硬膜外浸润治疗急性和亚急性腰骶神经根病引起的疼痛和残疾的疗效。

Jose Manuel Rabanal Llevot , Amaia Muñoz Alonso , Alberto Taborga Echevarría , Jose Angel Martínez Agueros , Sergio Maldonado Vega
{"title":"硬膜外浸润治疗急性和亚急性腰骶神经根病引起的疼痛和残疾的疗效。","authors":"Jose Manuel Rabanal Llevot ,&nbsp;Amaia Muñoz Alonso ,&nbsp;Alberto Taborga Echevarría ,&nbsp;Jose Angel Martínez Agueros ,&nbsp;Sergio Maldonado Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p><span>Epidural infiltrations<span> are used for treatment<span> of low back pain and sciatica. Linked to lumbar </span></span></span>radiculopathy (lumbosacral radicular syndrome). This study evaluates the efficacy of epidural infiltration by different routes to reduce pain intensity, disability and return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Is a prospective observational study in one hundred consecutive patients sent to pain unit for severe lumbo-sacral radiculopaty. We analyze the efficacy on pain relief (Visual Analogue Scale) and funcional status at two weeks, one month, and three months after epidural injection of local anesthetics and esteroids with differents approachs (interlaminar, caudal and transforaminal).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety nine patients (46.5% men, 53.5 women) were finally enrrolled in the study. Mean age was 57.47 ± 11.1 years. The caudal approach was used in 58.6% patients, 23.2% transforaminal approach, and 18.2% interlaminar approach. A significant pain relief was found in all times studied (EAV 7.48 ± 1.5 basal; 6.2 ± 0,9 at 15 days; 6.3 ± 1.2 at one month; 6.15 ± 1.3 at 3 months, p &lt; 0.05). Transforaminal approach was superior to caudal or interlaminal. Seventy percent in time off work patients returned to work after epidural inyections.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Epidural local anesthetics with esteroids injections for lumbo-sacral radiculopathy were effective for low back pain, improved functional status and promoted return to work. Transforaminal approach is superior to others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 64-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of epidural infiltration in the management of pain and disability due to acute and subacute lumbosacral radiculopathy\",\"authors\":\"Jose Manuel Rabanal Llevot ,&nbsp;Amaia Muñoz Alonso ,&nbsp;Alberto Taborga Echevarría ,&nbsp;Jose Angel Martínez Agueros ,&nbsp;Sergio Maldonado Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><p><span>Epidural infiltrations<span> are used for treatment<span> of low back pain and sciatica. Linked to lumbar </span></span></span>radiculopathy (lumbosacral radicular syndrome). This study evaluates the efficacy of epidural infiltration by different routes to reduce pain intensity, disability and return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Is a prospective observational study in one hundred consecutive patients sent to pain unit for severe lumbo-sacral radiculopaty. We analyze the efficacy on pain relief (Visual Analogue Scale) and funcional status at two weeks, one month, and three months after epidural injection of local anesthetics and esteroids with differents approachs (interlaminar, caudal and transforaminal).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety nine patients (46.5% men, 53.5 women) were finally enrrolled in the study. Mean age was 57.47 ± 11.1 years. The caudal approach was used in 58.6% patients, 23.2% transforaminal approach, and 18.2% interlaminar approach. A significant pain relief was found in all times studied (EAV 7.48 ± 1.5 basal; 6.2 ± 0,9 at 15 days; 6.3 ± 1.2 at one month; 6.15 ± 1.3 at 3 months, p &lt; 0.05). Transforaminal approach was superior to caudal or interlaminal. Seventy percent in time off work patients returned to work after epidural inyections.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Epidural local anesthetics with esteroids injections for lumbo-sacral radiculopathy were effective for low back pain, improved functional status and promoted return to work. Transforaminal approach is superior to others.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 64-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849623000394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849623000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:硬膜外浸润用于治疗腰痛和坐骨神经痛。与腰神经根病(腰骶神经根综合征)有关。本研究评估了不同途径硬膜外浸润对减轻疼痛强度、致残和重返工作岗位的疗效。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,对连续100名因严重腰骶神经根痛而被送往疼痛病房的患者进行研究。我们分析了硬膜外注射局麻药和酯类药物后两周、一个月和三个月的镇痛效果(视觉模拟量表)和功能状态。平均年龄为57.47岁 ± 11.1年。58.6%的患者采用尾侧入路,23.2%采用经孔入路,18.2%采用层间入路。在所研究的所有时间内都发现了显著的疼痛缓解(EAV 7.48 ± 1.5基底;6.2 ± 第15天为0.9;6.3 ± 1.2一个月;6.15 ± 1.3在3 月,p 结论:硬膜外局麻药联合注射酯类药物治疗腰骶神经根病可有效治疗腰痛,改善功能状态,促进重返工作岗位。经口入路优于其他入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of epidural infiltration in the management of pain and disability due to acute and subacute lumbosacral radiculopathy

Background and Objective

Epidural infiltrations are used for treatment of low back pain and sciatica. Linked to lumbar radiculopathy (lumbosacral radicular syndrome). This study evaluates the efficacy of epidural infiltration by different routes to reduce pain intensity, disability and return to work.

Methods

Is a prospective observational study in one hundred consecutive patients sent to pain unit for severe lumbo-sacral radiculopaty. We analyze the efficacy on pain relief (Visual Analogue Scale) and funcional status at two weeks, one month, and three months after epidural injection of local anesthetics and esteroids with differents approachs (interlaminar, caudal and transforaminal).

Results

Ninety nine patients (46.5% men, 53.5 women) were finally enrrolled in the study. Mean age was 57.47 ± 11.1 years. The caudal approach was used in 58.6% patients, 23.2% transforaminal approach, and 18.2% interlaminar approach. A significant pain relief was found in all times studied (EAV 7.48 ± 1.5 basal; 6.2 ± 0,9 at 15 days; 6.3 ± 1.2 at one month; 6.15 ± 1.3 at 3 months, p < 0.05). Transforaminal approach was superior to caudal or interlaminal. Seventy percent in time off work patients returned to work after epidural inyections.

Conclusions

Epidural local anesthetics with esteroids injections for lumbo-sacral radiculopathy were effective for low back pain, improved functional status and promoted return to work. Transforaminal approach is superior to others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hemifacial spasm associated with trigeminal neuralgia secondary to trigeminal vascular compression Proposal for a complementary safety checklist for spine surgery Endovascular treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in a dual-trained neurosurgical unit: Results and proposal of a randomized controlled trial protocol Relationship between optic nerve length and interoptic angle in the prediction of optic chiasm location Electromagnetic neuronavigation in neuroendoscopy. Navigation proposal for the LOTTA ventriculoscope. Technical note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1