抗米勒激素:诊断多囊卵巢综合征的有用工具。

Khansa Chaabouni, Rihab Makhlouf, Fatma Khanfir, Chema Mezghani, Aida Elleuch, Houda Ben Ayed, Mohamed Abid, Kamel Jamoussi, Kais Chaabene, Madiha Frikha Mseddi, Fatma Makni Ayadi
{"title":"抗米勒激素:诊断多囊卵巢综合征的有用工具。","authors":"Khansa Chaabouni,&nbsp;Rihab Makhlouf,&nbsp;Fatma Khanfir,&nbsp;Chema Mezghani,&nbsp;Aida Elleuch,&nbsp;Houda Ben Ayed,&nbsp;Mohamed Abid,&nbsp;Kamel Jamoussi,&nbsp;Kais Chaabene,&nbsp;Madiha Frikha Mseddi,&nbsp;Fatma Makni Ayadi","doi":"10.1684/abc.2023.1830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is the most frequent endocrine disorder that affects reproductive-age women with important long-term health implications. As such, the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was proposed as a helpful test to identify women with PCOS. The aim of this study was to determine an AMH cut-off value for the diagnosis of PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a two-year cross-sectional study including women of reproductive age, diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria (2003). The control group of healthy women was age-matched. AMH was performed using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. AMH levels were compared and evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 women were enrolled in this study. Of these, 65 were diagnosed with PCOS, and 65 were healthy. No significant difference was detected in body mass index between the two groups. AMH levels were significantly higher in women with PCOS (p = < 0.001). No significant difference in AMH levels was detected between PCOS phenotypes. A cut-off of 25.1 pmol/L (3.5 ng/mL) could discriminate women with PCOS from controls with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 72.3%. The area under the curve was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that AMH had good diagnostic potential as a complement to Rotterdam criteria for PCOS diagnosis in reproductive-age women of Tunisian origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":93870,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":" ","pages":"410-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anti-Müllerian hormone: A useful tool for diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Khansa Chaabouni,&nbsp;Rihab Makhlouf,&nbsp;Fatma Khanfir,&nbsp;Chema Mezghani,&nbsp;Aida Elleuch,&nbsp;Houda Ben Ayed,&nbsp;Mohamed Abid,&nbsp;Kamel Jamoussi,&nbsp;Kais Chaabene,&nbsp;Madiha Frikha Mseddi,&nbsp;Fatma Makni Ayadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/abc.2023.1830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is the most frequent endocrine disorder that affects reproductive-age women with important long-term health implications. As such, the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was proposed as a helpful test to identify women with PCOS. The aim of this study was to determine an AMH cut-off value for the diagnosis of PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a two-year cross-sectional study including women of reproductive age, diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria (2003). The control group of healthy women was age-matched. AMH was performed using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. AMH levels were compared and evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 women were enrolled in this study. Of these, 65 were diagnosed with PCOS, and 65 were healthy. No significant difference was detected in body mass index between the two groups. AMH levels were significantly higher in women with PCOS (p = < 0.001). No significant difference in AMH levels was detected between PCOS phenotypes. A cut-off of 25.1 pmol/L (3.5 ng/mL) could discriminate women with PCOS from controls with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 72.3%. The area under the curve was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that AMH had good diagnostic potential as a complement to Rotterdam criteria for PCOS diagnosis in reproductive-age women of Tunisian origin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"410-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2023.1830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2023.1830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是影响育龄妇女的最常见的内分泌紊乱,对健康具有重要的长期影响。因此,抗米勒激素(AMH)被认为是一种有助于识别多囊卵巢综合征女性的测试方法。本研究的目的是确定诊断PCOS的AMH临界值。方法:这是一项为期两年的横断面研究,包括根据鹿特丹标准(2003)诊断为PCOS的育龄妇女。对照组的健康女性年龄相匹配。AMH采用电化学发光免疫测定法进行。将AMH水平与受试者工作特性曲线分析进行比较和评估。结果:共有130名女性参与了这项研究。其中65人被诊断为多囊卵巢综合征,65人健康。两组之间的体重指数没有显著差异。患有多囊卵巢综合征的妇女的AMH水平显著较高(p=结论:我们的研究表明,AMH作为鹿特丹标准的补充,在突尼斯裔育龄妇女中具有良好的诊断潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The anti-Müllerian hormone: A useful tool for diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Background: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is the most frequent endocrine disorder that affects reproductive-age women with important long-term health implications. As such, the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was proposed as a helpful test to identify women with PCOS. The aim of this study was to determine an AMH cut-off value for the diagnosis of PCOS.

Methods: This was a two-year cross-sectional study including women of reproductive age, diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria (2003). The control group of healthy women was age-matched. AMH was performed using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. AMH levels were compared and evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: A total of 130 women were enrolled in this study. Of these, 65 were diagnosed with PCOS, and 65 were healthy. No significant difference was detected in body mass index between the two groups. AMH levels were significantly higher in women with PCOS (p = < 0.001). No significant difference in AMH levels was detected between PCOS phenotypes. A cut-off of 25.1 pmol/L (3.5 ng/mL) could discriminate women with PCOS from controls with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 72.3%. The area under the curve was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that AMH had good diagnostic potential as a complement to Rotterdam criteria for PCOS diagnosis in reproductive-age women of Tunisian origin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complementarity between Bayesian Internal Quality Control results management and External Quality Assessment bivariate z-score analysis: application to a concrete case study. [Can TDABC (Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing) help the NOVO hospital's medical biology laboratory to value the appropriate prescription? - Role of the biologist in reducing healthcare costs]. [Clinical associations of anti-Jo1 antibodies in a Moroccan population]. [Clinical-biological approaches to the spectrophotometric detection of oxyhemoglobin and bilirubin in CSF in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage]. [Evaluation of the CellaVision® DM-1200 system for detecting and quantifying schistocytes].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1