/雌二醇组为15.1个月,紫杉醇组为15.5个月;中位生存期分别为16.1个月和13.1个月(P = 0.049)。两种治疗的常见毒性包括中性粒细胞减少、胃肠道事件、神经病变和虚弱。血栓栓塞事件在紫杉醇/雌二醇组(无预防性抗凝剂)更频繁。紫杉醇/雌二醇组PSA下降率几乎是紫杉醇组的2倍(47%对27%),毒性可接受。治疗组影响生存的预后因素的多因素分析无统计学意义(P = 0.08)。尽管在紫杉醇/雌二醇组中血栓栓塞事件的发生率似乎有所增加,但加入雌二醇可使PSA下降率增加20%。通过癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺生活质量问卷测量,两个治疗组对生活质量均无显著影响。这项研究得出了令人鼓舞的数据;建议进一步研究紫杉醇/雌二醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phase II Randomized Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel with or Without Estramustine Phosphate in Progressive, Metastatic, Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

This study was conducted to determine the similarity of response rates and safety produced by weekly paclitaxel with or without oral estramustine in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Between December 1998 and December 1999, 163 patients were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 2, 9, and 16 plus estramustine 280 mg orally 3 times a day on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15- 17, or to receive paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 alone on days 1, 8, and 15. Objective response was defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) maintained for 4 weeks with stable or improved performance status. Response rates included 37 partial responses for paclitaxel/estramustine (47%) and 22 partial responses for paclitaxel (27%; P < 0.01). Median duration of response was 15.1 months for paclitaxel/estramustine and 15.5 months for paclitaxel; median survival was 16.1 months and 13.1 months, respectively (P = 0.049). Common toxicities for both treatments included neutropenia, gastrointestinal events, neuropathy, and asthenia. Thromboembolic events were more frequent in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm (no prophylactic anticoagulants). The rate of PSA decline for paclitaxel/estramustine was almost 2 times that of paclitaxel (47% vs. 27%), with acceptable toxicity. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting survival was not significant for treatment arm (P = 0.08). Although the incidence of thromboembolic events appeared to be increased in the paclitaxel/estramustine arm, the addition of estramustine was responsible for a 20% increase in the rate of PSA decline. Neither treatment arm had significant impact on quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate quality of life questionnaire. This study produced encouraging data; further studies of paclitaxel/estramustine are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features and Body Composition in Men with Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study Examining Differences by Race Management of Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Recommendations of a Multidisciplinary Panel of Experts from South America The Etiology of Prostate Cancer Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Future Directions for Translational Science Revisiting the Role of p53 in Prostate Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1