一项比较人际心理治疗与长期暴露治疗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102770
M. Tracie Shea , Janice L. Krupnick , Frederic J. Sautter , Mihriye Mete , Bonnie L. Green , Sonya B. Norman , Shauna L. Finley , Erica Eaton
{"title":"一项比较人际心理治疗与长期暴露治疗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验。","authors":"M. Tracie Shea ,&nbsp;Janice L. Krupnick ,&nbsp;Frederic J. Sautter ,&nbsp;Mihriye Mete ,&nbsp;Bonnie L. Green ,&nbsp;Sonya B. Norman ,&nbsp;Shauna L. Finley ,&nbsp;Erica Eaton","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Trauma-focused therapies are recommended as first-line treatments for </span>posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but many veterans do not complete or sufficiently respond to these treatments. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) is a non-trauma focused approach that directly addresses the interpersonal and social impairments associated with PTSD. This two-site randomized controlled equivalence trial compared IPT with Prolonged Exposure (PE) in improving PTSD symptoms and interpersonal functioning in 109 veterans with PTSD. Secondary outcomes included functioning and </span>quality of life. We hypothesized that IPT would be statistically equivalent to PE in reducing PTSD symptoms, and superior to PE in improving interpersonal functioning and secondary outcomes of work and social adjustment and quality of life. PTSD symptom severity decreased significantly in both treatments from pre- to post-treatment. Although IPT improved as much as PE and treatments did not differ significantly, the 95 % confidence interval for the difference between the groups did not fall completely within the margin of equivalence. IPT was not superior to PE in improvement in interpersonal functioning or on secondary outcomes. Findings from multi-level linear mixed models using longitudinal data (posttreatment, three and six month follow up) for the primary outcomes of PTSD and interpersonal functioning were consistent with the post-treatment analyses. Although statistically inconclusive in terms of equivalence, the comparable reduction in PTSD symptoms slightly favoring IPT suggests that IPT is an acceptable alternative to gold-standard trauma-focused treatments for veterans with PTSD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized clinical trial comparing Interpersonal Psychotherapy with Prolonged Exposure for the treatment of PTSD in veterans\",\"authors\":\"M. Tracie Shea ,&nbsp;Janice L. Krupnick ,&nbsp;Frederic J. Sautter ,&nbsp;Mihriye Mete ,&nbsp;Bonnie L. Green ,&nbsp;Sonya B. Norman ,&nbsp;Shauna L. Finley ,&nbsp;Erica Eaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Trauma-focused therapies are recommended as first-line treatments for </span>posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but many veterans do not complete or sufficiently respond to these treatments. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) is a non-trauma focused approach that directly addresses the interpersonal and social impairments associated with PTSD. This two-site randomized controlled equivalence trial compared IPT with Prolonged Exposure (PE) in improving PTSD symptoms and interpersonal functioning in 109 veterans with PTSD. Secondary outcomes included functioning and </span>quality of life. We hypothesized that IPT would be statistically equivalent to PE in reducing PTSD symptoms, and superior to PE in improving interpersonal functioning and secondary outcomes of work and social adjustment and quality of life. PTSD symptom severity decreased significantly in both treatments from pre- to post-treatment. Although IPT improved as much as PE and treatments did not differ significantly, the 95 % confidence interval for the difference between the groups did not fall completely within the margin of equivalence. IPT was not superior to PE in improvement in interpersonal functioning or on secondary outcomes. Findings from multi-level linear mixed models using longitudinal data (posttreatment, three and six month follow up) for the primary outcomes of PTSD and interpersonal functioning were consistent with the post-treatment analyses. Although statistically inconclusive in terms of equivalence, the comparable reduction in PTSD symptoms slightly favoring IPT suggests that IPT is an acceptable alternative to gold-standard trauma-focused treatments for veterans with PTSD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618523001081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618523001081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以创伤为重点的治疗被推荐为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的一线治疗方法,但许多退伍军人对这些治疗没有完全或充分的反应。人际治疗(IPT)是一种非创伤为主的方法,直接解决与创伤后应激障碍相关的人际和社会障碍。这项双点随机对照等效试验比较了IPT和长期暴露(PE)在改善109名创伤后应激障碍退伍军人的创伤后应激症状和人际功能方面的作用。次要结果包括功能和生活质量。我们假设IPT在减少创伤后应激障碍症状方面在统计学上与PE相当,在改善人际功能、工作的次要结果、社会适应和生活质量方面优于PE。从治疗前到治疗后,PTSD症状的严重程度在两种治疗中都显著降低。尽管IPT的改善程度与PE相当,并且治疗没有显著差异,但两组之间差异的95%置信区间并没有完全落在等效范围内。IPT在人际功能或次要结果方面的改善并不优于PE。使用纵向数据(治疗后、三个月和六个月随访)建立的多层次线性混合模型对创伤后应激障碍的主要结果和人际功能的研究结果与治疗后分析一致。尽管在等效性方面没有统计学上的结论,但创伤后应激障碍症状的可比性减少略微有利于IPT,这表明IPT是一种可以接受的替代金标准创伤后应激疾病退伍军人治疗的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized clinical trial comparing Interpersonal Psychotherapy with Prolonged Exposure for the treatment of PTSD in veterans

Trauma-focused therapies are recommended as first-line treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but many veterans do not complete or sufficiently respond to these treatments. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) is a non-trauma focused approach that directly addresses the interpersonal and social impairments associated with PTSD. This two-site randomized controlled equivalence trial compared IPT with Prolonged Exposure (PE) in improving PTSD symptoms and interpersonal functioning in 109 veterans with PTSD. Secondary outcomes included functioning and quality of life. We hypothesized that IPT would be statistically equivalent to PE in reducing PTSD symptoms, and superior to PE in improving interpersonal functioning and secondary outcomes of work and social adjustment and quality of life. PTSD symptom severity decreased significantly in both treatments from pre- to post-treatment. Although IPT improved as much as PE and treatments did not differ significantly, the 95 % confidence interval for the difference between the groups did not fall completely within the margin of equivalence. IPT was not superior to PE in improvement in interpersonal functioning or on secondary outcomes. Findings from multi-level linear mixed models using longitudinal data (posttreatment, three and six month follow up) for the primary outcomes of PTSD and interpersonal functioning were consistent with the post-treatment analyses. Although statistically inconclusive in terms of equivalence, the comparable reduction in PTSD symptoms slightly favoring IPT suggests that IPT is an acceptable alternative to gold-standard trauma-focused treatments for veterans with PTSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Daily stress and emotions in relation to fear of negative and positive evaluation Fear of positive evaluation and social affiliation in social anxiety disorder and major depression A within-person test of the metacognitive model: Daily dynamics between metacognitive beliefs, metacognitive strategies, and negative affect Cross-cultural validation of the BFOE model: Best practices and future directions for psychometric evaluation of the Fear of positive evaluation scale – Insights from a Dutch translation Cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder – A critical review of methodological designs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1