{"title":"随着永久冻土生态系统的变暖,植物群落特征变得更具获取性。","authors":"Clydecia M. Spitzer, Gesche Blume-Werry","doi":"10.1111/nph.19286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Permafrost is thawing, as a result of both increasing temperatures and snow depth. Temperatures in permafrost are increasing at 0.3–1°C per decade, possibly accelerating as global warming progresses (Smith <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>), leading to estimated losses of over 40% of permafrost area even if warming is stabilized at 2°C (Chadburn <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). This rapid warming might not only lead to large losses of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) previously locked up in frozen soil layers but will also inevitably influence plant communities growing in the increasingly deeper layer of seasonally thawed soil above the permafrost. How plant community traits respond to the release of nutrients from warming permafrost could have important implications for carbon and nutrient cycling in these ecosystems. Plant communities are adapted to the harsh climate in permafrost areas, with roots growing in the thawed but still cold soil layers above the permafrost. But what happens when soils above permafrost warm? How do plant communities and their traits respond? Are plant trait responses coordinated above- and belowground? These are some key questions that are tackled in an recently published article by Wei <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>; 1802–1816), published in this issue of <i>New Phytologist</i>.</p><p>Plant traits and their values are important for understanding community responses to global change. For example, in resource-limited or harsh conditions, plant communities have been found to either have more acquisitive traits that promote the acquisition of resources (e.g. finer roots and higher nitrogen content), or conservative traits, such as thicker roots and lower nitrogen content (Laughlin <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Indeed, multiple studies have been conducted along elevational gradients to understand the relationship between plant traits and temperature (e.g. Weemstra <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Spitzer <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). These studies have shown that although some species have clear elevational trait value responses, at the community level there are idiosyncratic relationships with elevation, probably due to the spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear nutrient dynamics along natural gradients. Wei <i>et al</i>.'s study directly tests the effects of warming on permafrost-affected soils, which resulted in increased net soil N mineralization and nitrate concentrations. This shifted plant community traits to more acquisitive values both above- and belowground, for example, higher specific root length, higher root N concentration, higher specific leaf area, and photosynthetic N use efficiency. Previous studies have found strong links between experimental warming and increased N content in plant tissues (Jónsdóttir <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). However, this study from Wei <i>et al</i>. shows a strong coordinated shift towards acquisitive strategies in both above- and belowground tissues in the plant communities under experimental warming, although tissue density had opposing responses above- and belowground. This study therefore provides an important mechanistic link between the warming of permafrost soils and plant community trait responses.</p><p>Plant trait research has progressed rapidly over the past decades, but with a much stronger focus on aboveground traits. Recently, there is a much better understanding of trait variation belowground, that is, ‘the root trait space’, as well as aboveground, that is, ‘the leaf economic spectrum’; however, whether there is trait coordination between leaf and root tissue is currently being debated (Carmona <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Weigelt <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>, <span>2023</span>). Wei <i>et al</i>. go beyond the discussion about trait coordination with an exciting approach to investigating trait networks based on previous work by Messier <i>et al</i>. (<span>2017</span>). Specifically, they examine whether they could identify hub traits (i.e. traits that are correlated to several other traits), which may be important for plant response to environmental change factors, such as increased soil temperature or available nutrients. This is because a change in hub traits could likely cause cascading effects on other traits in response to environmental change (Kleyer <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>; Rao <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). First, they