秋水仙碱预防心房颤动导管消融后复发性心律失常:单中心回顾性研究结果。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6
Kristen Bova Campbell, Stephanie Dougherty Eickman, Tracy Truong, Eric Black-Maier, Adam S. Barnett, Allen Wang, Cynthia L. Green, James P. Daubert, Robert K. Lewis, Brett D. Atwater, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Tristram D. Bahnson, Kevin L. Thomas, Kevin P. Jackson, Larry R. Jackson, Sean Pokorney, Camille Frazier-Mills, Jonathan P. Piccini
{"title":"秋水仙碱预防心房颤动导管消融后复发性心律失常:单中心回顾性研究结果。","authors":"Kristen Bova Campbell,&nbsp;Stephanie Dougherty Eickman,&nbsp;Tracy Truong,&nbsp;Eric Black-Maier,&nbsp;Adam S. Barnett,&nbsp;Allen Wang,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Green,&nbsp;James P. Daubert,&nbsp;Robert K. Lewis,&nbsp;Brett D. Atwater,&nbsp;Sana M. Al-Khatib,&nbsp;Tristram D. Bahnson,&nbsp;Kevin L. Thomas,&nbsp;Kevin P. Jackson,&nbsp;Larry R. Jackson,&nbsp;Sean Pokorney,&nbsp;Camille Frazier-Mills,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Piccini","doi":"10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is evidence to suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation; however, the tolerability and safety of colchicine in routine practice is unknown.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF who received colchicine after ablation were matched 1:1 to patients who did not by age, sex, and renal function. Recurrent AF was compared between groups categorically at 12 months and via propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards models with and without a 3-month blanking period.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 180 patients (<i>n</i> = 90 colchicine and <i>n</i> = 90 matched controls) were followed for a median (Q1, Q3) of 10.3 (7.0, 12.0) months. Mean age was 65.3 ± 9.1 years, 33.9% were women, mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.5, and 51.1% had persistent AF. Most patients (70%) received colchicine 0.6 mg daily for a median of 30 days. In the colchicine group, 55 patients (61.1%) were receiving at least one known interacting medication with colchicine. After ablation, one patient required colchicine dose reduction and four patients required discontinuation. After adjusting for covariate imbalance using propensity weighting, no significant association between colchicine use and AF recurrence was identified (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–1.85; <i>p</i> = 0.853). No significant association was found between colchicine use and all-cause hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28–1.96; <i>p</i> = 0.548).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the frequent presence of drug–drug interactions, a 30-day course of colchicine is well-tolerated after AF ablation; however, we did not observe any association between colchicine and lower rates of AF recurrence or hospitalization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"23 6","pages":"709 - 719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colchicine for the Prevention of Recurrent Arrhythmia After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Single-Center, Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Bova Campbell,&nbsp;Stephanie Dougherty Eickman,&nbsp;Tracy Truong,&nbsp;Eric Black-Maier,&nbsp;Adam S. Barnett,&nbsp;Allen Wang,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Green,&nbsp;James P. Daubert,&nbsp;Robert K. Lewis,&nbsp;Brett D. Atwater,&nbsp;Sana M. Al-Khatib,&nbsp;Tristram D. Bahnson,&nbsp;Kevin L. Thomas,&nbsp;Kevin P. Jackson,&nbsp;Larry R. Jackson,&nbsp;Sean Pokorney,&nbsp;Camille Frazier-Mills,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Piccini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is evidence to suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation; however, the tolerability and safety of colchicine in routine practice is unknown.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF who received colchicine after ablation were matched 1:1 to patients who did not by age, sex, and renal function. Recurrent AF was compared between groups categorically at 12 months and via propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards models with and without a 3-month blanking period.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 180 patients (<i>n</i> = 90 colchicine and <i>n</i> = 90 matched controls) were followed for a median (Q1, Q3) of 10.3 (7.0, 12.0) months. Mean age was 65.3 ± 9.1 years, 33.9% were women, mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.5, and 51.1% had persistent AF. Most patients (70%) received colchicine 0.6 mg daily for a median of 30 days. In the colchicine group, 55 patients (61.1%) were receiving at least one known interacting medication with colchicine. After ablation, one patient required colchicine dose reduction and four patients required discontinuation. After adjusting for covariate imbalance using propensity weighting, no significant association between colchicine use and AF recurrence was identified (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–1.85; <i>p</i> = 0.853). No significant association was found between colchicine use and all-cause hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28–1.96; <i>p</i> = 0.548).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the frequent presence of drug–drug interactions, a 30-day course of colchicine is well-tolerated after AF ablation; however, we did not observe any association between colchicine and lower rates of AF recurrence or hospitalization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"709 - 719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-023-00612-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有证据表明秋水仙碱可以降低导管消融后复发性心房颤动(AF)的风险;然而,秋水仙碱在常规应用中的耐受性和安全性尚不清楚。方法:房颤导管消融术后接受秋水仙碱治疗的患者与未按年龄、性别和肾功能进行匹配的患者1:1。在12个月时,通过倾向加权Cox比例风险模型,在有和没有3个月空白期的情况下,对各组之间的复发性房颤进行了明确的比较。结果:总体而言,180名患者(n=90秋水仙碱和n=90匹配对照组)接受了中位(Q1,Q3)10.3(7.0,12.0)个月的随访。平均年龄为65.3±9.1岁,33.9%为女性,平均CHA2DS2-VASc评分为2.9±1.5,51.1%患有持续性房颤。大多数患者(70%)接受秋水仙碱0.6 mg每日治疗,平均持续30天。在秋水仙碱组中,55名患者(61.1%)正在接受至少一种已知的与秋水仙碱相互作用的药物治疗。消融术后,一名患者需要减少秋水仙碱的剂量,四名患者需要停药。在使用倾向加权调整协变量失衡之后,秋水仙碱的使用与房颤复发之间没有显著相关性(调整后的危险比0.94,95%置信区间[CI]0.48-1.85;p=0.853)。秋水仙碱使用与全因住院之间没有显著关联(调整后比值比0.74,95%可信区间0.28-1.96;p=0.548),AF消融后,秋水仙碱的30天疗程耐受性良好;然而,我们没有观察到秋水仙碱与较低的房颤复发率或住院率之间有任何关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Colchicine for the Prevention of Recurrent Arrhythmia After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Single-Center, Retrospective Study

