单血管流出对自由组织移植用于下肢重建的长期结果的影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2181-7149
Samuel S Huffman, John D Bovill, Karen Li, Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Jenna C Bekeny, Cameron M Akbari, Kenneth L Fan, Karen K Evans
{"title":"单血管流出对自由组织移植用于下肢重建的长期结果的影响。","authors":"Samuel S Huffman, John D Bovill, Karen Li, Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Jenna C Bekeny, Cameron M Akbari, Kenneth L Fan, Karen K Evans","doi":"10.1055/a-2181-7149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patients with complex lower extremity (LE) wounds and single-vessel LE runoff (1-VRO) are often considered for amputation. While more challenging, free tissue transfer (FTT) is a means for limb salvage. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of limb salvage with FTT in patients with 1-VRO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients undergoing FTT by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, wound characteristics, vascular status, and operative details. Patients were divided into cohorts based on 1- versus 3-VRO of tibial vessel inflow. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications such as flap necrosis, flap success, limb salvage, and ambulatory status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 188 patients underwent FTT to LE, with 25 patients (13.3%) having 1-VRO. Patients with 1-VRO had a comparable prevalence of diabetes (56.0% vs. 50.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.569) and end-stage renal disease (8.0% vs. 3.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.319). Osteomyelitis was more common in the 1-VRO group (80.0% vs. 60.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.056). FTT donor sites and flap composition were similar between cohorts. At mean follow-up of 21.2 months (interquartile range 24.5:5.6, 30.1 months), limb salvage rates were similar between cohorts (84.0% vs. 91.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.241), with no significant differences in ambulatory status or mortality. Higher complication rates occurred in the 1-VRO cohort (48.0% vs. 21.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), of which partial flap necrosis was more prevalent in the 1-VRO group (8.0% vs. 1.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.029). There was no difference in flap success rates between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.805). More postflap angiograms were performed in the 1-VRO group (32.0% vs. 9.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), but there was no difference in need for repeat percutaneous endovascular intervention between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates that FTT reconstruction to the LE remains a reliable reconstruction option for limb salvage in patients with single-vessel supply to the LE. Reliance on advanced perioperative management and patient optimization is effective at reducing negative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of Single-Vessel Runoff on Long-Term Outcomes of Free Tissue Transfer for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel S Huffman, John D Bovill, Karen Li, Daisy L Spoer, Lauren E Berger, Jenna C Bekeny, Cameron M Akbari, Kenneth L Fan, Karen K Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2181-7149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patients with complex lower extremity (LE) wounds and single-vessel LE runoff (1-VRO) are often considered for amputation. While more challenging, free tissue transfer (FTT) is a means for limb salvage. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of limb salvage with FTT in patients with 1-VRO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients undergoing FTT by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, wound characteristics, vascular status, and operative details. Patients were divided into cohorts based on 1- versus 3-VRO of tibial vessel inflow. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications such as flap necrosis, flap success, limb salvage, and ambulatory status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 188 patients underwent FTT to LE, with 25 patients (13.3%) having 1-VRO. Patients with 1-VRO had a comparable prevalence of diabetes (56.0% vs. 50.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.569) and end-stage renal disease (8.0% vs. 3.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.319). Osteomyelitis was more common in the 1-VRO group (80.0% vs. 60.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.056). FTT donor sites and flap composition were similar between cohorts. At mean follow-up of 21.2 months (interquartile range 24.5:5.6, 30.1 months), limb salvage rates were similar between cohorts (84.0% vs. 91.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.241), with no significant differences in ambulatory status or mortality. Higher complication rates occurred in the 1-VRO cohort (48.0% vs. 21.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), of which partial flap necrosis was more prevalent in the 1-VRO group (8.0% vs. 1.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.029). There was no difference in flap success rates between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.805). More postflap angiograms were performed in the 1-VRO group (32.0% vs. 9.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), but there was no difference in need for repeat percutaneous endovascular intervention between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates that FTT reconstruction to the LE remains a reliable reconstruction option for limb salvage in patients with single-vessel supply to the LE. Reliance on advanced perioperative management and patient optimization is effective at reducing negative outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7149\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2181-7149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有复杂下肢(LE)伤口和单血管LE流出(1-VRO)的患者通常被考虑截肢。虽然更具挑战性,但自由组织移植(FTT)是一种挽救肢体的手段。本研究旨在证明在1-VRO患者中进行FTT保肢的可行性。方法:回顾性回顾2011年至2021年间由一名外科医生进行FTT的患者。收集的数据包括人口统计、伤口特征、血管状况和手术细节。根据胫骨血管流入量的1-与3-VRO将患者分为队列。感兴趣的结果包括术后并发症,如皮瓣坏死、皮瓣成功、肢体挽救和活动状态。结果:共有188名患者接受了FTT至LE,其中25名患者(13.3%)患有1-VRO。1-VRO患者的糖尿病患病率(56.0%对50.0%,p=0.569)和终末期肾病患病率(8.0%对3.7%,p=0.319)相当。骨髓炎在1-VRO组中更常见(80.0%对60.1%,p=0.056)。FTT供区和皮瓣组成在队列之间相似。平均随访21.2个月(IQR 24.5:5.630.1个月)时,各队列的肢体挽救率相似(84.0%对91.4%,p=0.241),在动态状态或死亡率方面没有显著差异。1-VRO队列的并发症发生率更高(48.0%对21.5%,p=0.004),其中1-VRO组的部分皮瓣坏死更为普遍(8.0%对1.2%,p=0.029)。两组之间的皮瓣成功率没有差异(p=0.805)。1-VRO小组进行了更多的瓣后血管造影(32.0%对9.2%,p=0.001),但两组之间重复经皮血管内介入治疗的必要性没有差异。结论:本研究表明,对于单一血管供应的LE患者,FTT重建LE仍然是一种可靠的肢体挽救重建选择。依靠先进的围手术期管理和患者优化可以有效减少负面结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications of Single-Vessel Runoff on Long-Term Outcomes of Free Tissue Transfer for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Background:  Patients with complex lower extremity (LE) wounds and single-vessel LE runoff (1-VRO) are often considered for amputation. While more challenging, free tissue transfer (FTT) is a means for limb salvage. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of limb salvage with FTT in patients with 1-VRO.