measured 26 plant functional traits (i.e. phenological, morphological, chemical, and photosynthetic traits). They found that the hub trait under ambient conditions was specific root area, which is not surprising as permafrost ecosystems are characterized by a generally large proportion of belowground relative to aboveground biomass. Interestingly, under warming they found that trait centrality (i.e. the hub trait) shifted from specific root area to leaf area, but that there were very minor shifts in the connectivity of trait networks. This suggests that the plant communities shifted towards larger leaf area as a means of adapting to light competition aboveground under more favourable belowground conditions, but that there were no obvious cascading effects on other plant traits.</p><p>Another key aspect of plant community trait response to warming is their intraspecific trait variability. Wei <i>et al</i>. found that in their species-poor site, intraspecific trait variation contributed substantially to the total variation in community-weighted trait means, and their associated trait responses to warming. This is consistent with recent studies at other species-poor sites for leaf and root traits (Jónsdóttir <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>; Spitzer <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). High intraspecific variation in plant communities enables a rapid response to environmental change or newly available resources without a change in species composition. This suggests that trait plasticity plays an important role in these ecosystems as a means of adaptation to environmental change. It further strengthens the evidence for the importance of intraspecific trait variability in species-poor ecosystems relative to species turnover in response to environmental change. However, Wei <i>et al</i>. measured traits on the four most dominant species in their system, all of which are sedges. Graminoids generally tend to be more responsive to environmental change compared with slower growing, more conservative shrubs (Veen (Ciska) <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), and it thus remains unclear whether similar patterns are observed in more functionally diverse communities that include shrubs common in permafrost ecosystems. Indeed, many permafrost areas show strong changes in species composition in response to warming, with particular increases in shrub abundance and productivity, at least in relatively drier, upland areas (Heijmans <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>The study by Wei <i>et al</i>. paves the way for many new questions related to plant community trait responses in warming permafrost ecosystems. First, how long do permafrost ecosystems need to be warmed before effects are seen, and how long will these effects last? Wei <i>et al</i>. conducted a 7-year warming experiment and found increased net soil N mineralization and higher soil nitrate concentration. What would be the effects of much longer term warming on soil nutrient availability and what implications would this have for plant communities and their traits? How would more species-diverse plant communities with graminoids and shrubs respond? A second exciting line of inquiry is how plant–microbe interactions are influenced by warming permafrost. For example, the extent to which plant trait shifts drive microbial community development over time or influence fungal : bacterial ratios in soil needs further investigation. These interactions could have implications for soil carbon storage and may be important for mitigating C loss in warming permafrost. At the same time, trait shifts to plant tissue with higher nutrient content could influence the activity of decomposers and speed up nutrient cycling rates in the warmer permafrost. There is therefore a need for decomposition experiments in thawed permafrost. Third, will community composition and species diversity shift, or, if community composition stays similar, will trait values still shift further in response to longer term warming? Many questions remain about the longer term effects, but Wei <i>et al</i>. have provided key insights into understanding plant community responses to warming in permafrost ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"240 5","pages":"1712-1713"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"As a permafrost ecosystem warms, plant community traits become more acquisitive\",\"authors\":\"Clydecia M. Spitzer, Gesche Blume-Werry\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.19286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Permafrost is thawing, as a result of both increasing temperatures and snow depth. Temperatures in permafrost are increasing at 0.3–1°C per decade, possibly accelerating as global warming progresses (Smith <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>), leading