{"title":"中风对土耳其安卡拉接受康复治疗和生活的人的影响。","authors":"Orkun Tahir Aran, Barkın Köse, Gunilla Erikson, Susanne Guidetti","doi":"10.1177/22799036231204321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and practices vary between high and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Knowledge of the perceived impact of stroke in Turkey is limited. Understanding these perceptions can serve as a basis for developing rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The aim was to investigate and compare the perceived impact of stroke in two groups of people living in Ankara. A cross-sectional study with 150 participants divided by stroke onset (Group I: stroke onset <12 months; Group II: >12 months) was conducted. The Barthel Index was used to describe the level of independence in daily living activities and stroke severity. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was used to investigate the perceived impact of stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of mild strokes was 78 and 82%, respectively, and 46% of participants in the total sample were moderately dependent. The impact of stroke was high; mean domain scores were below 50 in six of the eight SIS domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Turkish stroke survivors perceived a higher impact of stroke regardless of the time passed since stroke onset, compared to survivors from other countries, including other LMICs. The high impact among survivors with mostly mild stroke indicates that Turkish survivors might not receive adequate rehabilitation. The content of rehabilitation services needs to be developed, and an evaluation of individually tailored interventions, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach, is warranted to find ways to decrease the perceived impact of stroke among Turkish stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"22799036231204321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of stroke on people that receive rehabilitation and are living in Ankara, Turkey.\",\"authors\":\"Orkun Tahir Aran, Barkın Köse, Gunilla Erikson, Susanne Guidetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036231204321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and practices vary between high and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Knowledge of the perceived impact of stroke in Turkey is limited. Understanding these perceptions can serve as a basis for developing rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The aim was to investigate and compare the perceived impact of stroke in two groups of people living in Ankara. A cross-sectional study with 150 participants divided by stroke onset (Group I: stroke onset <12 months; Group II: >12 months) was conducted. The Barthel Index was used to describe the level of independence in daily living activities and stroke severity. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was used to investigate the perceived impact of stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of mild strokes was 78 and 82%, respectively, and 46% of participants in the total sample were moderately dependent. The impact of stroke was high; mean domain scores were below 50 in six of the eight SIS domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Turkish stroke survivors perceived a higher impact of stroke regardless of the time passed since stroke onset, compared to survivors from other countries, including other LMICs. The high impact among survivors with mostly mild stroke indicates that Turkish survivors might not receive adequate rehabilitation. The content of rehabilitation services needs to be developed, and an evaluation of individually tailored interventions, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach, is warranted to find ways to decrease the perceived impact of stroke among Turkish stroke survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"22799036231204321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231204321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231204321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of stroke on people that receive rehabilitation and are living in Ankara, Turkey.
Background: Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and practices vary between high and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Knowledge of the perceived impact of stroke in Turkey is limited. Understanding these perceptions can serve as a basis for developing rehabilitation.
Design and methods: The aim was to investigate and compare the perceived impact of stroke in two groups of people living in Ankara. A cross-sectional study with 150 participants divided by stroke onset (Group I: stroke onset <12 months; Group II: >12 months) was conducted. The Barthel Index was used to describe the level of independence in daily living activities and stroke severity. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0) was used to investigate the perceived impact of stroke.
Results: The proportion of mild strokes was 78 and 82%, respectively, and 46% of participants in the total sample were moderately dependent. The impact of stroke was high; mean domain scores were below 50 in six of the eight SIS domains.
Conclusions: Turkish stroke survivors perceived a higher impact of stroke regardless of the time passed since stroke onset, compared to survivors from other countries, including other LMICs. The high impact among survivors with mostly mild stroke indicates that Turkish survivors might not receive adequate rehabilitation. The content of rehabilitation services needs to be developed, and an evaluation of individually tailored interventions, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach, is warranted to find ways to decrease the perceived impact of stroke among Turkish stroke survivors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.