使用神经预测量表和儿童神经肿瘤治疗强度评分预测儿童脑瘤幸存者的神经心理晚期影响。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1017/S1355617723000589
Alannah R Srsich, Mark D McCurdy, Peter M Fantozzi, Matthew C Hocking
{"title":"使用神经预测量表和儿童神经肿瘤治疗强度评分预测儿童脑瘤幸存者的神经心理晚期影响。","authors":"Alannah R Srsich, Mark D McCurdy, Peter M Fantozzi, Matthew C Hocking","doi":"10.1017/S1355617723000589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) quantifies cumulative exposure to tumor- and treatment-related neurological risks. The Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) measures the intensity of different treatment modalities, but research is needed to establish whether it is associated with late effects. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the NPS and PNORTI for neuropsychological outcomes in pediatric brain tumor survivors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective chart review was completed of pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) (<i>n</i> = 161, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 13.47, <i>SD</i> = 2.80) who were at least 2 years from the end of tumor-directed treatment. Attention, intellectual functioning, perceptual reasoning, processing speed, verbal reasoning, and working memory were analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS scores ranged from 1 to 11 (<i>M</i> = 5.57, <i>SD</i> = 2.27) and PNORTI scores ranged from 1 (<i>n</i> = 101; 62.7%) to 3 (<i>n</i> = 18; 11.2%). When controlling for age, sex, SES factors, and time since treatment, NPS scores significantly predicted intellectual functioning [<i>F</i>(7,149) = 12.86, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .38] and processing speed [<i>F</i>(7,84) = 5.28, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .31]. PNORTI scores did not significantly predict neuropsychological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that the NPS has value in predicting IF and processing speed above-and-beyond demographic variables. The PNORTI was not associated with neuropsychological outcomes. Future research should consider establishing clinical cutoff scores for the NPS to help determine which survivors are most at risk for neuropsychological late effects and warrant additional assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting neuropsychological late effects in pediatric brain tumor survivors using the Neurological Predictor Scale and the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity.\",\"authors\":\"Alannah R Srsich, Mark D McCurdy, Peter M Fantozzi, Matthew C Hocking\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617723000589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) quantifies cumulative exposure to tumor- and treatment-related neurological risks. The Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) measures the intensity of different treatment modalities, but research is needed to establish whether it is associated with late effects. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the NPS and PNORTI for neuropsychological outcomes in pediatric brain tumor survivors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective chart review was completed of pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) (<i>n</i> = 161, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 13.47, <i>SD</i> = 2.80) who were at least 2 years from the end of tumor-directed treatment. Attention, intellectual functioning, perceptual reasoning, processing speed, verbal reasoning, and working memory were analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS scores ranged from 1 to 11 (<i>M</i> = 5.57, <i>SD</i> = 2.27) and PNORTI scores ranged from 1 (<i>n</i> = 101; 62.7%) to 3 (<i>n</i> = 18; 11.2%). When controlling for age, sex, SES factors, and time since treatment, NPS scores significantly predicted intellectual functioning [<i>F</i>(7,149) = 12.86, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .38] and processing speed [<i>F</i>(7,84) = 5.28, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .31]. PNORTI scores did not significantly predict neuropsychological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that the NPS has value in predicting IF and processing speed above-and-beyond demographic variables. The PNORTI was not associated with neuropsychological outcomes. Future research should consider establishing clinical cutoff scores for the NPS to help determine which survivors are most at risk for neuropsychological late effects and warrant additional assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617723000589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:神经预测量表(NPS)量化肿瘤和治疗相关神经风险的累积暴露。儿科神经肿瘤学治疗强度评分(PNORTI)衡量不同治疗方式的强度,但需要进行研究来确定它是否与晚期疗效有关。本研究评估了NPS和PNORTI对儿童脑肿瘤幸存者神经心理结果的预测有效性。方法:对距离肿瘤定向治疗结束至少2年的儿童脑肿瘤幸存者(PBTS)(n=161,Mage=13.47,SD=2.80)进行回顾性图表审查。分析了注意力、智力功能、知觉推理、处理速度、言语推理和工作记忆与NPS和PNORTI的关系。结果:NPS评分范围为1-11(M=5.57,SD=2.27),PNORTI评分范围为1(n=101;62.7%)-3(n=18;11.2%),NPS评分可显著预测智力功能[F(7149)=12.86,p<.001,R2=.38]和处理速度[F(7,84)=5.28,p<0.001,R2=0.31]。PNORTI评分不能显著预测神经心理结果。结论:研究结果表明,NPS在预测IF和处理速度方面具有超越人口统计学变量的价值。PNORTI与神经心理学结果无关。未来的研究应该考虑建立NPS的临床临界分数,以帮助确定哪些幸存者最有可能受到神经心理晚期影响,并需要进行额外的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting neuropsychological late effects in pediatric brain tumor survivors using the Neurological Predictor Scale and the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity.

Objective: The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) quantifies cumulative exposure to tumor- and treatment-related neurological risks. The Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) measures the intensity of different treatment modalities, but research is needed to establish whether it is associated with late effects. This study evaluated the predictive validity of the NPS and PNORTI for neuropsychological outcomes in pediatric brain tumor survivors.

Method: A retrospective chart review was completed of pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) (n = 161, Mage = 13.47, SD = 2.80) who were at least 2 years from the end of tumor-directed treatment. Attention, intellectual functioning, perceptual reasoning, processing speed, verbal reasoning, and working memory were analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI.

Results: NPS scores ranged from 1 to 11 (M = 5.57, SD = 2.27) and PNORTI scores ranged from 1 (n = 101; 62.7%) to 3 (n = 18; 11.2%). When controlling for age, sex, SES factors, and time since treatment, NPS scores significantly predicted intellectual functioning [F(7,149) = 12.86, p < .001, R2 = .38] and processing speed [F(7,84) = 5.28, p < .001, R2 = .31]. PNORTI scores did not significantly predict neuropsychological outcomes.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that the NPS has value in predicting IF and processing speed above-and-beyond demographic variables. The PNORTI was not associated with neuropsychological outcomes. Future research should consider establishing clinical cutoff scores for the NPS to help determine which survivors are most at risk for neuropsychological late effects and warrant additional assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The Grenada Learning and Memory Scale: Psychometric features and normative data in Caribbean preschool children. Beyond brain injury: Examining the neuropsychological and psychosocial sequelae of post-traumatic epilepsy. Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults. Comparing and linking the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1