to estimated losses of over 40% of permafrost area even if warming is stabilized at 2°C (Chadburn <i>et al</i>., <span>2017</span>). This rapid warming might not only lead to large losses of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) previously locked up in frozen soil layers but will also inevitably influence plant communities growing in the increasingly deeper layer of seasonally thawed soil above the permafrost. How plant community traits respond to the release of nutrients from warming permafrost could have important implications for carbon and nutrient cycling in these ecosystems. Plant communities are adapted to the harsh climate in permafrost areas, with roots growing in the thawed but still cold soil layers above the permafrost. But what happens when soils above permafrost warm? How do plant communities and their traits respond? Are plant trait responses coordinated above- and belowground? These are some key questions that are tackled in an recently published article by Wei <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>; 1802–1816), published in this issue of <i>New Phytologist</i>.</p><p>Plant traits and their values are important for understanding community responses to global change. For example, in resource-limited or harsh conditions, plant communities have been found to either have more acquisitive traits that promote the acquisition of resources (e.g. finer roots and higher nitrogen content), or conservative traits, such as thicker roots and lower nitrogen content (Laughlin <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>). Indeed, multiple studies have been conducted along elevational gradients to understand the relationship between plant traits and temperature (e.g. Weemstra <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Spitzer <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). These studies have shown that although some species have clear elevational trait value responses, at the community level there are idiosyncratic relationships with elevation, probably due to the spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear nutrient dynamics along natural gradients. Wei <i>et al</i>.'s study directly tests the effects of warming on permafrost-affected soils, which resulted in increased net soil N mineralization and nitrate concentrations. This shifted plant community traits to more acquisitive values both above- and belowground, for example, higher specific root length, higher root N concentration, higher specific leaf area, and photosynthetic N use efficiency. Previous studies have found strong links between experimental warming and increased N content in plant tissues (Jónsdóttir <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). However, this study from Wei <i>et al</i>. shows a strong coordinated shift towards acquisitive strategies in both above- and belowground tissues in the plant communities under experimental warming, although tissue density had opposing responses above- and belowground. This study therefore provides an important mechanistic link between the warming of permafrost soils and plant community trait responses.</p><p>Plant trait research has progressed rapidly over the past decades, but with a much stronger focus on aboveground traits. Recently, there is a much better understanding of trait variation belowground, that is, ‘the root trait space’, as well as aboveground, that is, ‘the leaf economic spectrum’; however, whether there is trait coordination between leaf and root tissue is currently being debated (Carmona <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Weigelt <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>, <span>2023</span>). Wei <i>et al</i>. go beyond the discussion about trait coordination with an exciting approach to investigating trait networks based on previous work by Messier <i>et al</i>. (<span>2017</span>). Specifically, they examine whether they could identify hub traits (i.e. traits that are correlated to several other traits), which may be important for plant response to environmental change factors, such as increased soil temperature or available nutrients. This is because a change in hub traits could likely cause cascading effects on other traits in response to environmental change (Kleyer <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>; Rao <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). First, they measured 26 plant functional traits (i.e. phenological, morphological, chemical, and photosynthetic traits). They found that the hub trait under ambient conditions was specific root area, which is not surprising as permafrost ecosystems are characterized by a generally large proportion of belowground relative to aboveground biomass. Interestingly, under warming they found that trait centrality (i.e. the hub trait) shifted from specific root area to leaf area, but that there were very minor shifts in the connectivity of trait networks. This suggests that the plant communities shifted towards larger leaf area as a means of adapting to light competition aboveground under more favourable belowground conditions, but that there were no obvious cascading effects on other plant traits.