堪萨斯大学坐位平衡量表的评分者间和评分者内信度。

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1080/07380577.2022.2082000
Ingrid A Franc, Samantha Mauldin, Magdalena Roberts, Gregoria Rosa-DiStefano
{"title":"堪萨斯大学坐位平衡量表的评分者间和评分者内信度。","authors":"Ingrid A Franc,&nbsp;Samantha Mauldin,&nbsp;Magdalena Roberts,&nbsp;Gregoria Rosa-DiStefano","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2022.2082000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kluding et al., created <i>The Kansas University Sitting and Standing Balance Scales</i> (KUSSBS) in 2006 to meet the need for objective documentation of balance and for a tool without a floor effect. Rater reliabilities were established by Kluding for the standing scale, but not for the sitting balance scale (KUSitBS). The aim of this study was to establish inter- and intra-rater reliability for the KUSitBS. Four occupational therapists were recruited to rate a videotaped performance of a simulated patient. Resulting inter-rater reliability inter-class coefficients (ICC) are good, <i>ICC</i> = .877, <i>p</i> < .01, suggesting that sitting balance on the KUSitBS was rated similarly across coders. Intra-rater reliability ICC are excellent, <i>ICC</i> = .914, indicating that each occupational therapist rated sitting balance on the KUSitBS similarly at initial assessment and then again two weeks later. In order to have confidence in using any assessment tool, intra- and inter-rater reliability must be established. This study's results advance the use of the KUSitBS with adult populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Kansas University Sitting Balance Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid A Franc,&nbsp;Samantha Mauldin,&nbsp;Magdalena Roberts,&nbsp;Gregoria Rosa-DiStefano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2022.2082000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kluding et al., created <i>The Kansas University Sitting and Standing Balance Scales</i> (KUSSBS) in 2006 to meet the need for objective documentation of balance and for a tool without a floor effect. Rater reliabilities were established by Kluding for the standing scale, but not for the sitting balance scale (KUSitBS). The aim of this study was to establish inter- and intra-rater reliability for the KUSitBS. Four occupational therapists were recruited to rate a videotaped performance of a simulated patient. Resulting inter-rater reliability inter-class coefficients (ICC) are good, <i>ICC</i> = .877, <i>p</i> < .01, suggesting that sitting balance on the KUSitBS was rated similarly across coders. Intra-rater reliability ICC are excellent, <i>ICC</i> = .914, indicating that each occupational therapist rated sitting balance on the KUSitBS similarly at initial assessment and then again two weeks later. In order to have confidence in using any assessment tool, intra- and inter-rater reliability must be established. This study's results advance the use of the KUSitBS with adult populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2082000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2082000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Kluding等人。,2006年创建了堪萨斯大学坐立平衡秤(KUSSBS),以满足客观记录平衡和无地板效应工具的需求。Kluding为站立量表建立了评分可靠性,但不为坐姿平衡量表(KUSitBS)建立。本研究的目的是建立KUSitBS的评分者间和评分者内的可靠性。四名职业治疗师被招募来对一名模拟患者的录像表现进行评分。由此产生的评分者间可靠性类间系数(ICC)良好,ICC=.877,p<.01,这表明KUSitBS上的坐平衡在不同编码者之间的评分相似。评分者内部的可靠性ICC非常好,ICC=.914,这表明每个职业治疗师在最初评估时和两周后再次在KUSitBS上对坐姿平衡进行了类似的评分。为了有信心使用任何评估工具,必须建立评分者内部和内部的可靠性。这项研究的结果促进了KUSitBS在成年人群中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Kansas University Sitting Balance Scale.

Kluding et al., created The Kansas University Sitting and Standing Balance Scales (KUSSBS) in 2006 to meet the need for objective documentation of balance and for a tool without a floor effect. Rater reliabilities were established by Kluding for the standing scale, but not for the sitting balance scale (KUSitBS). The aim of this study was to establish inter- and intra-rater reliability for the KUSitBS. Four occupational therapists were recruited to rate a videotaped performance of a simulated patient. Resulting inter-rater reliability inter-class coefficients (ICC) are good, ICC = .877, p < .01, suggesting that sitting balance on the KUSitBS was rated similarly across coders. Intra-rater reliability ICC are excellent, ICC = .914, indicating that each occupational therapist rated sitting balance on the KUSitBS similarly at initial assessment and then again two weeks later. In order to have confidence in using any assessment tool, intra- and inter-rater reliability must be established. This study's results advance the use of the KUSitBS with adult populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
期刊最新文献
How the Occupational Competence and Quality of Life in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Changed During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Design Study. Mental Health Interventions to Improve Body Image Outcomes for Ostomates: A Systematic Review. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Occupational Therapists in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. Development of Web-Based Learning Media on Behavior Management to Enhance Activities of Daily Living for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. The Psychosocial Impacts of Co-Designed Healing Gardens Among Aged Care Residents With and Without Dementia in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1