根据中毒类型和地高辛抗体给药,西班牙急诊科就诊的地高辛毒性特征:DIGITOX研究。

August Supervía, Andrea Martínez Baladrón, Francisca Córdoba, Francisco Callado, Victoria Lobo Antuña, Jordi Puiguriguer, Elena Fuentes, Valle Molina Samper, Antonio F Caballero-Bermejo, Susana Vert, Francisco Ruíz-Ruíz, F Javier Guijarro Eguinoa, Beatriz Martín-Pérez, Samuel Olmos, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, María Teresa Maza Vera, Oriol Pallàs, Benjamín Climent, Maider Igartua Astibia, Edith Gutiérrez, Santiago Nogué, Ana Ferrer Dufol
{"title":"根据中毒类型和地高辛抗体给药,西班牙急诊科就诊的地高辛毒性特征:DIGITOX研究。","authors":"August Supervía, Andrea Martínez Baladrón, Francisca Córdoba, Francisco Callado, Victoria Lobo Antuña, Jordi Puiguriguer, Elena Fuentes, Valle Molina Samper, Antonio F Caballero-Bermejo, Susana Vert, Francisco Ruíz-Ruíz, F Javier Guijarro Eguinoa, Beatriz Martín-Pérez, Samuel Olmos, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, María Teresa Maza Vera, Oriol Pallàs, Benjamín Climent, Maider Igartua Astibia, Edith Gutiérrez, Santiago Nogué, Ana Ferrer Dufol","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digoxin toxicity accounts for a small percentage of poisonings attended by emergency departments. This study aimed to describe differences between acute and chronic digoxin toxicity and assess the use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (digoxin-Fab) as an antidote.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective, observational, multicenter study in 15 hospital emergency departments in 8 Spanish autonomous communities in 7 years. We collected patient, clinical and treatment variables, and discharge destination. Patients were classified according to whether toxicity was acute or chronic and whether digoxin-Fab was administered or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven acute and 631 chronic digoxin poisonings were attended. The mean (SD) patient age was 83.9 (7.9) years, and 76.9% were women. Patients with acute toxicity were younger (80.0 [12] years) than those with chronic toxicity (84.1 [7.7] years) (P .038), and accidental poisoning was less common (in 85.2% vs 100% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Cases of acute toxicity were also more serious (Poison Severity Score (29.6% vs 12.5% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Thirty-four patients were treated with digoxin-Fab (5.4%). These patients were younger (78.7 [11.5] years vs 84.2 (7.6) years), their toxicity was more often acute (in 20.6% vs 3.2% in chronic toxicity), more had attempted suicide (8.8% vs 0.2% with chronic toxicity), and more had severe symptoms (50% vs 11.2%) (P .001, all comparisons). Hospital admission was required for 76.1%. Overall, mortality was 11.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic toxicity accounts for most digoxin poisoning cases, and most patients are women. Acute toxicity is more serious. Patients who required digoxin-Fab have more severe poisoning. Such patients usually have acute toxicity, and attempted suicide is more often the reason for the emergency.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 5","pages":"328-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of digoxin toxicity attended in Spanish emergency departments according to type of poisoning and administration of digoxin antibodies: the DIGITOX study.\",\"authors\":\"August Supervía, Andrea Martínez Baladrón, Francisca Córdoba, Francisco Callado, Victoria Lobo Antuña, Jordi Puiguriguer, Elena Fuentes, Valle Molina Samper, Antonio F Caballero-Bermejo, Susana Vert, Francisco Ruíz-Ruíz, F Javier Guijarro Eguinoa, Beatriz Martín-Pérez, Samuel Olmos, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, María Teresa Maza Vera, Oriol Pallàs, Benjamín Climent, Maider Igartua Astibia, Edith Gutiérrez, Santiago Nogué, Ana Ferrer Dufol\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digoxin toxicity accounts for a small percentage of poisonings attended by emergency departments. This study aimed to describe differences between acute and chronic digoxin toxicity and assess the use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (digoxin-Fab) as an antidote.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective, observational, multicenter study in 15 hospital emergency departments in 8 Spanish autonomous communities in 7 years. We collected patient, clinical and treatment variables, and discharge destination. Patients were classified according to whether toxicity was acute or chronic and whether digoxin-Fab was administered or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven acute and 631 chronic digoxin poisonings were attended. The mean (SD) patient age was 83.9 (7.9) years, and 76.9% were women. Patients with acute toxicity were younger (80.0 [12] years) than those with chronic toxicity (84.1 [7.7] years) (P .038), and accidental poisoning was less common (in 85.2% vs 100% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Cases of acute toxicity were also more serious (Poison Severity Score (29.6% vs 12.5% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Thirty-four patients were treated with digoxin-Fab (5.4%). These patients were younger (78.7 [11.5] years vs 84.2 (7.6) years), their toxicity was more often acute (in 20.6% vs 3.2% in chronic toxicity), more had attempted suicide (8.8% vs 0.2% with chronic toxicity), and more had severe symptoms (50% vs 11.2%) (P .001, all comparisons). Hospital admission was required for 76.1%. Overall, mortality was 11.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic toxicity accounts for most digoxin poisoning cases, and most patients are women. Acute toxicity is more serious. Patients who required digoxin-Fab have more severe poisoning. Such patients usually have acute toxicity, and attempted suicide is more often the reason for the emergency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"328-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:地高辛毒性在急诊科就诊的中毒事件中只占很小的比例。本研究旨在描述地高辛急性和慢性毒性之间的差异,并评估地高辛特异性抗体片段(地高辛Fab)作为解药的用途。材料和方法:回顾性、观察性、多中心研究,在7年内对西班牙8个自治社区的15个医院急诊科进行了研究。我们收集了患者、临床和治疗变量以及出院目的地。根据毒性是急性还是慢性以及是否给予地高辛Fab对患者进行分类。结果:治疗了27例急性和631例慢性地高辛中毒。平均(SD)患者年龄为83.9(7.9)岁,76.9%为女性。急性毒性患者(80.0[12]岁)比慢性毒性患者(84.1[7.7]岁)年轻(P.038),意外中毒不太常见(慢性毒性为85.2%比100%;P。001)。急性毒性病例也更严重(毒性严重程度评分(慢性毒性29.6%比12.5%;P。0.001)。34名患者接受地高辛Fab治疗(5.4%)。这些患者更年轻(78.7[11.5]岁比84.2(7.6)岁),它们的毒性更经常是急性的(慢性毒性为20.6%比3.2%),更多的人试图自杀(慢性毒性的8.8%比0.2%),以及更多的人有严重症状(50%比11.2%)(P。001,所有比较)。76.1%的患者需要住院治疗。总的来说,死亡率为11.4%。结论:慢性毒性是地高辛中毒病例的主要原因,大多数患者是女性。急性毒性更为严重。需要地高辛Fab的患者会出现更严重的中毒。这类患者通常具有急性毒性,自杀未遂往往是紧急情况的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of digoxin toxicity attended in Spanish emergency departments according to type of poisoning and administration of digoxin antibodies: the DIGITOX study.

