科学共享资源的刚性和可复制性调查。

Kevin L Knudtson, Robert H Carnahan, Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies, Nancy C Fisher, Belynda Hicks, Peter A Lopez, Susan M Meyn, Sheenah M Mische, Frances Weis-Garcia, Lisa D White, Katia Sol-Church
{"title":"科学共享资源的刚性和可复制性调查。","authors":"Kevin L Knudtson, Robert H Carnahan, Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies, Nancy C Fisher, Belynda Hicks, Peter A Lopez, Susan M Meyn, Sheenah M Mische, Frances Weis-Garcia, Lisa D White, Katia Sol-Church","doi":"10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared scientific resources, also known as core facilities, support a significant portion of the research conducted at biomolecular research institutions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) established the Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CCoRRe) to further its mission of integrating advanced technologies, education, and communication in the operations of shared scientific resources in support of reproducible research. In order to first assess the needs of the scientific shared resource community, the CCoRRe solicited feedback from ABRF members <i>via</i> a survey. The purpose of the survey was to gain information on how U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives on advancing scientific rigor and reproducibility influenced current services and new technology development. In addition, the survey aimed to identify the challenges and opportunities related to implementation of new reporting requirements and to identify new practices and resources needed to ensure rigorous research. The results revealed a surprising unfamiliarity with the NIH guidelines. Many of the perceived challenges to the effective implementation of best practices (<i>i.e.</i>, those designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility) were similarly noted as a challenge to effective provision of support services in a core setting. Further, most cores routinely use best practices and offer services that support rigor and reproducibility. These services include access to well-maintained instrumentation and training on experimental design and data analysis as well as data management. Feedback from this survey will enable the ABRF to build better educational resources and share critical best-practice guidelines. These resources will become important tools to the core community and the researchers they serve to impact rigor and transparency across the range of science and technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","volume":"30 3","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657953/pdf/jbt.30-36.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin L Knudtson, Robert H Carnahan, Rebecca L Hegstad-Davies, Nancy C Fisher, Belynda Hicks, Peter A Lopez, Susan M Meyn, Sheenah M Mische, Frances Weis-Garcia, Lisa D White, Katia Sol-Church\",\"doi\":\"10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shared scientific resources, also known as core facilities, support a significant portion of the research conducted at biomolecular research institutions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) established the Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CCoRRe) to further its mission of integrating advanced technologies, education, and communication in the operations of shared scientific resources in support of reproducible research. In order to first assess the needs of the scientific shared resource community, the CCoRRe solicited feedback from ABRF members <i>via</i> a survey. The purpose of the survey was to gain information on how U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives on advancing scientific rigor and reproducibility influenced current services and new technology development. In addition, the survey aimed to identify the challenges and opportunities related to implementation of new reporting requirements and to identify new practices and resources needed to ensure rigorous research. The results revealed a surprising unfamiliarity with the NIH guidelines. Many of the perceived challenges to the effective implementation of best practices (<i>i.e.</i>, those designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility) were similarly noted as a challenge to effective provision of support services in a core setting. Further, most cores routinely use best practices and offer services that support rigor and reproducibility. These services include access to well-maintained instrumentation and training on experimental design and data analysis as well as data management. Feedback from this survey will enable the ABRF to build better educational resources and share critical best-practice guidelines. These resources will become important tools to the core community and the researchers they serve to impact rigor and transparency across the range of science and technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"36-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657953/pdf/jbt.30-36.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.19-3003-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享的科学资源,也称为核心设施,支持生物分子研究机构进行的大部分研究。生物分子资源设施协会(ABRF)成立了核心刚性和可复制性委员会(CCoRRe),以进一步推进其使命,即将先进技术、教育和通信整合到共享科学资源的运营中,以支持可复制研究。为了首先评估科学共享资源社区的需求,CCoRRe通过一项调查征求了ABRF成员的反馈意见。这项调查的目的是了解美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)在提高科学严谨性和再现性方面的举措如何影响当前的服务和新技术开发。此外,调查旨在确定与执行新的报告要求有关的挑战和机遇,并确定确保严格研究所需的新做法和资源。研究结果显示,人们对美国国立卫生研究院指南的不熟悉程度令人惊讶。有效实施最佳做法(即那些旨在确保严谨性和可重复性的做法)所面临的许多挑战也被视为在核心环境中有效提供支助服务的挑战。此外,大多数核心通常使用最佳实践,并提供支持严谨性和可重复性的服务。这些服务包括获得维护良好的仪器,以及实验设计、数据分析和数据管理方面的培训。这项调查的反馈将使ABRF能够建立更好的教育资源,并分享关键的最佳实践指南。这些资源将成为核心社区和他们所服务的研究人员的重要工具,以影响科学技术领域的严谨性和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survey on Scientific Shared Resource Rigor and Reproducibility.

Shared scientific resources, also known as core facilities, support a significant portion of the research conducted at biomolecular research institutions. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) established the Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CCoRRe) to further its mission of integrating advanced technologies, education, and communication in the operations of shared scientific resources in support of reproducible research. In order to first assess the needs of the scientific shared resource community, the CCoRRe solicited feedback from ABRF members via a survey. The purpose of the survey was to gain information on how U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiatives on advancing scientific rigor and reproducibility influenced current services and new technology development. In addition, the survey aimed to identify the challenges and opportunities related to implementation of new reporting requirements and to identify new practices and resources needed to ensure rigorous research. The results revealed a surprising unfamiliarity with the NIH guidelines. Many of the perceived challenges to the effective implementation of best practices (i.e., those designed to ensure rigor and reproducibility) were similarly noted as a challenge to effective provision of support services in a core setting. Further, most cores routinely use best practices and offer services that support rigor and reproducibility. These services include access to well-maintained instrumentation and training on experimental design and data analysis as well as data management. Feedback from this survey will enable the ABRF to build better educational resources and share critical best-practice guidelines. These resources will become important tools to the core community and the researchers they serve to impact rigor and transparency across the range of science and technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article Watch: July, 2024. Improved Yield of SPRI Beads-Based Size Selection in the Very High Molecular Weight Range. Protein Expression Autoinduction in a Cold-Shock Expression System in Escherichia coli. Article Watch: April, 2024. Core Exchange: A Professional Development Program for Shared Resource Personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1