对花生和坚果过敏的患者口服食物挑战的相关性。

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000109
Rita Limão, Borja Bartolomé, Fátima Cabral Duarte
{"title":"对花生和坚果过敏的患者口服食物挑战的相关性。","authors":"Rita Limão,&nbsp;Borja Bartolomé,&nbsp;Fátima Cabral Duarte","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peanut allergy is one of the most common food allergies in childhood. In vitro cross-sensitization between peanut and tree nuts (TN) is high, but only a subgroup of patients allergic to peanut will have a concomitant allergy to one or several TN. In this article, the authors report a case of a 12-year-old boy who experienced 1 episode of lips and mouth itching, generalized urticarial, and eyelid angioedema 20 minutes after ingestion of peanut at 4 years of age. The immunoallergological study revealed the presence of a concomitant allergy to peanut, pistachio, and cashew confirmed with medically supervised oral food challenges (OFC) in a child who had never eaten these TN. The mechanism of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was demonstrated by positive skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial extracts, although the specific IgE (sIgE) for these foods was negative. As described in the literature, we concluded that serum peanut and TN sIgE measurements have lower sensitivity than SPT to assess IgE sensitization, and OFC is the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of food allergy. We highlight the relevance of excluding or confirming TN allergy in a peanut-allergic patient who had never ingested certain TN, and of knowing the clinical relevant cross-reactivity patterns between TN, pistachio/cashew, and walnut/pecan, that could reduce the need for OFC in clinical practice, reducing allergy rates and financial and health burdens of food allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"13 3","pages":"132-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relevance of oral food challenge in a patient allergic to peanut and tree nuts.\",\"authors\":\"Rita Limão,&nbsp;Borja Bartolomé,&nbsp;Fátima Cabral Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peanut allergy is one of the most common food allergies in childhood. In vitro cross-sensitization between peanut and tree nuts (TN) is high, but only a subgroup of patients allergic to peanut will have a concomitant allergy to one or several TN. In this article, the authors report a case of a 12-year-old boy who experienced 1 episode of lips and mouth itching, generalized urticarial, and eyelid angioedema 20 minutes after ingestion of peanut at 4 years of age. The immunoallergological study revealed the presence of a concomitant allergy to peanut, pistachio, and cashew confirmed with medically supervised oral food challenges (OFC) in a child who had never eaten these TN. The mechanism of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was demonstrated by positive skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial extracts, although the specific IgE (sIgE) for these foods was negative. As described in the literature, we concluded that serum peanut and TN sIgE measurements have lower sensitivity than SPT to assess IgE sensitization, and OFC is the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of food allergy. We highlight the relevance of excluding or confirming TN allergy in a peanut-allergic patient who had never ingested certain TN, and of knowing the clinical relevant cross-reactivity patterns between TN, pistachio/cashew, and walnut/pecan, that could reduce the need for OFC in clinical practice, reducing allergy rates and financial and health burdens of food allergy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"132-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

花生过敏是儿童时期最常见的食物过敏之一。花生和树坚果之间的体外交叉致敏(TN)很高,但只有一个对花生过敏的亚组患者会对一种或几种TN同时过敏。在本文中,作者报告了一例12岁男孩在4岁时摄入花生20分钟后出现1次唇口瘙痒、全身性荨麻疹和眼睑血管性水肿。免疫变态反应学研究显示,在一名从未食用过花生、开心果和腰果的儿童中,经医学监督的口服食物挑战(OFC)证实,存在对花生、开心果和腰腰果的伴随过敏。IgE介导的超敏反应机制通过商业提取物的阳性皮肤点刺试验(SPT)证明,尽管这些食物的特异性IgE(sIgE)为阴性。如文献所述,我们得出结论,血清花生和TN sIgE测量在评估IgE致敏性方面的敏感性低于SPT,OFC是准确诊断食物过敏的金标准。我们强调了在从未摄入某些TN的花生过敏患者中排除或确认TN过敏的相关性,以及了解TN、开心果/腰果和核桃/山核桃之间的临床相关交叉反应模式的相关性,这可以减少临床实践中对OFC的需要,降低过敏率以及食物过敏的经济和健康负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relevance of oral food challenge in a patient allergic to peanut and tree nuts.

Peanut allergy is one of the most common food allergies in childhood. In vitro cross-sensitization between peanut and tree nuts (TN) is high, but only a subgroup of patients allergic to peanut will have a concomitant allergy to one or several TN. In this article, the authors report a case of a 12-year-old boy who experienced 1 episode of lips and mouth itching, generalized urticarial, and eyelid angioedema 20 minutes after ingestion of peanut at 4 years of age. The immunoallergological study revealed the presence of a concomitant allergy to peanut, pistachio, and cashew confirmed with medically supervised oral food challenges (OFC) in a child who had never eaten these TN. The mechanism of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity was demonstrated by positive skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial extracts, although the specific IgE (sIgE) for these foods was negative. As described in the literature, we concluded that serum peanut and TN sIgE measurements have lower sensitivity than SPT to assess IgE sensitization, and OFC is the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of food allergy. We highlight the relevance of excluding or confirming TN allergy in a peanut-allergic patient who had never ingested certain TN, and of knowing the clinical relevant cross-reactivity patterns between TN, pistachio/cashew, and walnut/pecan, that could reduce the need for OFC in clinical practice, reducing allergy rates and financial and health burdens of food allergy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody (CM310) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CROWNS-2): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) suspected triggered by lipid transfer protein in a Chinese child: A case report. From tumor to tolerance: A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events. New-onset autoimmune thyroid disease following COVID-19. Identification of cross-reactive IgE-binding proteins from Philippine allergenic grass pollen extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1