W Cairns S Smith, Christine M Smith, Ian A Cree, Ruprendra S Jadhav, Murdo Macdonald, Vijay K Edward, Linda Oskam, Stella van Beers, Paul Klatser
{"title":"利用分子和免疫学方法了解麻风分枝杆菌传播的方法:来自MILEP2研究的结果。","authors":"W Cairns S Smith, Christine M Smith, Ian A Cree, Ruprendra S Jadhav, Murdo Macdonald, Vijay K Edward, Linda Oskam, Stella van Beers, Paul Klatser","doi":"10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current strategy for leprosy control using case detection and treatment has greatly reduced the prevalence of leprosy, but has had no demonstrable effect on interrupting transmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three leprosy endemic communities in India were recruited, examined, and followed up sequentially over 2 yrs using nasal swabs and saliva collections. The nasal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of M. leprae and the saliva was assayed for anti-M. leprae IgA.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Only 1.6% of 2552 nasal swabs were PCR positive, and 68% of saliva samples were positive for ML-IgA. BCG and household contact status was associated with the mucosal immune response, but not with PCR positivity. PCR positivity did not persist and most PCR positive results were in the wet season.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The findings contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of M. leprae and the possible periods of greatest likelihood of exposure and transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":14078,"journal":{"name":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","volume":" ","pages":"269-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to understanding the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae using molecular and immunological methods: results from the MILEP2 study.\",\"authors\":\"W Cairns S Smith, Christine M Smith, Ian A Cree, Ruprendra S Jadhav, Murdo Macdonald, Vijay K Edward, Linda Oskam, Stella van Beers, Paul Klatser\",\"doi\":\"10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current strategy for leprosy control using case detection and treatment has greatly reduced the prevalence of leprosy, but has had no demonstrable effect on interrupting transmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three leprosy endemic communities in India were recruited, examined, and followed up sequentially over 2 yrs using nasal swabs and saliva collections. The nasal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of M. leprae and the saliva was assayed for anti-M. leprae IgA.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Only 1.6% of 2552 nasal swabs were PCR positive, and 68% of saliva samples were positive for ML-IgA. BCG and household contact status was associated with the mucosal immune response, but not with PCR positivity. PCR positivity did not persist and most PCR positive results were in the wet season.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The findings contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of M. leprae and the possible periods of greatest likelihood of exposure and transmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"269-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1489/0020-7349(2004)72<269:AATUTT>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An approach to understanding the transmission of Mycobacterium leprae using molecular and immunological methods: results from the MILEP2 study.
Background: The current strategy for leprosy control using case detection and treatment has greatly reduced the prevalence of leprosy, but has had no demonstrable effect on interrupting transmission.
Methods: Three leprosy endemic communities in India were recruited, examined, and followed up sequentially over 2 yrs using nasal swabs and saliva collections. The nasal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of M. leprae and the saliva was assayed for anti-M. leprae IgA.
Findings: Only 1.6% of 2552 nasal swabs were PCR positive, and 68% of saliva samples were positive for ML-IgA. BCG and household contact status was associated with the mucosal immune response, but not with PCR positivity. PCR positivity did not persist and most PCR positive results were in the wet season.
Interpretation: The findings contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology of M. leprae and the possible periods of greatest likelihood of exposure and transmission.