在加拿大,教育和饮酒对100%酒精导致的住院或死亡的联合影响。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001674
Brendan T Smith, Christine M Warren, Alessandra T Andreacchi, Naomi Schwartz, Erin Hobin
{"title":"在加拿大,教育和饮酒对100%酒精导致的住院或死亡的联合影响。","authors":"Brendan T Smith, Christine M Warren, Alessandra T Andreacchi, Naomi Schwartz, Erin Hobin","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with low socioeconomic position (SEP) experience disproportionately greater alcohol-attributable harm than individuals with high SEP despite similar or less alcohol use (i.e., the alcohol harm paradox). We examined the sex/gender- specific independent and joint effects of education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use on 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study among 199,125 current and former alcohol users aged 15-64 years from population-representative Canadian Community Health Surveys (2000-2008) linked to hospitalization and mortality records through 2017. We estimated the sex/gender-specific associations between education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use and incident 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death using multivariable Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models with competing risk (non-100% alcohol-attributable deaths), assessing additive interactions using the Synergy Index (S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, heavy drinking prevalence and volume of alcohol use were similar or lower in individuals with lower education compared with higher education. Lower education levels compared with a bachelor's degree or above were associated with increased 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death [e.g., less than high school, men: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78; 95% CI = 2.17, 3.56; women: HR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.00, 4.44]. We found superadditive joint effects between low education and heavy drinking (men: S = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.14, 1.30; women: S = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.88, 2.04) and low education and higher volume of alcohol use (e.g., excess volume, men: S = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.62; women: S = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.77, 2.58), with larger inequities in women than men with similar alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study is consistent with the hypothesis that increased vulnerability to alcohol use among individuals with lower education partially explains the alcohol harm paradox in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Joint Effect of Education and Alcohol Use on 100% Alcohol-attributable Hospitalization or Death in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan T Smith, Christine M Warren, Alessandra T Andreacchi, Naomi Schwartz, Erin Hobin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with low socioeconomic position (SEP) experience disproportionately greater alcohol-attributable harm than individuals with high SEP despite similar or less alcohol use (i.e., the alcohol harm paradox). We examined the sex/gender- specific independent and joint effects of education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use on 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study among 199,125 current and former alcohol users aged 15-64 years from population-representative Canadian Community Health Surveys (2000-2008) linked to hospitalization and mortality records through 2017. We estimated the sex/gender-specific associations between education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use and incident 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death using multivariable Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models with competing risk (non-100% alcohol-attributable deaths), assessing additive interactions using the Synergy Index (S).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, heavy drinking prevalence and volume of alcohol use were similar or lower in individuals with lower education compared with higher education. Lower education levels compared with a bachelor's degree or above were associated with increased 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death [e.g., less than high school, men: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78; 95% CI = 2.17, 3.56; women: HR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.00, 4.44]. We found superadditive joint effects between low education and heavy drinking (men: S = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.14, 1.30; women: S = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.88, 2.04) and low education and higher volume of alcohol use (e.g., excess volume, men: S = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.62; women: S = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.77, 2.58), with larger inequities in women than men with similar alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study is consistent with the hypothesis that increased vulnerability to alcohol use among individuals with lower education partially explains the alcohol harm paradox in Canada.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001674\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管饮酒相似或较少,但社会经济地位低(SEP)的个体比SEP高的个体经历了不成比例的更大的酒精危害(即酒精危害悖论)。我们研究了教育、酗酒或大量饮酒对100%酒精导致的住院或死亡的性别/性别独立和联合影响。方法:我们对199125名15-64岁的现任和前任饮酒者进行了一项队列研究,这些人来自具有人口代表性的加拿大社区健康调查(2000-08),与2017年的住院和死亡率记录有关。我们使用具有竞争风险(非100%酒精可归因死亡)的多变量Fine和Gray亚分布危险模型,使用协同指数(S)评估加性相互作用,估计了教育与酗酒或饮酒量与100%酒精可归咎住院或死亡事件之间的性别/性别特异性关联。结果:总体而言,与高学历相比,低学历人群的酗酒患病率和饮酒量相似或更低。与学士学位或以上学历相比,教育水平较低与100%酒精导致的住院或死亡增加有关(例如,低于高中,男性:HR=2.78,95%CI:2.17-3.56;女性:HR=2.98,95%CI=2.00-4.44)以及更高的饮酒量(例如,过量饮酒的男性:S=1.30,95%CI:1.05-1.62;女性:S=1.41,95%CI:0.77-2.58),女性比类似饮酒的男性存在更大的不平等。结论:我们的研究与以下假设一致,即受教育程度较低的人更容易饮酒,这在一定程度上解释了加拿大的酒精危害悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Joint Effect of Education and Alcohol Use on 100% Alcohol-attributable Hospitalization or Death in Canada.

Background: Individuals with low socioeconomic position (SEP) experience disproportionately greater alcohol-attributable harm than individuals with high SEP despite similar or less alcohol use (i.e., the alcohol harm paradox). We examined the sex/gender- specific independent and joint effects of education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use on 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study among 199,125 current and former alcohol users aged 15-64 years from population-representative Canadian Community Health Surveys (2000-2008) linked to hospitalization and mortality records through 2017. We estimated the sex/gender-specific associations between education and heavy drinking or volume of alcohol use and incident 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death using multivariable Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models with competing risk (non-100% alcohol-attributable deaths), assessing additive interactions using the Synergy Index (S).

Results: Overall, heavy drinking prevalence and volume of alcohol use were similar or lower in individuals with lower education compared with higher education. Lower education levels compared with a bachelor's degree or above were associated with increased 100% alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death [e.g., less than high school, men: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78; 95% CI = 2.17, 3.56; women: HR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.00, 4.44]. We found superadditive joint effects between low education and heavy drinking (men: S = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.14, 1.30; women: S = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.88, 2.04) and low education and higher volume of alcohol use (e.g., excess volume, men: S = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.62; women: S = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.77, 2.58), with larger inequities in women than men with similar alcohol use.

Conclusions: Our study is consistent with the hypothesis that increased vulnerability to alcohol use among individuals with lower education partially explains the alcohol harm paradox in Canada.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Maternal health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.: an interrupted time series analysis. Interpreting Violations of Falsification Tests in the Context of Multiple Proposed Instrumental Variables. Outcome of Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Preterm Birth. Synthesizing Subject-matter Expertise for Variable Selection in Causal Effect Estimation: A Case Study. Ambient Air Pollution Exposures and Child Executive Function: A US Multicohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1