手术器械中的性别平等:环柄钳子的人体工程学。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533
Emiko Kono, Sachiyo Nomura, Takashi Sakamoto, Kae Okoshi, Chie Tanaka, Ken Shirabe, Sang-Woong Lee, Yuko Kitagawa
{"title":"手术器械中的性别平等:环柄钳子的人体工程学。","authors":"Emiko Kono, Sachiyo Nomura, Takashi Sakamoto, Kae Okoshi, Chie Tanaka, Ken Shirabe, Sang-Woong Lee, Yuko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female surgeons have ergonomic issues with commercialized instruments tailored for male surgeons. The purpose of this study was to identify satisfaction levels and ergonomic problems of female surgeons while using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles and suggest improvement measures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent to 19,405 members of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery <i>via</i> email between 1 August 2022 and 30 September 2022. It included demographic information and specific questions regarding the use of laparoscopic forceps with ring- handles (ergonomic evaluation, influence of the negative aspects of laparoscopic forceps during surgery, physical discomfort in the hands and fingers, degree of satisfaction, and handle size).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid responses were received from 1,030 respondents (131 female and 899 male surgeons). The ergonomics of the laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles were rated lower by female surgeons in all ten categories (all <i>p</i> value < 0.05). They also reported a negative impact on surgical manipulation and discomfort to their hands and fingers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female surgeons had a wide variety of ergonomic problems when using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles, and showed lower levels of satisfaction. Developing a different model tailored to female surgeons with smaller hands and a weaker grip could be a viable solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender equity in surgical instruments: ergonomics of ring-handled forceps.\",\"authors\":\"Emiko Kono, Sachiyo Nomura, Takashi Sakamoto, Kae Okoshi, Chie Tanaka, Ken Shirabe, Sang-Woong Lee, Yuko Kitagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female surgeons have ergonomic issues with commercialized instruments tailored for male surgeons. The purpose of this study was to identify satisfaction levels and ergonomic problems of female surgeons while using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles and suggest improvement measures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent to 19,405 members of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery <i>via</i> email between 1 August 2022 and 30 September 2022. It included demographic information and specific questions regarding the use of laparoscopic forceps with ring- handles (ergonomic evaluation, influence of the negative aspects of laparoscopic forceps during surgery, physical discomfort in the hands and fingers, degree of satisfaction, and handle size).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Valid responses were received from 1,030 respondents (131 female and 899 male surgeons). The ergonomics of the laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles were rated lower by female surgeons in all ten categories (all <i>p</i> value < 0.05). They also reported a negative impact on surgical manipulation and discomfort to their hands and fingers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female surgeons had a wide variety of ergonomic problems when using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles, and showed lower levels of satisfaction. Developing a different model tailored to female surgeons with smaller hands and a weaker grip could be a viable solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2023.2261533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:女性外科医生在为男性外科医生量身定制的商业化器械方面存在人体工程学问题。本研究的目的是确定女性外科医生在使用带环柄腹腔镜手术钳时的满意度和工效学问题,并提出改进措施。材料和方法:在2022年8月1日至2022年9月30日期间,通过电子邮件向19405名日本胃肠外科学会成员发送了一份问卷。它包括人口统计信息和关于使用带环柄腹腔镜手术钳的具体问题(人体工程学评估、手术期间腹腔镜手术钳负面影响、手和手指的身体不适、满意度和手柄尺寸)在所有十个类别中,女性外科医生对带环柄腹腔镜手术钳的人体工程学评分较低(均p值<0.05)。她们还报告了对手术操作的负面影响以及手和手指的不适。结论:女性外科医生在使用带环形手柄的腹腔镜手术钳时存在各种各样的人体工程学问题,并且满意度较低。开发一种适合手较小、握力较弱的女性外科医生的不同模型可能是一个可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender equity in surgical instruments: ergonomics of ring-handled forceps.

Introduction: Female surgeons have ergonomic issues with commercialized instruments tailored for male surgeons. The purpose of this study was to identify satisfaction levels and ergonomic problems of female surgeons while using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles and suggest improvement measures.

Material and methods: A questionnaire was sent to 19,405 members of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery via email between 1 August 2022 and 30 September 2022. It included demographic information and specific questions regarding the use of laparoscopic forceps with ring- handles (ergonomic evaluation, influence of the negative aspects of laparoscopic forceps during surgery, physical discomfort in the hands and fingers, degree of satisfaction, and handle size).

Results: Valid responses were received from 1,030 respondents (131 female and 899 male surgeons). The ergonomics of the laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles were rated lower by female surgeons in all ten categories (all p value < 0.05). They also reported a negative impact on surgical manipulation and discomfort to their hands and fingers.

Conclusions: Female surgeons had a wide variety of ergonomic problems when using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles, and showed lower levels of satisfaction. Developing a different model tailored to female surgeons with smaller hands and a weaker grip could be a viable solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Is colonic J-pouch superior to other reconstructive techniques after total mesorectal excision? A systematic review with meta-analysis. A new method for placental volume measurements using tracked 2D ultrasound and automatic image segmentation. A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Camera sheath with transformable head for minimally invasive surgical instruments. Partial splenic embolization with embosphere microspheres (700-900 µm) for the treatment of hypersplenism: comparison of selective superior splenic artery embolization and inferior splenic artery embolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1