黑人和白人肥胖程度差异的地理差异。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-26 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.679
Steven A Cohen, Monique J Brown, Furong Xu, Caitlin C Nash, Mary L Greaney
{"title":"黑人和白人肥胖程度差异的地理差异。","authors":"Steven A Cohen, Monique J Brown, Furong Xu, Caitlin C Nash, Mary L Greaney","doi":"10.1002/osp4.679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity disparities in the United States are well documented, but the limited body of research suggests that geographic factors may alter the magnitude of these disparities. A growing body of evidence has identified a \"rural mortality penalty\" where morbidity and mortality rates are higher in rural than urban areas, even after controlling for other factors. Black-White differences in health and mortality are more pronounced in rural areas than in urban areas.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore how rural-urban status and region moderate Black-White health disparities in obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were abstracted from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, with the sample being restricted to Black and White respondents (n = 403,231). Respondents' county of residence was linked to US Census information to obtain the county-level Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) and Census division. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were utilized to assess the magnitude of Black-White disparities in having obesity (yes/no) by IRR quartile and by Census division.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, Black-White differences in obesity were wider in rural than in urban counties, with a significant linear trend (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when stratified by US Census division, results revealed that disparities were significantly wider in rural than urban areas for respondents living in the Middle Atlantic and South Atlantic divisions. In contrast, the association was reversed for the remaining divisions (New England, East North Central, West North Central, Mountain, and Pacific), where the magnitude of the Black-White difference was the largest in urban areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the need to understand and account for critical place-based factors that exacerbate racial obesity disparities to develop and maximize the effectiveness of policies and programs designed to reduce racial inequalities and improve population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"9 5","pages":"516-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic differences in the magnitude of black-white disparities in having obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Steven A Cohen, Monique J Brown, Furong Xu, Caitlin C Nash, Mary L Greaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity disparities in the United States are well documented, but the limited body of research suggests that geographic factors may alter the magnitude of these disparities. A growing body of evidence has identified a \\\"rural mortality penalty\\\" where morbidity and mortality rates are higher in rural than urban areas, even after controlling for other factors. Black-White differences in health and mortality are more pronounced in rural areas than in urban areas.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore how rural-urban status and region moderate Black-White health disparities in obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were abstracted from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, with the sample being restricted to Black and White respondents (n = 403,231). Respondents' county of residence was linked to US Census information to obtain the county-level Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) and Census division. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were utilized to assess the magnitude of Black-White disparities in having obesity (yes/no) by IRR quartile and by Census division.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, Black-White differences in obesity were wider in rural than in urban counties, with a significant linear trend (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when stratified by US Census division, results revealed that disparities were significantly wider in rural than urban areas for respondents living in the Middle Atlantic and South Atlantic divisions. In contrast, the association was reversed for the remaining divisions (New England, East North Central, West North Central, Mountain, and Pacific), where the magnitude of the Black-White difference was the largest in urban areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the need to understand and account for critical place-based factors that exacerbate racial obesity disparities to develop and maximize the effectiveness of policies and programs designed to reduce racial inequalities and improve population health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"516-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国的肥胖差异有充分的记录,但有限的研究表明,地理因素可能会改变这些差异的程度。越来越多的证据表明,即使在控制了其他因素后,农村地区的发病率和死亡率也高于城市地区的“农村死亡率”。黑人和白人在健康和死亡率方面的差异在农村地区比在城市地区更为明显。目的:因此,本研究的目的是探讨城乡地位和地区如何调节黑人和白人在肥胖方面的健康差异。方法:数据取自2012年行为风险因素监测系统,样本仅限于黑人和白人受访者(n=403231)。受访者的居住县与美国人口普查信息相关联,以获得相对道德县级指数(IRR)和人口普查划分。使用粗略和调整后的逻辑回归模型,通过IRR四分位数和人口普查划分来评估黑人和白人在肥胖方面的差异程度(是/否)。结果:总体而言,黑人和白人在农村地区的肥胖差异比城市县更大,具有显著的线性趋势(p<0.001)。此外,根据美国人口普查部门进行分层时,结果显示,对于生活在中大西洋和南大西洋地区的受访者来说,农村地区的差异比城市地区大得多。相比之下,其余分区(新英格兰、中北部东部、中北部西部、山区和太平洋)的关联性发生了逆转,这些分区的黑白差异在城市地区最大。结论:研究结果强调,需要了解和解释加剧种族肥胖差距的关键地方因素,以制定和最大限度地提高旨在减少种族不平等和改善人口健康的政策和计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographic differences in the magnitude of black-white disparities in having obesity.

Background: Obesity disparities in the United States are well documented, but the limited body of research suggests that geographic factors may alter the magnitude of these disparities. A growing body of evidence has identified a "rural mortality penalty" where morbidity and mortality rates are higher in rural than urban areas, even after controlling for other factors. Black-White differences in health and mortality are more pronounced in rural areas than in urban areas.

Objective: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore how rural-urban status and region moderate Black-White health disparities in obesity.

Methods: Data were abstracted from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, with the sample being restricted to Black and White respondents (n = 403,231). Respondents' county of residence was linked to US Census information to obtain the county-level Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) and Census division. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were utilized to assess the magnitude of Black-White disparities in having obesity (yes/no) by IRR quartile and by Census division.

Results: Overall, Black-White differences in obesity were wider in rural than in urban counties, with a significant linear trend (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when stratified by US Census division, results revealed that disparities were significantly wider in rural than urban areas for respondents living in the Middle Atlantic and South Atlantic divisions. In contrast, the association was reversed for the remaining divisions (New England, East North Central, West North Central, Mountain, and Pacific), where the magnitude of the Black-White difference was the largest in urban areas.

Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to understand and account for critical place-based factors that exacerbate racial obesity disparities to develop and maximize the effectiveness of policies and programs designed to reduce racial inequalities and improve population health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1