“我们被训练来信任我们的患者”:一项关于全科医生对癌症患者共同护理的信任的定性研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmad095
Faith R Yong, Sundresan Naicker, Kerry Uebel, Maria Agaliotis, Christopher Chan, John D T Nguyen, Thanya Pathirana, Alexandra Hawkey, Kylie Vuong
{"title":"“我们被训练来信任我们的患者”:一项关于全科医生对癌症患者共同护理的信任的定性研究。","authors":"Faith R Yong, Sundresan Naicker, Kerry Uebel, Maria Agaliotis, Christopher Chan, John D T Nguyen, Thanya Pathirana, Alexandra Hawkey, Kylie Vuong","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trust plays a significant role in the patient's access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"1032-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"We're trained to trust our patients\\\": a qualitative study on the general practitioners' trust in patients for colorectal cancer shared care.\",\"authors\":\"Faith R Yong, Sundresan Naicker, Kerry Uebel, Maria Agaliotis, Christopher Chan, John D T Nguyen, Thanya Pathirana, Alexandra Hawkey, Kylie Vuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmad095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trust plays a significant role in the patient's access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1032-1038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗伙伴关系中,医生依靠患者描述他们的健康状况,参与共同决策,并参与支持的自我管理活动。在共享护理中,患者、初级护理和专家服务部门使用商定的流程和输出进行合作,将患者置于其护理中心。然而,很少有实证研究探讨医生对患者的信任及其对共享护理模式的影响。目的:探讨全科医生(GPs)对患者的信任,以及信任对全科医生参与新护理模式(如结直肠癌癌症共享护理)意愿的影响。方法:通过专业网络招募全科医生参与者进行半结构化访谈。对转录本进行完整性检查,归纳编码,并迭代开发主题。结果:分析了25次访谈。一些全科医生将信任视为医生的责任,并有高度信任患者的倾向。对于其他全科医生来说,对患者的信任是基于患者的特点,如诚实、可靠和积极主动的自我护理。全科医生更愿意与结直肠癌癌症患者共同护理,他们与这些患者建立了信任关系。结论:信任在患者获得共同护理方面发挥着重要作用。共享护理的实施应考虑患者和医疗保健提供者之间的关系动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"We're trained to trust our patients": a qualitative study on the general practitioners' trust in patients for colorectal cancer shared care.

Background: In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models.

Aim: To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care.

Methods: GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively.

Results: Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship.

Conclusions: Trust plays a significant role in the patient's access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of general practitioners and practice nurses on nurse-led patient consultations and dose changes of permanent medications-results of a focus group study. 'It's what we should be doing anyway': using financial incentives to promote relational continuity in Australian General Practice-a nested case study analysis. The relationship between self-care preparedness and quality of life in a 3-year-follow-up: a study in primary health care. "I consider myself to be a leader": a qualitative exploration of early career women family physicians' intentions to assume a leadership role. Using an SMS to improve bowel cancer screening: the acceptability and feasibility of a multifaceted intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1