使用可见研究影响问卷(VICTOR)来评估护士、助产士和专职卫生专业人员研究金计划的好处。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2023-12-07 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.7748/nr.2023.e1864
Carolyn Spring, Julie Hogg, Judith Holliday, Jo Cooke, Rachel M Taylor
{"title":"使用可见研究影响问卷(VICTOR)来评估护士、助产士和专职卫生专业人员研究金计划的好处。","authors":"Carolyn Spring, Julie Hogg, Judith Holliday, Jo Cooke, Rachel M Taylor","doi":"10.7748/nr.2023.e1864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing emphasis in the UK on developing a nurse, midwife and allied health professional (NMAHP) workforce that conducts research. Training for clinical academic careers is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). However, the low number of successful applicants suggested there were barriers to achieving this. The Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Led Research (CNMR) launched a fellowship programme in 2016 to backfill two days a week of NMAHPs' time for up to a year, to give them time to make competitive applications to the NIHR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report a study evaluating the CNMR fellowship programme.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) tool ( Cooke et al 2019 ) was developed to describe the organisational impact of research. The 2016-17 CNMR fellows completed VICTOR and their responses were analysed using a framework approach. The analysis found the main benefits of participating in the programme were protected time for research, opportunities to develop collaborations, increasing intra- and inter-professional awareness of NMAHPs' research, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. Challenges included a lack of support from line managers, limited value placed on NMAHPs' research and failure to backfill posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were some challenges with the fellowship programme, but all recipients found it to be a positive experience and undertook significant scholarly activity.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>A contractual agreement must be established to foster committed partnerships between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the NHS. HEIs and the NHS should conduct frank discussions of the challenges encountered in fellowship programmes. Positive initiatives and outcomes in tertiary education and clinical settings should be shared to improve fellows' experiences and enhance partnerships between HEIs and the NHS. Job descriptions should include time allocation to review fellowship candidates' applications regardless of outcome. The showcasing of research successes and the benefits of NMAHP research must evolve to secure organisational 'buy in', which is the precursor to widening access to clinical academic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Spring, Julie Hogg, Judith Holliday, Jo Cooke, Rachel M Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/nr.2023.e1864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing emphasis in the UK on developing a nurse, midwife and allied health professional (NMAHP) workforce that conducts research. Training for clinical academic careers is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). However, the low number of successful applicants suggested there were barriers to achieving this. The Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Led Research (CNMR) launched a fellowship programme in 2016 to backfill two days a week of NMAHPs' time for up to a year, to give them time to make competitive applications to the NIHR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report a study evaluating the CNMR fellowship programme.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) tool ( Cooke et al 2019 ) was developed to describe the organisational impact of research. The 2016-17 CNMR fellows completed VICTOR and their responses were analysed using a framework approach. The analysis found the main benefits of participating in the programme were protected time for research, opportunities to develop collaborations, increasing intra- and inter-professional awareness of NMAHPs' research, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. Challenges included a lack of support from line managers, limited value placed on NMAHPs' research and failure to backfill posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were some challenges with the fellowship programme, but all recipients found it to be a positive experience and undertook significant scholarly activity.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>A contractual agreement must be established to foster committed partnerships between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the NHS. HEIs and the NHS should conduct frank discussions of the challenges encountered in fellowship programmes. Positive initiatives and outcomes in tertiary education and clinical settings should be shared to improve fellows' experiences and enhance partnerships between HEIs and the NHS. Job descriptions should include time allocation to review fellowship candidates' applications regardless of outcome. The showcasing of research successes and the benefits of NMAHP research must evolve to secure organisational 'buy in', which is the precursor to widening access to clinical academic pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国越来越重视培养从事研究的护士、助产士和专职卫生专业人员(NMAHP)队伍。临床学术职业培训由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)提供。然而,成功申请的人数很少,这表明实现这一目标存在障碍。护理和助产主导研究中心(CNMR)于2016年启动了一项研究金计划,以填补NMAHP长达一年的每周两天的时间,让他们有时间向NIHR提出竞争性申请。目的:报告一项评估CNMR研究金计划的研究。讨论:开发“使研究的影响可见”(VICTOR)工具(Cooke等人,2019)是为了描述研究的组织影响。2016-17年CNMR研究员完成了VICTOR,并使用框架方法对他们的回答进行了分析。分析发现,参与该计划的主要好处是保护研究时间、发展合作的机会、提高NMAHP研究的内部和专业间意识、同行评审的出版物和会议演示。挑战包括缺乏直线经理的支持,NMAHP的研究价值有限,以及未能填补职位。结论:研究金方案存在一些挑战,但所有接受者都认为这是一次积极的经历,并开展了重要的学术活动。对实践的影响:必须建立合同协议,以促进高等教育机构(HEI)和NHS之间的坚定伙伴关系。高等教育机构和国家医疗服务体系应就研究金计划中遇到的挑战进行坦率的讨论。应分享高等教育和临床环境中的积极举措和成果,以改善研究员的经验,并加强高等教育机构和NHS之间的伙伴关系。职位描述应包括审查研究金候选人申请的时间分配,无论结果如何。展示研究成功和NMAHP研究的好处必须不断发展,以确保组织的“认可”,这是扩大临床学术途径的前兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) questionnaire to evaluate the benefits of a fellowship programme for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.

Background: There is increasing emphasis in the UK on developing a nurse, midwife and allied health professional (NMAHP) workforce that conducts research. Training for clinical academic careers is provided by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). However, the low number of successful applicants suggested there were barriers to achieving this. The Centre for Nursing and Midwifery Led Research (CNMR) launched a fellowship programme in 2016 to backfill two days a week of NMAHPs' time for up to a year, to give them time to make competitive applications to the NIHR.

Aim: To report a study evaluating the CNMR fellowship programme.

Discussion: The making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research (VICTOR) tool ( Cooke et al 2019 ) was developed to describe the organisational impact of research. The 2016-17 CNMR fellows completed VICTOR and their responses were analysed using a framework approach. The analysis found the main benefits of participating in the programme were protected time for research, opportunities to develop collaborations, increasing intra- and inter-professional awareness of NMAHPs' research, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations. Challenges included a lack of support from line managers, limited value placed on NMAHPs' research and failure to backfill posts.

Conclusion: There were some challenges with the fellowship programme, but all recipients found it to be a positive experience and undertook significant scholarly activity.

Implications for practice: A contractual agreement must be established to foster committed partnerships between higher education institutions (HEIs) and the NHS. HEIs and the NHS should conduct frank discussions of the challenges encountered in fellowship programmes. Positive initiatives and outcomes in tertiary education and clinical settings should be shared to improve fellows' experiences and enhance partnerships between HEIs and the NHS. Job descriptions should include time allocation to review fellowship candidates' applications regardless of outcome. The showcasing of research successes and the benefits of NMAHP research must evolve to secure organisational 'buy in', which is the precursor to widening access to clinical academic pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. The methodological challenges faced when conducting hydration research in UK care homes. Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services. A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies. A worked example of contextualising and using reflexive thematic analysis in nursing research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1