用于测量严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染中二聚体IgA抗体的血清学测定

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY Immunology & Cell Biology Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1111/imcb.12682
Zihui Wei, Fiona Angrisano, Emily M Eriksson, Ramin Mazhari, Huy Van, Shuning Zheng, Rob J Center, Irene Boo, James McMahon, Jillian Lau, Nicholas Kiernan-Walker, Shazia Ruybal-Pesántez, Ivo Mueller, Leanne J Robinson, David A Anderson, Heidi E Drummer
{"title":"用于测量严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染中二聚体IgA抗体的血清学测定","authors":"Zihui Wei,&nbsp;Fiona Angrisano,&nbsp;Emily M Eriksson,&nbsp;Ramin Mazhari,&nbsp;Huy Van,&nbsp;Shuning Zheng,&nbsp;Rob J Center,&nbsp;Irene Boo,&nbsp;James McMahon,&nbsp;Jillian Lau,&nbsp;Nicholas Kiernan-Walker,&nbsp;Shazia Ruybal-Pesántez,&nbsp;Ivo Mueller,&nbsp;Leanne J Robinson,&nbsp;David A Anderson,&nbsp;Heidi E Drummer","doi":"10.1111/imcb.12682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current serological tests cannot differentiate between total immunoglobulin A (IgA) and dimeric IgA (dIgA) associated with mucosal immunity. Here, we describe two new assays, dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-multiplex bead assay (MBA), that utilize the preferential binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component, allowing the differentiation between dIgA and monomeric IgA. dIgA responses elicited through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were measured in (i) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 74 samples (<i>n</i> = 20 individuals) from hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (ii) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 96 samples (<i>n</i> = 10 individuals) from individuals with mild COVID-19; (iii) a cross-sectional panel with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild COVID-19 (<i>n</i> = 199) and (iv) pre–COVID-19 samples (<i>n</i> = 200). The dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-MBA demonstrated a specificity for dIgA of 99% and 98.5%, respectively. Analysis of dIgA responses in the longitudinal panels revealed that 70% (ELISA) and 50% (MBA) of patients elicited a dIgA response by day 20 after PCR diagnosis with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with mild COVID-19 displayed increased levels of dIgA within the first 3 weeks after diagnosis but responses appeared to be short lived, compared with sustained IgA levels. However, in samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 we observed high and sustained levels of dIgA, up to 245 days after PCR diagnosis. Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 infections are associated with sustained levels of plasma dIgA compared with mild cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":179,"journal":{"name":"Immunology & Cell Biology","volume":"101 9","pages":"857-866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imcb.12682","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serological assays to measure dimeric IgA antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infections\",\"authors\":\"Zihui Wei,&nbsp;Fiona Angrisano,&nbsp;Emily M Eriksson,&nbsp;Ramin Mazhari,&nbsp;Huy Van,&nbsp;Shuning Zheng,&nbsp;Rob J Center,&nbsp;Irene Boo,&nbsp;James McMahon,&nbsp;Jillian Lau,&nbsp;Nicholas Kiernan-Walker,&nbsp;Shazia Ruybal-Pesántez,&nbsp;Ivo Mueller,&nbsp;Leanne J Robinson,&nbsp;David A Anderson,&nbsp;Heidi E Drummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imcb.12682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current serological tests cannot differentiate between total immunoglobulin A (IgA) and dimeric IgA (dIgA) associated with mucosal immunity. Here, we describe two new assays, dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-multiplex bead assay (MBA), that utilize the preferential binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component, allowing the differentiation between dIgA and monomeric IgA. dIgA responses elicited through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were measured in (i) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 74 samples (<i>n</i> = 20 individuals) from hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (ii) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 96 samples (<i>n</i> = 10 individuals) from individuals with mild COVID-19; (iii) a cross-sectional panel with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild COVID-19 (<i>n</i> = 199) and (iv) pre–COVID-19 samples (<i>n</i> = 200). The dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-MBA demonstrated a specificity for dIgA of 99% and 98.5%, respectively. Analysis of dIgA responses in the longitudinal panels revealed that 70% (ELISA) and 50% (MBA) of patients elicited a dIgA response by day 20 after PCR diagnosis with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with mild COVID-19 displayed increased levels of dIgA within the first 3 weeks after diagnosis but responses appeared to be short lived, compared with sustained IgA levels. However, in samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 we observed high and sustained levels of dIgA, up to 245 days after PCR diagnosis. Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 infections are associated with sustained levels of plasma dIgA compared with mild cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunology & Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\"101 9\",\"pages\":\"857-866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imcb.12682\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunology & Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imcb.12682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology & Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imcb.12682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的血清学测试无法区分与粘膜免疫相关的总免疫球蛋白A(IgA)和二聚体IgA(dIgA)。在这里,我们描述了两种新的检测方法,dIgA-ELISA和dIgA多重珠粒检测(MBA),它们利用dIgA与嵌合形式的分泌成分的优先结合,允许dIgA和单体IgA之间的分化。通过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)感染引起的dIgA反应在(i)由74个样本组成的纵向小组中进行了测量(n = 20人)来自2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)住院病例;(ii)纵向面板,由96个样品(n = 10个个体)来自患有轻度新冠肺炎的个体;(iii)具有PCR证实的患有轻度新冠肺炎的SARS-CoV-2感染的横断面小组(n = 199)和(iv)新冠肺炎前样本(n = 200)。dIgA-ELISA和dIgA-MBA对dIgA的特异性分别为99%和98.5%。对纵向面板中dIgA反应的分析显示,70%(ELISA)和50%(MBA)的患者在PCR诊断为严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染后第20天引发dIgA应答。患有轻度新冠肺炎的个体在前3天内表现出dIgA水平升高 诊断后数周,但与持续的IgA水平相比,反应似乎是短暂的。然而,在新冠肺炎住院患者的样本中,我们观察到dIgA的高水平和持续水平,高达245 在PCR诊断后几天。我们的研究结果表明,与轻度病例相比,严重的新冠肺炎感染与血浆dIgA的持续水平有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serological assays to measure dimeric IgA antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infections

Current serological tests cannot differentiate between total immunoglobulin A (IgA) and dimeric IgA (dIgA) associated with mucosal immunity. Here, we describe two new assays, dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-multiplex bead assay (MBA), that utilize the preferential binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component, allowing the differentiation between dIgA and monomeric IgA. dIgA responses elicited through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were measured in (i) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 74 samples (n = 20 individuals) from hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (ii) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 96 samples (n = 10 individuals) from individuals with mild COVID-19; (iii) a cross-sectional panel with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild COVID-19 (n = 199) and (iv) pre–COVID-19 samples (n = 200). The dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-MBA demonstrated a specificity for dIgA of 99% and 98.5%, respectively. Analysis of dIgA responses in the longitudinal panels revealed that 70% (ELISA) and 50% (MBA) of patients elicited a dIgA response by day 20 after PCR diagnosis with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with mild COVID-19 displayed increased levels of dIgA within the first 3 weeks after diagnosis but responses appeared to be short lived, compared with sustained IgA levels. However, in samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 we observed high and sustained levels of dIgA, up to 245 days after PCR diagnosis. Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 infections are associated with sustained levels of plasma dIgA compared with mild cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunology & Cell Biology
Immunology & Cell Biology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australasian Society for Immunology Incorporated (ASI) was created by the amalgamation in 1991 of the Australian Society for Immunology, formed in 1970, and the New Zealand Society for Immunology, formed in 1975. The aim of the Society is to encourage and support the discipline of immunology in the Australasian region. It is a broadly based Society, embracing clinical and experimental, cellular and molecular immunology in humans and animals. The Society provides a network for the exchange of information and for collaboration within Australia, New Zealand and overseas. ASI members have been prominent in advancing biological and medical research worldwide. We seek to encourage the study of immunology in Australia and New Zealand and are active in introducing young scientists to the discipline.
期刊最新文献
Prenatal Skin Cell Atlas reveals macrophages' role beyond immunity. The journey of young scientists in Brazil: challenges and perspectives. When academia met industry: working toward a needle-free vaccination future in the sunshine state. Issue Information Choose your own T-cell fate: creation of a narrative-based, decision-making activity to engage students in immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1