[外科切除方法检测前列腺癌症前列腺外延伸和阳性切除边缘的效率比较]。

Q4 Medicine Arkhiv patologii Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17116/patol20238505148

F V Novikov, O S Tesljuk, G D Efremov

{"title":"[外科切除方法检测前列腺癌症前列腺外延伸和阳性切除边缘的效率比较]。","authors":"F V Novikov, O S Tesljuk, G D Efremov","doi":"10.17116/patol20238505148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the samples of 26 prostatectomies, the method of excision of the prostate gland according to Kim was tested. This method increased the number of blocks by 30.2% and increased the detectability of extraprostatic extension by 41.7% and positive surgical margin by 40.0% compared to the method of alternate prostate sections. Also, the method according to Kim reduced the number of blocks of prostate tissue by 34.3% compared to the method of complete prostate excision.","PeriodicalId":8548,"journal":{"name":"Arkhiv patologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of the efficiency of surgical excision methods for detecting extraprostatic extension and positive resection margin in prostate cancer].\",\"authors\":\"F V Novikov, O S Tesljuk, G D Efremov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/patol20238505148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the samples of 26 prostatectomies, the method of excision of the prostate gland according to Kim was tested. This method increased the number of blocks by 30.2% and increased the detectability of extraprostatic extension by 41.7% and positive surgical margin by 40.0% compared to the method of alternate prostate sections. Also, the method according to Kim reduced the number of blocks of prostate tissue by 34.3% compared to the method of complete prostate excision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arkhiv patologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arkhiv patologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20238505148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arkhiv patologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20238505148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在26例前列腺切除术的样本上，测试了Kim提出的前列腺切除方法。与交替前列腺切片的方法相比，该方法将阻断次数增加了30.2%，将前列腺外延伸的可检测性增加了41.7%，将阳性手术切缘增加了40.0%。此外，根据Kim的方法与完全前列腺切除的方法相比，前列腺组织块的数量减少了34.3%。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

[Comparison of the efficiency of surgical excision methods for detecting extraprostatic extension and positive resection margin in prostate cancer].

On the samples of 26 prostatectomies, the method of excision of the prostate gland according to Kim was tested. This method increased the number of blocks by 30.2% and increased the detectability of extraprostatic extension by 41.7% and positive surgical margin by 40.0% compared to the method of alternate prostate sections. Also, the method according to Kim reduced the number of blocks of prostate tissue by 34.3% compared to the method of complete prostate excision.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arkhiv patologii Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal deals with original investigations on pressing problems of general pathology and pathologic anatomy, newest research methods, major issues of the theory and practice as well as problems of experimental, comparative and geographic pathology. To inform readers latest achievements of Russian and foreign medicine the journal regularly publishes editorial and survey articles, reviews of the most interesting Russian and foreign books on pathologic anatomy, new data on modern methods of investigation (histochemistry, electron microscopy, autoradiography, etc.), about problems of teaching, articles on the history of pathological anatomy development both in Russia and abroad.