Objectives: Digoxin toxicity accounts for a small percentage of poisonings attended by emergency departments. This study aimed to describe differences between acute and chronic digoxin toxicity and assess the use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (digoxin-Fab) as an antidote.

Material and methods: Retrospective, observational, multicenter study in 15 hospital emergency departments in 8 Spanish autonomous communities in 7 years. We collected patient, clinical and treatment variables, and discharge destination. Patients were classified according to whether toxicity was acute or chronic and whether digoxin-Fab was administered or not.

Results: Twenty-seven acute and 631 chronic digoxin poisonings were attended. The mean (SD) patient age was 83.9 (7.9) years, and 76.9% were women. Patients with acute toxicity were younger (80.0 [12] years) than those with chronic toxicity (84.1 [7.7] years) (P .038), and accidental poisoning was less common (in 85.2% vs 100% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Cases of acute toxicity were also more serious (Poison Severity Score (29.6% vs 12.5% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Thirty-four patients were treated with digoxin-Fab (5.4%). These patients were younger (78.7 [11.5] years vs 84.2 (7.6) years), their toxicity was more often acute (in 20.6% vs 3.2% in chronic toxicity), more had attempted suicide (8.8% vs 0.2% with chronic toxicity), and more had severe symptoms (50% vs 11.2%) (P .001, all comparisons). Hospital admission was required for 76.1%. Overall, mortality was 11.4%.

Conclusion: Chronic toxicity accounts for most digoxin poisoning cases, and most patients are women. Acute toxicity is more serious. Patients who required digoxin-Fab have more severe poisoning. Such patients usually have acute toxicity, and attempted suicide is more often the reason for the emergency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to the Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning Workgroup recommendations for lithium intoxication: the SILITOX study. Artificial-intelligence-based neurological outcome prediction during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes in patients aged 65 years or older living in nursing homes: the Emergency Department and Elder Needs-40 study. Concordance between risk assessment scales for venous thromboembolism in medical patients in the emergency department. Effectiveness and safety of vernakalant vs flecainide for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: the VERITA study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1