</p><p>Another key aspect of plant community trait response to warming is their intraspecific trait variability. Wei <i>et al</i>. found that in their species-poor site, intraspecific trait variation contributed substantially to the total variation in community-weighted trait means, and their associated trait responses to warming. This is consistent with recent studies at other species-poor sites for leaf and root traits (Jónsdóttir <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>; Spitzer <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). High intraspecific variation in plant communities enables a rapid response to environmental change or newly available resources without a change in species composition. This suggests that trait plasticity plays an important role in these ecosystems as a means of adaptation to environmental change. It further strengthens the evidence for the importance of intraspecific trait variability in species-poor ecosystems relative to species turnover in response to environmental change. However, Wei <i>et al</i>. measured traits on the four most dominant species in their system, all of which are sedges. Graminoids generally tend to be more responsive to environmental change compared with slower growing, more conservative shrubs (Veen (Ciska) <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>), and it thus remains unclear whether similar patterns are observed in more functionally diverse communities that include shrubs common in permafrost ecosystems. Indeed, many permafrost areas show strong changes in species composition in response to warming, with particular increases in shrub abundance and productivity, at least in relatively drier, upland areas (Heijmans <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>).</p><p>The study by Wei <i>et al</i>. paves the way for many new questions related to plant community trait responses in warming permafrost ecosystems. First, how long do permafrost ecosystems need to be warmed before effects are seen, and how long will these effects last? Wei <i>et al</i>. conducted a 7-year warming experiment and found increased net soil N mineralization and higher soil nitrate concentration. What would be the effects of much longer term warming on soil nutrient availability and what implications would this have for plant communities and their traits? How would more species-diverse plant communities with graminoids and shrubs respond? A second exciting line of inquiry is how plant–microbe interactions are influenced by warming permafrost. For example, the extent to which plant trait shifts drive microbial community development over time or influence fungal : bacterial ratios in soil needs further investigation. These interactions could have implications for soil carbon storage and may be important for mitigating C loss in warming permafrost. At the same time, trait shifts to plant tissue with higher nutrient content could influence the activity of decomposers and speed up nutrient cycling rates in the warmer permafrost. There is therefore a need for decomposition experiments in thawed permafrost. Third, will community composition and species diversity shift, or, if community composition stays similar, will trait values still shift further in response to longer term warming? Many questions remain about the longer term effects, but Wei <i>et al</i>. have provided key insights into understanding plant community responses to warming in permafrost ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":\"240 5\",\"pages\":\"1712-1713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19286\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.19286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于气温升高和积雪深度增加,永久冻土正在融化。永久冻土区的温度正以每十年0.3-1°C的速度上升,并可能随着全球变暖的进展而加速(Smith等人,2022年),即使升温稳定在2°C,估计也会导致超过40%的永久冻土区损失(Chadburn等人,2017年)。这种快速变暖不仅可能导致以前锁在冻土中的碳(C)和氮(N)的大量损失,而且还将不可避免地影响在永久冻土上方季节性解冻的土壤中越来越深的土层中生长的植物群落。植物群落特征如何响应从变暖的永久冻土中释放的养分,可能对这些生态系统中的碳和养分循环具有重要意义。植物群落适应了永久冻土区的恶劣气候,根系生长在永久冻土区上方解冻但仍然寒冷的土层中。但是当永久冻土以上的土壤变暖时会发生什么呢?植物群落和它们的性状是如何反应的?植物的性状反应在地上和地下是否协调?这些是Wei等人最近发表的一篇文章中解决的一些关键问题。1802-1816),发表在本期的《新植物学家》上。植物性状及其价值对了解植物群落对全球变化的响应具有重要意义。例如,在资源有限或恶劣的条件下,植物群落要么具有更多促进资源获取的获取性状(如根细、氮含量高),要么具有更保守的性状(如根粗、氮含量低)(Laughlin et al., 2021)。事实上,已经沿着海拔梯度进行了多项研究,以了解植物性状与温度之间的关系(例如Weemstra et al., 2021;斯皮策等人,2023)。这些研究表明,尽管一些物种具有明显的海拔性状值响应,但在群落水平上,可能由于空间异质性和沿自然梯度的非线性营养动态而与海拔存在特异性关系。Wei等人的研究直接测试了变暖对受永久冻土影响的土壤的影响,导致土壤净N矿化和硝酸盐浓度增加。这使得植物群落性状在地上和地下都向更高的比根长、更高的根氮浓度、更高的比叶面积和光合氮利用效率转移。先前的研究发现,实验升温与植物组织中氮含量增加之间存在密切联系(Jónsdóttir et al., 2023)。