机构临床路径对急诊医生治疗低风险肺栓塞患者的陈述偏好的影响。

Q3 Medicine Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000333
Arvin Radfar Akhavan, Alex O'Brien-Lambert, Nick Postiglione, Anneliese M Schleyer, Marie Vrablik, M Kennedy Hall
{"title":"机构临床路径对急诊医生治疗低风险肺栓塞患者的陈述偏好的影响。","authors":"Arvin Radfar Akhavan, Alex O'Brien-Lambert, Nick Postiglione, Anneliese M Schleyer, Marie Vrablik, M Kennedy Hall","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence continues to accumulate that select patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely discharged from the emergency department. Despite this, outpatient management continues to be uncommon. We report changes in emergency providers' stated preferences on low-risk acute PE management before and after the development and implementation of an institutional clinical pathway and decision tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational analysis of attending emergency physicians' stated preferences towards the management of low-risk acute PE using survey results before and after the development and implementation of an electronic health record-embedded institutional low-risk acute PE pathway.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attending emergency medicine providers reported feeling more comfortable using PE risk stratification scores to identify dischargeable low-risk PE patients and also reported that they would be more likely to discharge a hypothetical patient with low-risk acute PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the implementation of an institutional clinical pathway with integration into the electronic health record was associated with a change in emergency physicians' stated preferences for managing patients with acute low-risk PE in the emergency department. Implementation of an evidence-based standard pathway was associated with increased comfort and familiarity with PE risk stratification, and an increased comfort with and preference for early outpatient management of low-risk PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"120-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of an Institutional Clinical Pathway on Emergency Physicians' Stated Preferences in Treating Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Arvin Radfar Akhavan, Alex O'Brien-Lambert, Nick Postiglione, Anneliese M Schleyer, Marie Vrablik, M Kennedy Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence continues to accumulate that select patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely discharged from the emergency department. Despite this, outpatient management continues to be uncommon. We report changes in emergency providers' stated preferences on low-risk acute PE management before and after the development and implementation of an institutional clinical pathway and decision tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational analysis of attending emergency physicians' stated preferences towards the management of low-risk acute PE using survey results before and after the development and implementation of an electronic health record-embedded institutional low-risk acute PE pathway.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attending emergency medicine providers reported feeling more comfortable using PE risk stratification scores to identify dischargeable low-risk PE patients and also reported that they would be more likely to discharge a hypothetical patient with low-risk acute PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the implementation of an institutional clinical pathway with integration into the electronic health record was associated with a change in emergency physicians' stated preferences for managing patients with acute low-risk PE in the emergency department. Implementation of an evidence-based standard pathway was associated with increased comfort and familiarity with PE risk stratification, and an increased comfort with and preference for early outpatient management of low-risk PE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Pathways in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Pathways in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不断积累的证据表明,选择患有急性低风险肺栓塞(PE)的患者可以安全地从急诊科出院。尽管如此,门诊管理仍然不常见。我们报告了在开发和实施机构临床途径和决策工具前后,急救提供者对低风险急性PE管理的偏好发生了变化。方法:我们使用嵌入机构低风险急性PE途径的电子健康记录开发和实施前后的调查结果,对急诊主治医生对低风险急性PE管理的既定偏好进行了观察性分析。结果:急诊医生报告说,使用PE风险分层评分来确定可出院的低风险PE患者,他们感觉更舒服,还报告说,他们更有可能让假设的低风险急性PE患者出院与EP对急诊科急性低风险PE患者管理偏好的变化有关。循证标准路径的实施与PE风险分层的舒适度和熟悉度增加有关,也与低风险PE早期门诊管理的舒适性和偏好增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of an Institutional Clinical Pathway on Emergency Physicians' Stated Preferences in Treating Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Background: Evidence continues to accumulate that select patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be safely discharged from the emergency department. Despite this, outpatient management continues to be uncommon. We report changes in emergency providers' stated preferences on low-risk acute PE management before and after the development and implementation of an institutional clinical pathway and decision tool.

Methods: We performed an observational analysis of attending emergency physicians' stated preferences towards the management of low-risk acute PE using survey results before and after the development and implementation of an electronic health record-embedded institutional low-risk acute PE pathway.

Results: Attending emergency medicine providers reported feeling more comfortable using PE risk stratification scores to identify dischargeable low-risk PE patients and also reported that they would be more likely to discharge a hypothetical patient with low-risk acute PE.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the implementation of an institutional clinical pathway with integration into the electronic health record was associated with a change in emergency physicians' stated preferences for managing patients with acute low-risk PE in the emergency department. Implementation of an evidence-based standard pathway was associated with increased comfort and familiarity with PE risk stratification, and an increased comfort with and preference for early outpatient management of low-risk PE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Aneurysms: A Patient-level Systematic Review. Rewarding twenty-year experience with initial and repeat EKG and echocardiographic screening for prevention of sudden death in detecting abnormal findings. Prevalence of some cardiovascular risk factors: obesity, hypertension, and smoking among medical students. Access to non-physician led Exercise Stress Echocardiography reduces wait times and improves consumer engagement. Advancements in Serum Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Aortic Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1