Methods:  Patients undergoing FTT by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, wound characteristics, vascular status, and operative details. Patients were divided into cohorts based on 1- versus 3-VRO of tibial vessel inflow. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications such as flap necrosis, flap success, limb salvage, and ambulatory status.

Results:  A total of 188 patients underwent FTT to LE, with 25 patients (13.3%) having 1-VRO. Patients with 1-VRO had a comparable prevalence of diabetes (56.0% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.569) and end-stage renal disease (8.0% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.319). Osteomyelitis was more common in the 1-VRO group (80.0% vs. 60.1%, p = 0.056). FTT donor sites and flap composition were similar between cohorts. At mean follow-up of 21.2 months (interquartile range 24.5:5.6, 30.1 months), limb salvage rates were similar between cohorts (84.0% vs. 91.4%, p = 0.241), with no significant differences in ambulatory status or mortality. Higher complication rates occurred in the 1-VRO cohort (48.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.004), of which partial flap necrosis was more prevalent in the 1-VRO group (8.0% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.029). There was no difference in flap success rates between groups (p = 0.805). More postflap angiograms were performed in the 1-VRO group (32.0% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.001), but there was no difference in need for repeat percutaneous endovascular intervention between groups.

Conclusion:  This study demonstrates that FTT reconstruction to the LE remains a reliable reconstruction option for limb salvage in patients with single-vessel supply to the LE. Reliance on advanced perioperative management and patient optimization is effective at reducing negative outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature. Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Modern High-Volume Microsurgery Center. Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020. Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery-vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Anatomical Study. DIEP Donor Site Satisfaction between Patients with and without History of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1