信仰使它成为科学:信不信由你。

IF 5.1 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Function (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2023-09-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/function/zqad049
Rüdiger J Seitz, Raymond F Paloutzian
{"title":"信仰使它成为科学:信不信由你。","authors":"Rüdiger J Seitz, Raymond F Paloutzian","doi":"10.1093/function/zqad049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© t n c long-standing discourse in philosophy dating back to antiqity concerns the nature of beliefs and believing. Until today, he notion “belief” has been of importance in philosophy, as evient from the definition of knowledge as justified true belief. In act, the notion “belief” was understood as a topic of resear c h ocused on people’s attitudes or opinions about what was or was ot true in the w orld. 1 Resear c h questions were summarized by he formula “ S A that P ,” where S denotes the mental state, A he attitude of a putati v el y rational a gent, and P the v erball y xpr essed pr oposition r eflecting the belief. 1 By contrast, the tudy of beliefs was generally assumed to be incompatible with he natural sciences. Ver y r ecentl y, howev er, the term “belief” as been described as to be used widespread in the cogniti v e cience literature to explain human reasoning and behavior. 2 pecifically, it has been described that beliefs act as fundamenal hypotheses about the world that result from any amount of ogniti v e pr ocessing and ar e held with any degr ee of certainty. 3 hus, beliefs are apparently not propositions expressed by conciousl y aw ar e , so-called r ational agents, but, on the contrary, eterminants of people’s spontaneous and intuiti v e behavior in complex world, as highlighted in a recent interdisciplinary esear c h topic. 4 Here , w e put the implications of the recent dvancements in this rapidly evolving field in perspective for the ciences and beyond.","PeriodicalId":73119,"journal":{"name":"Function (Oxford, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/e5/zqad049.PMC10519273.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs Made It into Science: Believe It or Not.\",\"authors\":\"Rüdiger J Seitz, Raymond F Paloutzian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/function/zqad049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"© t n c long-standing discourse in philosophy dating back to antiqity concerns the nature of beliefs and believing. Until today, he notion “belief” has been of importance in philosophy, as evient from the definition of knowledge as justified true belief. In act, the notion “belief” was understood as a topic of resear c h ocused on people’s attitudes or opinions about what was or was ot true in the w orld. 1 Resear c h questions were summarized by he formula “ S A that P ,” where S denotes the mental state, A he attitude of a putati v el y rational a gent, and P the v erball y xpr essed pr oposition r eflecting the belief. 1 By contrast, the tudy of beliefs was generally assumed to be incompatible with he natural sciences. Ver y r ecentl y, howev er, the term “belief” as been described as to be used widespread in the cogniti v e cience literature to explain human reasoning and behavior. 2 pecifically, it has been described that beliefs act as fundamenal hypotheses about the world that result from any amount of ogniti v e pr ocessing and ar e held with any degr ee of certainty. 3 hus, beliefs are apparently not propositions expressed by conciousl y aw ar e , so-called r ational agents, but, on the contrary, eterminants of people’s spontaneous and intuiti v e behavior in complex world, as highlighted in a recent interdisciplinary esear c h topic. 4 Here , w e put the implications of the recent dvancements in this rapidly evolving field in perspective for the ciences and beyond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Function (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/e5/zqad049.PMC10519273.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Function (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/function/zqad049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/function/zqad049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beliefs Made It into Science: Believe It or Not.
© t n c long-standing discourse in philosophy dating back to antiqity concerns the nature of beliefs and believing. Until today, he notion “belief” has been of importance in philosophy, as evient from the definition of knowledge as justified true belief. In act, the notion “belief” was understood as a topic of resear c h ocused on people’s attitudes or opinions about what was or was ot true in the w orld. 1 Resear c h questions were summarized by he formula “ S A that P ,” where S denotes the mental state, A he attitude of a putati v el y rational a gent, and P the v erball y xpr essed pr oposition r eflecting the belief. 1 By contrast, the tudy of beliefs was generally assumed to be incompatible with he natural sciences. Ver y r ecentl y, howev er, the term “belief” as been described as to be used widespread in the cogniti v e cience literature to explain human reasoning and behavior. 2 pecifically, it has been described that beliefs act as fundamenal hypotheses about the world that result from any amount of ogniti v e pr ocessing and ar e held with any degr ee of certainty. 3 hus, beliefs are apparently not propositions expressed by conciousl y aw ar e , so-called r ational agents, but, on the contrary, eterminants of people’s spontaneous and intuiti v e behavior in complex world, as highlighted in a recent interdisciplinary esear c h topic. 4 Here , w e put the implications of the recent dvancements in this rapidly evolving field in perspective for the ciences and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Circadian Changes in Muscle Physiology: Methodological Considerations. Malaria and Hypertension: What Is the Direction of Association? Impaired neurocirculatory control in chronic kidney disease: New evidence for blunted sympathetic baroreflex and reduced sympathetic transduction. Intrinsic Skeletal Muscle Function and Contraction-stimulated Glucose Uptake Do Not Vary by Time-of-day in Mice. Managing SABV in Physiological Research: Best Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1