Julius Burkauska, Luca Pellegrini, Kristina Mozuraityte, Julija Gecaite-Stonciene, Dorottya Hidvégi, Zsolt Demetrovics, Naomi A Fineberg
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间有问题的互联网使用:流行率数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Julius Burkauska, Luca Pellegrini, Kristina Mozuraityte, Julija Gecaite-Stonciene, Dorottya Hidvégi, Zsolt Demetrovics, Naomi A Fineberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study sought to synthesize prevalence rates of problematic internet use (PIU) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general adult (age over 18 years old) population and to investigate its possible moderators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preregistered systematic literature review using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost/PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, GSK Clinical Study Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted. Research was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 publications were identified, fulfilling inclusion criteria from a total of 595 studies. The analysis revealed that the prevalence of PIU during the COVID-19 pandemic period was 25%, however applying a stringent threshold for the PIU, resulted in a much lower prevalence of 7.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PIU prevalence rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population was 7.9%. Measuring the prevalence of PIU remains complicated due to the large methodological and cultural diversity that exists, so global prevalence estimates of PIU vary substantially. More methodologically sound research on psychodiagnostic assessment and cultural variances is required. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2023; 25(3): 131-141) Keywords: COVID-19; internet addiction; problematic usage of the internet; prevalence; systematic review, meta-analysis Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021284619.</p>","PeriodicalId":39762,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","volume":"25 3","pages":"131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data.\",\"authors\":\"Julius Burkauska, Luca Pellegrini, Kristina Mozuraityte, Julija Gecaite-Stonciene, Dorottya Hidvégi, Zsolt Demetrovics, Naomi A Fineberg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study sought to synthesize prevalence rates of problematic internet use (PIU) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general adult (age over 18 years old) population and to investigate its possible moderators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preregistered systematic literature review using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost/PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, GSK Clinical Study Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted. Research was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 publications were identified, fulfilling inclusion criteria from a total of 595 studies. The analysis revealed that the prevalence of PIU during the COVID-19 pandemic period was 25%, however applying a stringent threshold for the PIU, resulted in a much lower prevalence of 7.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PIU prevalence rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population was 7.9%. Measuring the prevalence of PIU remains complicated due to the large methodological and cultural diversity that exists, so global prevalence estimates of PIU vary substantially. More methodologically sound research on psychodiagnostic assessment and cultural variances is required. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2023; 25(3): 131-141) Keywords: COVID-19; internet addiction; problematic usage of the internet; prevalence; systematic review, meta-analysis Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021284619.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"131-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究试图综合新冠肺炎大流行期间普通成年(18岁以上)人群中问题互联网使用(PIU)的流行率,并调查其可能的调节因素。方法:使用PubMed/MEDLINE、EBSCOhost/PsyINFO、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、GSK Clinical Study Register和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库进行预先注册的系统文献综述。研究是根据2015年系统审查和荟萃分析方案首选报告项目清单完成的。结果:共确定了22篇出版物,符合595项研究的纳入标准。分析显示,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,PIU的流行率为25%,但对PIU应用严格的阈值,结论:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,普通人群的PIU患病率为7.9%。由于存在巨大的方法和文化多样性,测量PIU的患病率仍然很复杂,因此全球PIU的发病率估计值差异很大。需要对心理诊断评估和文化差异进行更多方法论上合理的研究。(神经精神药物Hung 2023;25(3):131-141)关键词:新冠肺炎;网络成瘾;互联网使用问题;流行系统综述,荟萃分析系统综述注册:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42021284619。
Problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence data.
Aims: This study sought to synthesize prevalence rates of problematic internet use (PIU) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general adult (age over 18 years old) population and to investigate its possible moderators.
Methods: A preregistered systematic literature review using the PubMed/MEDLINE, EBSCOhost/PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, GSK Clinical Study Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted. Research was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist.
Results: A total of 22 publications were identified, fulfilling inclusion criteria from a total of 595 studies. The analysis revealed that the prevalence of PIU during the COVID-19 pandemic period was 25%, however applying a stringent threshold for the PIU, resulted in a much lower prevalence of 7.9%.
Conclusion: The PIU prevalence rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population was 7.9%. Measuring the prevalence of PIU remains complicated due to the large methodological and cultural diversity that exists, so global prevalence estimates of PIU vary substantially. More methodologically sound research on psychodiagnostic assessment and cultural variances is required. (Neuropsychopharmacol Hung 2023; 25(3): 131-141) Keywords: COVID-19; internet addiction; problematic usage of the internet; prevalence; systematic review, meta-analysis Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021284619.