{"title":"子宫颈癌症腔内近距离放射治疗直肠剂量还原技术的剂量比较:回顾性分析。","authors":"Masafumi Sawada, Yutaka Shiraishi, Hirofumi Toyama, Tomoki Tanaka, Ryuichi Kota, Naoyuki Shigematsu","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2023.130842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D<sub>90</sub>) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm<sup>3</sup> of other organs at risk (D<sub>2cm<sup>3</sup></sub>) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D<sub>90</sub> of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.172). The D<sub>2cm<sup>3</sup></sub> values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"15 4","pages":"269-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/cf/JCB-15-51322.PMC10548429.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Masafumi Sawada, Yutaka Shiraishi, Hirofumi Toyama, Tomoki Tanaka, Ryuichi Kota, Naoyuki Shigematsu\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2023.130842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D<sub>90</sub>) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm<sup>3</sup> of other organs at risk (D<sub>2cm<sup>3</sup></sub>) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D<sub>90</sub> of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.172). The D<sub>2cm<sup>3</sup></sub> values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"269-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/cf/JCB-15-51322.PMC10548429.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis.
Purpose: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.
Material and methods: We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D90) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm3 of other organs at risk (D2cm3) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography.
Results: There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D90 of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, p = 0.172). The D2cm3 values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, p = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR.
Conclusions: VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV.
期刊介绍:
The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.