共同设计和制定实施策略:在澳大利亚学校加强PAX良好行为游戏。

Journal of prevention (2022) Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s10935-023-00749-9
Rachel Baffsky, Rebecca Ivers, Patricia Cullen, Lauren McGillivray, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Alison L Calear, Philip J Batterham, John W Toumbourou, Rhoni Stokes, Pauline Kotselas, Traci Prendergast, Michelle Torok
{"title":"共同设计和制定实施策略:在澳大利亚学校加强PAX良好行为游戏。","authors":"Rachel Baffsky, Rebecca Ivers, Patricia Cullen, Lauren McGillivray, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Alison L Calear, Philip J Batterham, John W Toumbourou, Rhoni Stokes, Pauline Kotselas, Traci Prendergast, Michelle Torok","doi":"10.1007/s10935-023-00749-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective implementation strategies are important for take-up of programs in schools. However, to date, few implementation strategies have been co-designed with teachers and support staff (including principals) in Australia. The aim of this study was to iteratively co-design multiple implementation strategies to enhance the delivery of mental health prevention program, PAX Good Behaviour Game, in New South Wales primary schools. The secondary aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the implementation strategies from the perspective of school staff. Twenty-nine educational staff (including principals) informed the co-design of the implementation strategies across three phases. Phase 1 involved a rapid review of the literature and stakeholder meetings to agree upon potential evidence-based strategies. Phase 2 involved focus group discussions with educational staff to co-design implementation strategies. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews with school staff to assess strategy acceptability after implementation at 6-months post-baseline. Data were analysed using deductive, framework analysis. The final co-designed intervention included nine implementation strategies accessible through a toolkit delivered to the school's leadership team. These strategies were deemed acceptable in school settings that experienced periods of both face-to-face and remote learning due to the changing COVID-19 situation in 2021. This paper contributes to the implementation literature by transparently reporting how educational staff-informed implementation strategies were iteratively co-designed. This will provide a roadmap for other researchers to co-design implementation strategies to further support the delivery of evidence-based prevention programs in schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":" ","pages":"679-704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-design and Development of Implementation Strategies: Enhancing the PAX Good Behaviour Game in Australian Schools.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Baffsky, Rebecca Ivers, Patricia Cullen, Lauren McGillivray, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Alison L Calear, Philip J Batterham, John W Toumbourou, Rhoni Stokes, Pauline Kotselas, Traci Prendergast, Michelle Torok\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10935-023-00749-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective implementation strategies are important for take-up of programs in schools. However, to date, few implementation strategies have been co-designed with teachers and support staff (including principals) in Australia. The aim of this study was to iteratively co-design multiple implementation strategies to enhance the delivery of mental health prevention program, PAX Good Behaviour Game, in New South Wales primary schools. The secondary aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the implementation strategies from the perspective of school staff. Twenty-nine educational staff (including principals) informed the co-design of the implementation strategies across three phases. Phase 1 involved a rapid review of the literature and stakeholder meetings to agree upon potential evidence-based strategies. Phase 2 involved focus group discussions with educational staff to co-design implementation strategies. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews with school staff to assess strategy acceptability after implementation at 6-months post-baseline. Data were analysed using deductive, framework analysis. The final co-designed intervention included nine implementation strategies accessible through a toolkit delivered to the school's leadership team. These strategies were deemed acceptable in school settings that experienced periods of both face-to-face and remote learning due to the changing COVID-19 situation in 2021. This paper contributes to the implementation literature by transparently reporting how educational staff-informed implementation strategies were iteratively co-designed. This will provide a roadmap for other researchers to co-design implementation strategies to further support the delivery of evidence-based prevention programs in schools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prevention (2022)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"679-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prevention (2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00749-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00749-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的实施策略对于学校项目的实施非常重要。然而,迄今为止,与澳大利亚的教师和辅助人员(包括校长)共同制定的实施战略很少。本研究的目的是反复共同设计多种实施策略,以加强新南威尔士州小学心理健康预防计划PAX良好行为游戏的实施。次要目的是从学校工作人员的角度评估实施策略的可接受性。29名教育工作人员(包括校长)为三个阶段实施战略的共同设计提供了信息。第一阶段涉及对文献的快速审查和利益相关者会议,以商定潜在的循证战略。第二阶段包括与教育工作人员进行焦点小组讨论,共同设计实施战略。第三阶段包括对学校工作人员进行半结构化访谈,以评估在基线后6个月实施策略后的可接受性。数据采用演绎、框架分析法进行分析。最终共同设计的干预措施包括九项实施战略,可通过提供给学校领导团队的工具包获得。由于2021年新冠肺炎疫情的变化,这些策略在经历了面对面和远程学习的学校环境中被认为是可以接受的。本文通过透明地报告教育人员知情的实施策略是如何反复共同设计的,为实施文献做出了贡献。这将为其他研究人员共同设计实施策略提供路线图,以进一步支持在学校实施循证预防计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-design and Development of Implementation Strategies: Enhancing the PAX Good Behaviour Game in Australian Schools.

Effective implementation strategies are important for take-up of programs in schools. However, to date, few implementation strategies have been co-designed with teachers and support staff (including principals) in Australia. The aim of this study was to iteratively co-design multiple implementation strategies to enhance the delivery of mental health prevention program, PAX Good Behaviour Game, in New South Wales primary schools. The secondary aim was to evaluate the acceptability of the implementation strategies from the perspective of school staff. Twenty-nine educational staff (including principals) informed the co-design of the implementation strategies across three phases. Phase 1 involved a rapid review of the literature and stakeholder meetings to agree upon potential evidence-based strategies. Phase 2 involved focus group discussions with educational staff to co-design implementation strategies. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews with school staff to assess strategy acceptability after implementation at 6-months post-baseline. Data were analysed using deductive, framework analysis. The final co-designed intervention included nine implementation strategies accessible through a toolkit delivered to the school's leadership team. These strategies were deemed acceptable in school settings that experienced periods of both face-to-face and remote learning due to the changing COVID-19 situation in 2021. This paper contributes to the implementation literature by transparently reporting how educational staff-informed implementation strategies were iteratively co-designed. This will provide a roadmap for other researchers to co-design implementation strategies to further support the delivery of evidence-based prevention programs in schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Schizophrenia Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pilot Implementation of Guiando Buenas Decisiones, an Evidence-Based Parenting Program for Spanish-Speaking Families, in Pediatric Primary Care in a Large, U.S. Health System: A Qualitative Interview Study. The Role of Health Literacy in Skin Cancer Preventative Behavior and Implications for Intervention: A Systematic Review. Start-Up and Implementation Costs for the Trust Based Relational Intervention. Using Digital Storytelling and Social Media to Combat COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Public Service Social Marketing Campaign.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1