年龄相关和通用信息图对参加宫颈筛查的知识、态度和意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12695
Frances Waite, Laura A. V. Marlow, Martin Nemec, Jo Waller
{"title":"年龄相关和通用信息图对参加宫颈筛查的知识、态度和意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Frances Waite,&nbsp;Laura A. V. Marlow,&nbsp;Martin Nemec,&nbsp;Jo Waller","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Cervical screening uptake in England is falling. Infographics could strengthen intention to attend, increase positive attitudes and improve knowledge. Age targeting could improve these outcomes further. We tested the impact of generic and age-targeted infographics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A randomized controlled trial using an age-stratified, parallel-group design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Women aged 25–64 (<i>n</i> = 2095) were recruited through an online panel and randomized to see one of the three infographics. We tested: (i) impact of a generic cervical screening infographic compared to a control infographic on an unrelated topic with all screening age women and (ii) impact of an age-targeted infographic compared to a generic cervical screening infographic with older women (50–64 years). Intentions, knowledge and attitudes were measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Women aged 25–64 years who viewed the generic infographic had significantly higher intentions [<i>F</i>(1, 1513) = 6.14, <i>p</i> = .013, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> = .004], more accurate beliefs about the timeline of cervical cancer development (OR: 5.18, 95% CI: 3.86–6.95), more accurate social norms (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.38–3.87) and more positive beliefs about screening benefits (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.52–3.28) than those viewing the control infographic. In the older age group, there was no significant difference in intention between those viewing the generic versus age-targeted versions [<i>F</i>(1, 607) = .03, <i>p</i> = .853, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> &lt; .001], but the age-targeted version was more engaging [<i>F</i>(1, 608) = 9.41, <i>p</i> = .002, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>η</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> = .015].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A cervical screening infographic can result in more positive attitudes and better knowledge and may have a small impact on intentions. Although age targeting did not affect intention, it had a positive impact on engagement and may therefore be useful in encouraging women to read and process materials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 1","pages":"204-220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12695","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of age-relevant and generic infographics on knowledge, attitudes and intention to attend cervical screening: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Frances Waite,&nbsp;Laura A. V. Marlow,&nbsp;Martin Nemec,&nbsp;Jo Waller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cervical screening uptake in England is falling. Infographics could strengthen intention to attend, increase positive attitudes and improve knowledge. Age targeting could improve these outcomes further. We tested the impact of generic and age-targeted infographics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A randomized controlled trial using an age-stratified, parallel-group design.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women aged 25–64 (<i>n</i> = 2095) were recruited through an online panel and randomized to see one of the three infographics. We tested: (i) impact of a generic cervical screening infographic compared to a control infographic on an unrelated topic with all screening age women and (ii) impact of an age-targeted infographic compared to a generic cervical screening infographic with older women (50–64 years). Intentions, knowledge and attitudes were measured.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women aged 25–64 years who viewed the generic infographic had significantly higher intentions [<i>F</i>(1, 1513) = 6.14, <i>p</i> = .013, <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n <mi>p</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math> = .004], more accurate beliefs about the timeline of cervical cancer development (OR: 5.18, 95% CI: 3.86–6.95), more accurate social norms (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.38–3.87) and more positive beliefs about screening benefits (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.52–3.28) than those viewing the control infographic. In the older age group, there was no significant difference in intention between those viewing the generic versus age-targeted versions [<i>F</i>(1, 607) = .03, <i>p</i> = .853, <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n <mi>p</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math> &lt; .001], but the age-targeted version was more engaging [<i>F</i>(1, 608) = 9.41, <i>p</i> = .002, <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>η</mi>\\n <mi>p</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math> = .015].</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cervical screening infographic can result in more positive attitudes and better knowledge and may have a small impact on intentions. Although age targeting did not affect intention, it had a positive impact on engagement and may therefore be useful in encouraging women to read and process materials.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"204-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12695\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12695\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:英国的宫颈筛查率正在下降。信息图表可以增强参加的意愿,提高积极的态度,提高知识。年龄定位可以进一步改善这些结果。我们测试了通用和针对年龄的信息图的影响。设计:采用年龄分层、平行组设计的随机对照试验。方法:25-64岁的女性(n = 2095)通过在线小组招募,并随机查看三张信息图中的一张。我们测试了:(i)与对照信息图相比,普通宫颈筛查信息图对所有筛查年龄女性无关主题的影响;(ii)与老年女性(50-64 年)。对意图、知识和态度进行了衡量。结果:25-64岁的女性 查看通用信息图的年份有更高的意图[F(1513) = 6.14,p = .013,ηp 2$$ = .004],与对照信息图相比,对子宫颈癌症发展时间线的信念更准确(OR:5.18,95%CI:3.86-6.95),更准确的社会规范(OR:3.03,95%CI:2.38-3.87),对筛查益处的信念更积极(OR:2.23,95%CI:1.52-3.28)。在老年组中,观看通用版本和针对年龄的版本的人在意向上没有显著差异[F(1607) = .03,p = .853,ηp 2$$  ηp 2$$ = .015]。结论:宫颈筛查信息图可以带来更积极的态度和更好的知识,并可能对意向产生较小影响。尽管年龄目标不影响意向,但它对参与产生了积极影响,因此可能有助于鼓励妇女阅读和处理材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of age-relevant and generic infographics on knowledge, attitudes and intention to attend cervical screening: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives

Cervical screening uptake in England is falling. Infographics could strengthen intention to attend, increase positive attitudes and improve knowledge. Age targeting could improve these outcomes further. We tested the impact of generic and age-targeted infographics.

Design

A randomized controlled trial using an age-stratified, parallel-group design.

Methods

Women aged 25–64 (n = 2095) were recruited through an online panel and randomized to see one of the three infographics. We tested: (i) impact of a generic cervical screening infographic compared to a control infographic on an unrelated topic with all screening age women and (ii) impact of an age-targeted infographic compared to a generic cervical screening infographic with older women (50–64 years). Intentions, knowledge and attitudes were measured.

Results

Women aged 25–64 years who viewed the generic infographic had significantly higher intentions [F(1, 1513) = 6.14, p = .013, η p 2  = .004], more accurate beliefs about the timeline of cervical cancer development (OR: 5.18, 95% CI: 3.86–6.95), more accurate social norms (OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.38–3.87) and more positive beliefs about screening benefits (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.52–3.28) than those viewing the control infographic. In the older age group, there was no significant difference in intention between those viewing the generic versus age-targeted versions [F(1, 607) = .03, p = .853, η p 2  < .001], but the age-targeted version was more engaging [F(1, 608) = 9.41, p = .002, η p 2  = .015].

Conclusions

A cervical screening infographic can result in more positive attitudes and better knowledge and may have a small impact on intentions. Although age targeting did not affect intention, it had a positive impact on engagement and may therefore be useful in encouraging women to read and process materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions. Issue Information Determinants of child body weight categorization in parents and health care professionals: An experimental study. Online support groups for family caregivers: A qualitative exploration of social support and engagement. Self-compassion and psychological distress in chronic illness: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1