然而,Wei等人的这项研究表明,在实验变暖条件下,植物群落的地上和地下组织都向获取策略发生了强烈的协调转变,尽管地上和地下的组织密度有相反的反应。因此,本研究提供了冻土变暖与植物群落性状响应之间的重要机制联系。在过去的几十年里,植物性状研究进展迅速,但对地上性状的关注更为强烈。最近,人们对地下性状变异(即“根性状空间”)和地上性状变异(即“叶经济谱”)有了更好的了解;然而,叶和根组织之间是否存在性状协调目前仍存在争议(Carmona et al., 2021;Weigelt et al., 2021, 2023)。Wei等人超越了对性状协调的讨论,采用了一种令人兴奋的方法来研究基于Messier等人(2017)先前工作的性状网络。具体来说,他们研究了他们是否可以识别中心性状(即与其他几个性状相关的性状),这可能对植物对环境变化因素(如土壤温度升高或可用养分)的反应很重要。这是因为枢纽性状的变化可能会对其他性状产生级联效应,以响应环境变化(Kleyer等人,2019;Rao等人,2023)。首先,他们测量了26种植物的功能性状(物候、形态、化学和光合性状)。他们发现,环境条件下的中心特征是特定的根面积,这并不奇怪,因为永久冻土生态系统的特点是相对于地上的生物量,地下的生物量通常占很大比例。有趣的是,在变暖的情况下,他们发现性状中心性(即枢纽性状)从特定的根区域转移到叶区域,但性状网络的连通性发生了非常小的变化。这表明,在更有利的地下条件下,植物群落转向更大的叶面积作为适应地上光竞争的一种手段,但对其他植物性状没有明显的级联效应。 植物群落性状响应变暖的另一个关键方面是它们的种内性状变异性。Wei等人发现,在物种贫乏的地点,种内性状变异在很大程度上影响了群落加权性状均值的总变异,以及它们对变暖的相关性状反应。这与最近在其他物种缺乏叶和根性状的地点进行的研究一致(Jónsdóttir et al., 2023;斯皮策等人,2023)。植物群落的高种内变异使其能够在不改变物种组成的情况下对环境变化或新资源作出快速反应。这表明性状可塑性作为一种适应环境变化的手段在这些生态系统中起着重要作用。它进一步加强了物种贫乏生态系统中相对于响应环境变化的物种更替的种内性状变异的重要性的证据。然而,Wei等人测量了他们系统中四个最优势物种的性状,这些物种都是莎草。与生长较慢、更保守的灌木相比,禾草类植物通常对环境变化更敏感(Veen (Ciska) et al., 2015),因此,目前尚不清楚在功能更多样化的群落(包括永久冻土生态系统中常见的灌木)中是否观察到类似的模式。事实上,许多永久冻土区在物种组成方面表现出对变暖的强烈变化,特别是灌木丰度和生产力的增加,至少在相对干燥的高地地区(Heijmans et al., 2022)。Wei等人的研究为许多与变暖的永久冻土生态系统中植物群落性状响应相关的新问题铺平了道路。首先,永久冻土生态系统需要变暖多久才能看到影响,这些影响将持续多久?Wei等进行了为期7年的增温实验,发现土壤净氮矿化增加,土壤硝酸盐浓度升高。长期的变暖对土壤养分的影响是什么?这对植物群落和它们的特性有什么影响?拥有禾本科植物和灌木的物种多样性更强的植物群落将如何应对?第二个令人兴奋的研究方向是永久冻土变暖如何影响植物与微生物的相互作用。例如,随着时间的推移,植物性状变化在多大程度上推动微生物群落的发展或影响土壤中真菌和细菌的比例,需要进一步研究。这些相互作用可能对土壤碳储量产生影响,并可能对减轻变暖的永久冻土中的碳损失很重要。同时,性状向养分含量较高的植物组织转移会影响分解者的活动,加快永久冻土中养分循环速率。因此,有必要在解冻的永久冻土中进行分解实验。第三,群落组成和物种多样性是否会发生变化,或者,如果群落组成保持相似,性状值是否会随着长期变暖而进一步变化?关于长期影响仍存在许多问题,但Wei等人已经为理解永久冻土生态系统中植物群落对变暖的反应提供了关键见解。
As a permafrost ecosystem warms, plant community traits become more acquisitive
Permafrost is thawing, as a result of both increasing temperatures and snow depth. Temperatures in permafrost are increasing at 0.3–1°C per decade, possibly accelerating as global warming progresses (Smith et al., 2022), leading to estimated losses of over 40% of permafrost area even if warming is stabilized at 2°C (Chadburn et al., 2017). This rapid warming might not only lead to large losses of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) previously locked up in frozen soil layers but will also inevitably influence plant communities growing in the increasingly deeper layer of seasonally thawed soil above the permafrost. How plant community traits respond to the release of nutrients from warming permafrost could have important implications for carbon and nutrient cycling in these ecosystems. Plant communities are adapted to the harsh climate in permafrost areas, with roots growing in the thawed but still cold soil layers above the permafrost. But what happens when soils above permafrost warm? How do plant communities and their traits respond? Are plant trait responses coordinated above- and belowground? These are some key questions that are tackled in an recently published article by Wei et al. (2023; 1802–1816), published in this issue of New Phytologist.
Plant traits and their values are important for understanding community responses to global change. For example, in resource-limited or harsh conditions, plant communities have been found to either have more acquisitive traits that promote the acquisition of resources (e.g. finer roots and higher nitrogen content), or conservative traits, such as thicker roots and lower nitrogen content (Laughlin et al., 2021). Indeed, multiple studies have been conducted along elevational gradients to understand the relationship between plant traits and temperature (e.g. Weemstra et al., 2021; Spitzer et al., 2023). These studies have shown that although some species have clear elevational trait value responses, at the community level there are idiosyncratic relationships with elevation, probably due to the spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear nutrient dynamics along natural gradients. Wei et al.'s study directly tests the effects of warming on permafrost-affected soils, which resulted in increased net soil N mineralization and nitrate concentrations. This shifted plant community traits to more acquisitive values both above- and belowground, for example, higher specific root length, higher root N concentration, higher specific leaf area, and photosynthetic N use efficiency. Previous studies have found strong links between experimental warming and increased N content in plant tissues (Jónsdóttir et al., 2023). However, this study from Wei et al. shows a strong coordinated shift towards acquisitive strategies in both above- and belowground tissues in the plant communities under experimental warming, although tissue density had opposing responses above- and belowground. This study therefore provides an important mechanistic link between the warming of permafrost soils and plant community trait responses.
