巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省新冠肺炎免疫计划成功的障碍。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-21 DOI:10.22605/RRH7883
Belinda Flanagan, Kay Nevill, Camilla Sabok, Mimi Zilliacus, Jonathon Sward
{"title":"巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省新冠肺炎免疫计划成功的障碍。","authors":"Belinda Flanagan,&nbsp;Kay Nevill,&nbsp;Camilla Sabok,&nbsp;Mimi Zilliacus,&nbsp;Jonathon Sward","doi":"10.22605/RRH7883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the success of COVID-19 immunisation programs in New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Flanagan,&nbsp;Kay Nevill,&nbsp;Camilla Sabok,&nbsp;Mimi Zilliacus,&nbsp;Jonathon Sward\",\"doi\":\"10.22605/RRH7883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural and remote health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7883\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH7883","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:尽管巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)对新冠肺炎管理建议的公共卫生活动有指导意见,但社区疫苗犹豫已被确定为一个重大挑战。弱势群体,如老年人、儿童、生活在农村和偏远社区的人、社会经济弱势群体和已有某些疾病的人,受到新冠肺炎的影响不成比例。该项目旨在解决巴布亚新几内亚新爱尔兰省社区疫苗犹豫的原因。方法:为了了解疫苗犹豫的理由和社区内接种疫苗的意图,将混合方法与两种数据收集方法结合使用。首先,向社区成员提供了一项调查。该调查改编自两种预先存在的经验证的调查工具,即牛津新冠肺炎犹豫量表和牛津新冠肺炎疫苗信心和自满量表。社区领导人和医护人员被邀请参加半结构化访谈,以更详细地回答他们接受疫苗的经历。结果:共有181名来自新爱尔兰省的参与者接受了调查。尽管队列中的疫苗意识很高(86.7%),但总体疫苗接种率很低(7.2%)。尽管如此,只有27.6%的参与者表示,如果疫苗向他们提供,他们会接种疫苗。与会者对疫苗安全性、疫苗建议以及新冠肺炎病毒本身的真实性和起源表示担忧。宗教和政治影响加剧了社区成员对疫苗建议的不信任。一些社区成员表示,他们的社区多年来一直患有严重疾病,与其他疾病一样,表达了对病毒的宿命论接受。结论:疫苗犹豫是一个重大问题,有可能对人群健康产生负面影响。巴布亚新几内亚加强免疫接种计划的紧迫努力显而易见。预防性初级保健是国家的优先事项;然而,为了成功实施疫苗接种计划,需要完善的免疫接种计划,包括消除神话和错误信息的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to the success of COVID-19 immunisation programs in New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea.

Introduction: Although guidance exists for the public health activities recommended for the management of COVID-19 in Papua New Guinea (PNG), community vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a major challenge. Vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children, people living in rural and remote communities, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions are disproportionally affected by COVID-19. This project aimed to address the reasons for community vaccine hesitancy in New Ireland Province, PNG.

Methods: To understand the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate within the community, a mixed-methods approach was used in conjunction with two methods of data collection. First, a survey was provided to community members. The survey was adapted from two pre-existing validated survey instruments, the Oxford COVID-19 Hesitancy Scale and the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale. Community leaders and healthcare workers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to provide a more detailed response of their experience of vaccine acceptance.

Results: A total of 181 participants from New Ireland Province were surveyed. Although vaccine awareness among the cohort was high (86.7%), overall uptake of vaccination was low (7.2%). Despite this, only 27.6% of participants indicated they would receive the vaccine should it be made available to them. Participants had concerns regarding vaccine safety, vaccine advice, and the authenticity and origins of the COVID-19 virus itself. Religious and political influence compounded the mistrust community members had for vaccine recommendations. Some community members stated their community had suffered for many years with serious illness, expressing a fatalistic acceptance of the virus, as they do other illnesses.

Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy is a significant problem that has the potential to negatively affect population-level health. An urgent focused effort to strengthen immunisation programs in PNG is evident. Preventative primary health care is a national priority; however, for the successful delivery of vaccination initiatives, well-formed immunisation programs that include education that will dispel myths and misinformation are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with early-career GPs' retention as independent specialists in former training practices. Online SMART Recovery mutual-help groups: a comparison of the characteristics and experiences of men living in rural and urban regions of Australia. Promoting women's wellbeing through the Niska (Goose) Harvesting Program in subarctic Ontario, Canada. Towards the new primary care reform in Greece: a focus on patients' expectations, views and perceptions from rural healthcare centres. What do nurses practising in rural, remote and isolated locations consider important for attraction and retention? A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1