有机化学学生在酸碱强度心理模型中使用稳定性†

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1039/D3RP00049D
Betül Demirdöğen, Isaiah Nelsen and Scott E. Lewis
{"title":"有机化学学生在酸碱强度心理模型中使用稳定性†","authors":"Betül Demirdöğen, Isaiah Nelsen and Scott E. Lewis","doi":"10.1039/D3RP00049D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The Brønsted–Lowry acid–base model is fundamental when discussing acid and base strength in organic chemistry as many of the reactions include a competing proton transfer reaction. This model requires evaluating chemical stability <em>via</em> a consideration of electronic granularity. The purpose of this study is to identify students’ mental models on acid and base strength in terms of granularity and stability. Fourteen students enrolled in organic chemistry participated in this case study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews including total case comparison tasks on stability, acidity, and basicity. Analysis of data revealed that there were four groups of students differentiated by their reasoning: (1) acid and base strength through structure without association to stability, (2) acid and base strength through electronics without association to stability, (3) acid strength associated with electronically centered stability, and (4) acid and base strength associated with electronically centered stability. This characterization can support teaching and research to promote reasoning that leads to a more consistent mental model across acid and base strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 1127-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organic chemistry students’ use of stability in mental models on acid and base strength†\",\"authors\":\"Betül Demirdöğen, Isaiah Nelsen and Scott E. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3RP00049D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The Brønsted–Lowry acid–base model is fundamental when discussing acid and base strength in organic chemistry as many of the reactions include a competing proton transfer reaction. This model requires evaluating chemical stability <em>via</em> a consideration of electronic granularity. The purpose of this study is to identify students’ mental models on acid and base strength in terms of granularity and stability. Fourteen students enrolled in organic chemistry participated in this case study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews including total case comparison tasks on stability, acidity, and basicity. Analysis of data revealed that there were four groups of students differentiated by their reasoning: (1) acid and base strength through structure without association to stability, (2) acid and base strength through electronics without association to stability, (3) acid strength associated with electronically centered stability, and (4) acid and base strength associated with electronically centered stability. This characterization can support teaching and research to promote reasoning that leads to a more consistent mental model across acid and base strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 1127-1141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/rp/d3rp00049d\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/rp/d3rp00049d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Brønsted–Lowry酸碱模型是讨论有机化学中酸碱强度的基础,因为许多反应都包括竞争性质子转移反应。该模型需要通过考虑电子粒度来评估化学稳定性。本研究的目的是从粒度和稳定性方面确定学生对酸碱强度的心理模型。14名有机化学专业的学生参与了本案例研究。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,包括稳定性、酸度和碱度的总病例比较任务。数据分析显示,有四组学生根据他们的推理进行区分:(1)通过结构的酸碱强度与稳定性无关,(2)通过电子的酸碱强度不与稳定性有关,(3)与电子中心稳定性有关的酸碱强度,以及(4)与电子中心稳定性相关的酸和碱强度。这种表征可以支持教学和研究,以促进推理,从而在酸碱强度之间建立更一致的心理模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organic chemistry students’ use of stability in mental models on acid and base strength†

The Brønsted–Lowry acid–base model is fundamental when discussing acid and base strength in organic chemistry as many of the reactions include a competing proton transfer reaction. This model requires evaluating chemical stability via a consideration of electronic granularity. The purpose of this study is to identify students’ mental models on acid and base strength in terms of granularity and stability. Fourteen students enrolled in organic chemistry participated in this case study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews including total case comparison tasks on stability, acidity, and basicity. Analysis of data revealed that there were four groups of students differentiated by their reasoning: (1) acid and base strength through structure without association to stability, (2) acid and base strength through electronics without association to stability, (3) acid strength associated with electronically centered stability, and (4) acid and base strength associated with electronically centered stability. This characterization can support teaching and research to promote reasoning that leads to a more consistent mental model across acid and base strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Guidance on the data availability statement requirement in CERP The use of mobile technology in abductive inquiry-based teaching and learning of chemical bonding Improving the teaching of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics: a systematic review with meta-analysis “I’m still here and I want them to know that”: experiences of chemists with concealable identities in undergraduate research A lack of impact of pedagogy (peer-led team learning compared with didactic instruction) on long-term student knowledge of chemical equilibrium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1