“他们在医学院从来没有提到过这件事!”从全科医学角度对医学生反思性写作的定性分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486
Bente Prytz Mjølstad, Linn Okkenhaug Getz
{"title":"“他们在医学院从来没有提到过这件事!”从全科医学角度对医学生反思性写作的定性分析。","authors":"Bente Prytz Mjølstad, Linn Okkenhaug Getz","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to identify final-year medical students' experiences with thought-provoking and challenging situations in general practice.</p><p><strong>Design setting and subjects: </strong>We conducted a qualitative analysis of 90 reflective essays written by one cohort of Norwegian final-year medical students during their internship in general practice in 2017. The students were asked to reflect upon a clinical encounter in general practice that had made a strong impression on them. A primary thematic content analysis was performed, followed by a secondary analysis of encounters that stood out as particularly challenging.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical scenarios in general practice that make students feel professionally 'caught off guard'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified several themes of challenging student experiences. One of these was 'disorienting encounters' for which the students felt totally unprepared in the sense that they did not know how to think and act. Five different scenarios were identified: (1) patients with highly distracting appearances, (2) 'ordinary consultations' that suddenly took a dramatic turn, (3) patients who appeared unexpectedly confrontational or devaluating, (4) scornful rejection of the young doctor's advice, and finally, (5) confusion related to massive contextual complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disorienting encounters stood out as particularly challenging clinical experiences for medical students in general practice. These scenarios evoked an acute feeling of incapacitation: not knowing what to think and do. Further curriculum development will focus on preparing the students to 'know what to do when they don't know what to do'.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'They never mentioned this in medical school!' A qualitative analysis of medical students' reflective writings from general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Bente Prytz Mjølstad, Linn Okkenhaug Getz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to identify final-year medical students' experiences with thought-provoking and challenging situations in general practice.</p><p><strong>Design setting and subjects: </strong>We conducted a qualitative analysis of 90 reflective essays written by one cohort of Norwegian final-year medical students during their internship in general practice in 2017. The students were asked to reflect upon a clinical encounter in general practice that had made a strong impression on them. A primary thematic content analysis was performed, followed by a secondary analysis of encounters that stood out as particularly challenging.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical scenarios in general practice that make students feel professionally 'caught off guard'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified several themes of challenging student experiences. One of these was 'disorienting encounters' for which the students felt totally unprepared in the sense that they did not know how to think and act. Five different scenarios were identified: (1) patients with highly distracting appearances, (2) 'ordinary consultations' that suddenly took a dramatic turn, (3) patients who appeared unexpectedly confrontational or devaluating, (4) scornful rejection of the young doctor's advice, and finally, (5) confusion related to massive contextual complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disorienting encounters stood out as particularly challenging clinical experiences for medical students in general practice. These scenarios evoked an acute feeling of incapacitation: not knowing what to think and do. Further curriculum development will focus on preparing the students to 'know what to do when they don't know what to do'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001360/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2263486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定大四医学生在全科医学中遇到发人深省和具有挑战性的情况的经历。设计背景和主题:我们对2017年挪威医学院大四学生在全科实习期间撰写的90篇反思性文章进行了定性分析。学生们被要求反思一次在全科医学中给他们留下深刻印象的临床遭遇。进行了一次主要的主题内容分析,然后对特别具有挑战性的遭遇进行了二次分析。主要结果指标:全科医学中让学生感到专业“措手不及”的临床场景。结果:该分析确定了具有挑战性的学生经历的几个主题。其中之一是“迷失方向的遭遇”,学生们感到完全没有准备,因为他们不知道如何思考和行动。确定了五种不同的情况:(1)表现出高度分散注意力的患者,(2)突然发生戏剧性转变的“普通会诊”,(3)表现出出乎意料的对抗或贬值的患者,4)轻蔑地拒绝年轻医生的建议,最后,(5)与巨大的上下文复杂性有关的困惑。结论:对于全科医学生来说,定向障碍是一种特别具有挑战性的临床体验。这些场景引发了一种强烈的丧失能力感:不知道该想什么、该做什么。进一步的课程开发将侧重于让学生“在不知道该做什么的时候知道该怎么做”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'They never mentioned this in medical school!' A qualitative analysis of medical students' reflective writings from general practice.

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify final-year medical students' experiences with thought-provoking and challenging situations in general practice.

Design setting and subjects: We conducted a qualitative analysis of 90 reflective essays written by one cohort of Norwegian final-year medical students during their internship in general practice in 2017. The students were asked to reflect upon a clinical encounter in general practice that had made a strong impression on them. A primary thematic content analysis was performed, followed by a secondary analysis of encounters that stood out as particularly challenging.

Main outcome measures: Clinical scenarios in general practice that make students feel professionally 'caught off guard'.

Results: The analysis identified several themes of challenging student experiences. One of these was 'disorienting encounters' for which the students felt totally unprepared in the sense that they did not know how to think and act. Five different scenarios were identified: (1) patients with highly distracting appearances, (2) 'ordinary consultations' that suddenly took a dramatic turn, (3) patients who appeared unexpectedly confrontational or devaluating, (4) scornful rejection of the young doctor's advice, and finally, (5) confusion related to massive contextual complexity.

Conclusions: Disorienting encounters stood out as particularly challenging clinical experiences for medical students in general practice. These scenarios evoked an acute feeling of incapacitation: not knowing what to think and do. Further curriculum development will focus on preparing the students to 'know what to do when they don't know what to do'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare seeking - who, when and why? Diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms in acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction. Is general practitioner involvement in the initiation of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain associated with opioid dose and concurrent drug use? The in- and outpatient health care use of patients with COPD before and after initiation of home care: a registry study from Norway. General practitioners’ knowledge and practice in consultations with (potential) torture victims: a qualitative pilot study from Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1