Background

There is evidence to suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation; however, the tolerability and safety of colchicine in routine practice is unknown.

Methods

Patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF who received colchicine after ablation were matched 1:1 to patients who did not by age, sex, and renal function. Recurrent AF was compared between groups categorically at 12 months and via propensity weighted Cox proportional hazards models with and without a 3-month blanking period.

Results

Overall, 180 patients (n = 90 colchicine and n = 90 matched controls) were followed for a median (Q1, Q3) of 10.3 (7.0, 12.0) months. Mean age was 65.3 ± 9.1 years, 33.9% were women, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.5, and 51.1% had persistent AF. Most patients (70%) received colchicine 0.6 mg daily for a median of 30 days. In the colchicine group, 55 patients (61.1%) were receiving at least one known interacting medication with colchicine. After ablation, one patient required colchicine dose reduction and four patients required discontinuation. After adjusting for covariate imbalance using propensity weighting, no significant association between colchicine use and AF recurrence was identified (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48–1.85; p = 0.853). No significant association was found between colchicine use and all-cause hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28–1.96; p = 0.548).

Conclusion

Despite the frequent presence of drug–drug interactions, a 30-day course of colchicine is well-tolerated after AF ablation; however, we did not observe any association between colchicine and lower rates of AF recurrence or hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular Safety of Patisiran Among Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Meta-analysis. Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1