腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺活检:乳腺癌症分期的可靠诊断工具。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Cytopathology Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1002/cncy.22770
Luai Sallout MD, Mohamed Tashkandi MD, Amani Moqnas CT(IAC), Hebah AlMajed CT(IAC), Abdulrhman Al-Naeem MD, Yazeed Alwelaie MD, FRCPC
{"title":"腋窝淋巴结细针穿刺活检:乳腺癌症分期的可靠诊断工具。","authors":"Luai Sallout MD,&nbsp;Mohamed Tashkandi MD,&nbsp;Amani Moqnas CT(IAC),&nbsp;Hebah AlMajed CT(IAC),&nbsp;Abdulrhman Al-Naeem MD,&nbsp;Yazeed Alwelaie MD, FRCPC","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) samples is crucial for axillary staging in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Patients with pathologic evidence of nodal metastasis scheduled for upfront surgery typically also undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Although SLNB is the gold standard method for detecting nodal metastasis, axillary lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) utility has not been thoroughly explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node FNAB samples along with concurrent ipsilateral breast tissue samples were searched and reviewed. The control group included histologic findings of axillary dissection or intraoperative SLNB results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 354 axillary lymph node FNAB samples with matched histology were included. Of these, 187 (52.8%) were positive for metastatic carcinoma of breast origin; 143 (40.4%) were negative for metastasis; 12 (3.4%) showed atypical cells; six (1.7%) were suspicious for metastasis; and six (1.7%) were nondiagnostic because of a lack of lymphoid tissue and malignant cells. Of the 143 negative FNAB samples, 22 (15.4%) were positive on either intraoperative SLNB or ALND. When only the positive and negative FNAB samples were accounted for (<i>n</i> = 330; 93.2%), overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 89.4% and 99.2%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although axillary SLNB is the standard procedure for detecting nodal metastasis of breast origin, axillary lymph node FNAB appears to be a suitable alternative in a significant proportion of patients. A standard SLNB should be performed in cases of negative axillary lymph node FNAB findings, particularly nodes with abnormal imaging findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes: A reliable diagnostic tool for breast cancer staging\",\"authors\":\"Luai Sallout MD,&nbsp;Mohamed Tashkandi MD,&nbsp;Amani Moqnas CT(IAC),&nbsp;Hebah AlMajed CT(IAC),&nbsp;Abdulrhman Al-Naeem MD,&nbsp;Yazeed Alwelaie MD, FRCPC\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncy.22770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) samples is crucial for axillary staging in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Patients with pathologic evidence of nodal metastasis scheduled for upfront surgery typically also undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Although SLNB is the gold standard method for detecting nodal metastasis, axillary lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) utility has not been thoroughly explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node FNAB samples along with concurrent ipsilateral breast tissue samples were searched and reviewed. The control group included histologic findings of axillary dissection or intraoperative SLNB results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 354 axillary lymph node FNAB samples with matched histology were included. Of these, 187 (52.8%) were positive for metastatic carcinoma of breast origin; 143 (40.4%) were negative for metastasis; 12 (3.4%) showed atypical cells; six (1.7%) were suspicious for metastasis; and six (1.7%) were nondiagnostic because of a lack of lymphoid tissue and malignant cells. Of the 143 negative FNAB samples, 22 (15.4%) were positive on either intraoperative SLNB or ALND. When only the positive and negative FNAB samples were accounted for (<i>n</i> = 330; 93.2%), overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 89.4% and 99.2%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although axillary SLNB is the standard procedure for detecting nodal metastasis of breast origin, axillary lymph node FNAB appears to be a suitable alternative in a significant proportion of patients. A standard SLNB should be performed in cases of negative axillary lymph node FNAB findings, particularly nodes with abnormal imaging findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22770\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)样本的病理学评估对于新诊断的癌症患者的腋窝分期至关重要。有淋巴结转移病理证据的患者计划进行前期手术,通常也要进行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。尽管SLNB是检测淋巴结转移的金标准方法,但腋窝淋巴结细针抽吸活检(FNAB)的实用性尚未得到彻底探索。方法:对超声引导下腋窝淋巴结FNAB样本以及同期同侧乳腺组织样本进行检索和回顾。对照组包括腋窝解剖的组织学表现或术中SLNB结果。结果:共纳入354份组织学匹配的腋窝淋巴结FNAB样本。其中187例(52.8%)为乳腺转移癌阳性;转移阴性143例(40.4%);非典型细胞12例(3.4%);6例(1.7%)可疑转移;6例(1.7%)因缺乏淋巴组织和恶性细胞而未被诊断。在143个阴性FNAB样本中,22个(15.4%)在术中SLNB或ALND中呈阳性。当仅考虑阳性和阴性FNAB样本时(n=330;93.2%),总体诊断敏感性和特异性分别为89.4%和99.2%。结论:尽管腋窝SLNB是检测乳腺源性淋巴结转移的标准方法,但在相当大比例的患者中,腋窝淋巴结FNAB似乎是一种合适的替代方法。如果腋窝淋巴结FNAB检查结果为阴性,特别是影像学检查结果异常的淋巴结,应进行标准的SLNB检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes: A reliable diagnostic tool for breast cancer staging

Background

Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) samples is crucial for axillary staging in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Patients with pathologic evidence of nodal metastasis scheduled for upfront surgery typically also undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Although SLNB is the gold standard method for detecting nodal metastasis, axillary lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) utility has not been thoroughly explored.

Methods

Ultrasound-guided axillary lymph node FNAB samples along with concurrent ipsilateral breast tissue samples were searched and reviewed. The control group included histologic findings of axillary dissection or intraoperative SLNB results.

Results

A total of 354 axillary lymph node FNAB samples with matched histology were included. Of these, 187 (52.8%) were positive for metastatic carcinoma of breast origin; 143 (40.4%) were negative for metastasis; 12 (3.4%) showed atypical cells; six (1.7%) were suspicious for metastasis; and six (1.7%) were nondiagnostic because of a lack of lymphoid tissue and malignant cells. Of the 143 negative FNAB samples, 22 (15.4%) were positive on either intraoperative SLNB or ALND. When only the positive and negative FNAB samples were accounted for (n = 330; 93.2%), overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 89.4% and 99.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although axillary SLNB is the standard procedure for detecting nodal metastasis of breast origin, axillary lymph node FNAB appears to be a suitable alternative in a significant proportion of patients. A standard SLNB should be performed in cases of negative axillary lymph node FNAB findings, particularly nodes with abnormal imaging findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
期刊最新文献
Research and scholarly mentoring: A guide for pathology faculty and program directors. Utility and performance of cell blocks in cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Experience at two teaching hospitals. Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. The Milan system atypia of undetermined significance: 5-year performance data. Cytomorphologic and molecular characterization of spindle cell carcinoid tumors of the lung.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1