Plant trait research has progressed rapidly over the past decades, but with a much stronger focus on aboveground traits. Recently, there is a much better understanding of trait variation belowground, that is, ‘the root trait space’, as well as aboveground, that is, ‘the leaf economic spectrum’; however, whether there is trait coordination between leaf and root tissue is currently being debated (Carmona et al., 2021; Weigelt et al., 2021, 2023). Wei et al. go beyond the discussion about trait coordination with an exciting approach to investigating trait networks based on previous work by Messier et al. (2017). Specifically, they examine whether they could identify hub traits (i.e. traits that are correlated to several other traits), which may be important for plant response to environmental change factors, such as increased soil temperature or available nutrients. This is because a change in hub traits could likely cause cascading effects on other traits in response to environmental change (Kleyer et al., 2019; Rao et al., 2023). First, they measured 26 plant functional traits (i.e. phenological, morphological, chemical, and photosynthetic traits). They found that the hub trait under ambient conditions was specific root area, which is not surprising as permafrost ecosystems are characterized by a generally large proportion of belowground relative to aboveground biomass. Interestingly, under warming they found that trait centrality (i.e. the hub trait) shifted from specific root area to leaf area, but that there were very minor shifts in the connectivity of trait networks. This suggests that the plant communities shifted towards larger leaf area as a means of adapting to light competition aboveground under more favourable belowground conditions, but that there were no obvious cascading effects on other plant traits.
Another key aspect of plant community trait response to warming is their intraspecific trait variability. Wei et al. found that in their species-poor site, intraspecific trait variation contributed substantially to the total variation in community-weighted trait means, and their associated trait responses to warming. This is consistent with recent studies at other species-poor sites for leaf and root traits (Jónsdóttir et al., 2023; Spitzer et al., 2023). High intraspecific variation in plant communities enables a rapid response to environmental change or newly available resources without a change in species composition. This suggests that trait plasticity plays an important role in these ecosystems as a means of adaptation to environmental change. It further strengthens the evidence for the importance of intraspecific trait variability in species-poor ecosystems relative to species turnover in response to environmental change. However, Wei et al. measured traits on the four most dominant species in their system, all of which are sedges. Graminoids generally tend to be more responsive to environmental change compared with slower growing, more conservative shrubs (Veen (Ciska) et al., 2015), and it thus remains unclear whether similar patterns are observed in more functionally diverse communities that include shrubs common in permafrost ecosystems. Indeed, many permafrost areas show strong changes in species composition in response to warming, with particular increases in shrub abundance and productivity, at least in relatively drier, upland areas (Heijmans et al., 2022).
The study by Wei et al. paves the way for many new questions related to plant community trait responses in warming permafrost ecosystems. First, how long do permafrost ecosystems need to be warmed before effects are seen, and how long will these effects last? Wei et al. conducted a 7-year warming experiment and found increased net soil N mineralization and higher soil nitrate concentration. What would be the effects of much longer term warming on soil nutrient availability and what implications would this have for plant communities and their traits? How would more species-diverse plant communities with graminoids and shrubs respond? A second exciting line of inquiry is how plant–microbe interactions are influenced by warming permafrost. For example, the extent to which plant trait shifts drive microbial community development over time or influence fungal : bacterial ratios in soil needs further investigation. These interactions could have implications for soil carbon storage and may be important for mitigating C loss in warming permafrost. At the same time, trait shifts to plant tissue with higher nutrient content could influence the activity of decomposers and speed up nutrient cycling rates in the warmer permafrost. There is therefore a need for decomposition experiments in thawed permafrost. Third, will community composition and species diversity shift, or, if community composition stays similar, will trait values still shift further in response to longer term warming? Many questions remain about the longer term effects, but Wei et al. have provided key insights into understanding plant community responses to warming in permafrost ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.