大麻使用障碍和不良心血管后果:加拿大阿尔伯塔省成年人的基于人群的回顾性队列分析。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1111/add.16337
Anees Bahji, Josh Hathaway, Denise Adams, David Crockford, E. Jennifer Edelman, Michael D. Stein, Scott B. Patten
{"title":"大麻使用障碍和不良心血管后果:加拿大阿尔伯塔省成年人的基于人群的回顾性队列分析。","authors":"Anees Bahji,&nbsp;Josh Hathaway,&nbsp;Denise Adams,&nbsp;David Crockford,&nbsp;E. Jennifer Edelman,&nbsp;Michael D. Stein,&nbsp;Scott B. Patten","doi":"10.1111/add.16337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To measure the association between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design and Setting</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a matched, population-based retrospective cohort study involving five linked administrative health databases from Alberta, Canada.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We identified participants with CUD diagnosis codes and matched them to participants without CUD codes by gender, year of birth and time of presentation to the health system. We included 29 764 pairs (<i>n</i> = 59 528 individuals in total).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>CVD events were defined by at least one incident diagnostic code within the study period (1 January 2012–31 December 2019). Covariates included comorbidity, socio-economic status, prescription medication use and health service use. Using mortality-censored Poisson regression models, we computed survival analyses for time to incident CVD stratified by CUD status. In addition, we calculated crude and stratified risk ratios (RRs) across various covariates using the Mantel–Haenszel technique.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The overall prevalence of documented CUD was 0.8%. Approximately 2.4% and 1.5% of participants in the CUD and unexposed groups experienced an incident adverse CVD event (RR = 1.57; 95% confidence interval = 1.40–1.77). CUD was significantly associated with reduced time to incident CVD event. Individuals who appeared to have greater RRs for incident CVD were those without mental health comorbidity, who had not used health-care services in the previous 6 months, who were not on prescription medications and who did not have comorbid conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Canadian adults with cannabis use disorder appear to have an approximately 60% higher risk of experiencing incident adverse cardiovascular disease events than those without cannabis use disorder.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"119 1","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16337","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis use disorder and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort analysis of adults from Alberta, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Anees Bahji,&nbsp;Josh Hathaway,&nbsp;Denise Adams,&nbsp;David Crockford,&nbsp;E. Jennifer Edelman,&nbsp;Michael D. Stein,&nbsp;Scott B. Patten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.16337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To measure the association between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design and Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a matched, population-based retrospective cohort study involving five linked administrative health databases from Alberta, Canada.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified participants with CUD diagnosis codes and matched them to participants without CUD codes by gender, year of birth and time of presentation to the health system. We included 29 764 pairs (<i>n</i> = 59 528 individuals in total).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measurements</h3>\\n \\n <p>CVD events were defined by at least one incident diagnostic code within the study period (1 January 2012–31 December 2019). Covariates included comorbidity, socio-economic status, prescription medication use and health service use. Using mortality-censored Poisson regression models, we computed survival analyses for time to incident CVD stratified by CUD status. In addition, we calculated crude and stratified risk ratios (RRs) across various covariates using the Mantel–Haenszel technique.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall prevalence of documented CUD was 0.8%. Approximately 2.4% and 1.5% of participants in the CUD and unexposed groups experienced an incident adverse CVD event (RR = 1.57; 95% confidence interval = 1.40–1.77). CUD was significantly associated with reduced time to incident CVD event. Individuals who appeared to have greater RRs for incident CVD were those without mental health comorbidity, who had not used health-care services in the previous 6 months, who were not on prescription medications and who did not have comorbid conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Canadian adults with cannabis use disorder appear to have an approximately 60% higher risk of experiencing incident adverse cardiovascular disease events than those without cannabis use disorder.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"137-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16337\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16337\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:测量大麻使用障碍(CUD)与不良心血管疾病(CVD)结果之间的关系。设计和设置:我们进行了一项匹配的、基于人群的回顾性队列研究,涉及加拿大阿尔伯塔省的五个相关行政健康数据库。参与者:我们确定了具有CUD诊断代码的参与者,并根据性别、出生年份和向卫生系统提交的时间将其与没有CUD代码的参与者进行匹配。我们包括29 764对(n = 59 总共528个人)。测量:CVD事件由研究期内至少一个事件诊断代码定义(1 2012年1月至2019年12月31日)。协变量包括共病、社会经济地位、处方药使用和医疗服务使用。使用死亡率截尾泊松回归模型,我们计算了按CUD状态分层的CVD发病时间的生存分析。此外,我们使用Mantel Haenszel技术计算了各种协变量的粗略和分层风险比(RR)。研究结果:记录的CUD的总患病率为0.8%。CUD和未暴露组中约2.4%和1.5%的参与者经历了心血管疾病不良事件(RR = 1.57;95%置信区间 = 1.40-1.77)。CUD与CVD事件发生时间的缩短显著相关。心血管疾病发生率较高的个体是那些没有心理健康共病、在过去6个月内没有使用过医疗服务、没有服用处方药和没有共病的人。结论:与没有大麻使用障碍的人相比,患有大麻使用障碍症的加拿大成年人发生不良心血管疾病事件的风险似乎高出约60%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cannabis use disorder and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort analysis of adults from Alberta, Canada

Aim

To measure the association between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.

Design and Setting

We conducted a matched, population-based retrospective cohort study involving five linked administrative health databases from Alberta, Canada.

Participants

We identified participants with CUD diagnosis codes and matched them to participants without CUD codes by gender, year of birth and time of presentation to the health system. We included 29 764 pairs (n = 59 528 individuals in total).

Measurements

CVD events were defined by at least one incident diagnostic code within the study period (1 January 2012–31 December 2019). Covariates included comorbidity, socio-economic status, prescription medication use and health service use. Using mortality-censored Poisson regression models, we computed survival analyses for time to incident CVD stratified by CUD status. In addition, we calculated crude and stratified risk ratios (RRs) across various covariates using the Mantel–Haenszel technique.

Findings

The overall prevalence of documented CUD was 0.8%. Approximately 2.4% and 1.5% of participants in the CUD and unexposed groups experienced an incident adverse CVD event (RR = 1.57; 95% confidence interval = 1.40–1.77). CUD was significantly associated with reduced time to incident CVD event. Individuals who appeared to have greater RRs for incident CVD were those without mental health comorbidity, who had not used health-care services in the previous 6 months, who were not on prescription medications and who did not have comorbid conditions.

Conclusions

Canadian adults with cannabis use disorder appear to have an approximately 60% higher risk of experiencing incident adverse cardiovascular disease events than those without cannabis use disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a peer-led emergency department behavioral intervention on non-fatal opioid overdose: 18-month outcome in the Navigator randomized controlled trial. Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task. School-based interventions targeting substance use among young people in low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review. The relationship between cannabis and nicotine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. What is the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use among women? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1