多发病患者基于需求的生活质量和自我感知的健康不平等的测量项目生成:多发病率问卷(MMQ)的开发。

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S427183
Kristine Henderson Bissenbakker, Anne Møller, Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson, John Brandt Brodersen
{"title":"多发病患者基于需求的生活质量和自我感知的健康不平等的测量项目生成:多发病率问卷(MMQ)的开发。","authors":"Kristine Henderson Bissenbakker,&nbsp;Anne Møller,&nbsp;Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson,&nbsp;John Brandt Brodersen","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S427183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the processes of developing domains and items for the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ), a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We developed items and domains for the MMQ through 17 qualitative content validity questionnaire interviews with adults with multimorbidity by testing items from an item bank (covering items with content inspired by existing Needs-based QoL measures for single diseases). The interviews alternated between an explorative part and more focused cognitive interview techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Testing the 47 items from the first draft of the MMQ items showed that the Needs-based approach as a framework did not cover all the QoL aspects our informants stated as being important. Therefore, the conceptual framework was supplemented by Self-perceived health inequity, and new items were generated. MMQ, measuring Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2), was assembled. MMQ1 covers the domains: \"Physical ability\" (10 items), \"Limitations in everyday life\" (15 items), \"Worries\" (11 items), \"My social life\" (11 items), \"Self-image\" (12 items), and \"Personal finances\" (2 items). Self-perceived health inequity proved to be a relevant framework for other aspects of QoL not covered by the Needs-based approach to QoL. MMQ2 covers the domains: \"Experiences of being stigmatized\" (five items), \"Experiences of not being seen and heard\" (four items), \"Insufficient understanding of the burden of disease\" (three items) and \"Experiences of feeling powerless\" (five items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed the final MMQ draft, a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2) with high content validity (regarding content relevance and comprehensiveness). The final MMQ draft will be assessed for its psychometric properties using Modern Test Theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/fa/prom-14-269.PMC10576455.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generating Items for Measuring Needs-Based Quality of Life and Self-Perceived Health Inequity in Patients with Multimorbidity: Development of the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ).\",\"authors\":\"Kristine Henderson Bissenbakker,&nbsp;Anne Møller,&nbsp;Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson,&nbsp;John Brandt Brodersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PROM.S427183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the processes of developing domains and items for the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ), a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We developed items and domains for the MMQ through 17 qualitative content validity questionnaire interviews with adults with multimorbidity by testing items from an item bank (covering items with content inspired by existing Needs-based QoL measures for single diseases). The interviews alternated between an explorative part and more focused cognitive interview techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Testing the 47 items from the first draft of the MMQ items showed that the Needs-based approach as a framework did not cover all the QoL aspects our informants stated as being important. Therefore, the conceptual framework was supplemented by Self-perceived health inequity, and new items were generated. MMQ, measuring Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2), was assembled. MMQ1 covers the domains: \\\"Physical ability\\\" (10 items), \\\"Limitations in everyday life\\\" (15 items), \\\"Worries\\\" (11 items), \\\"My social life\\\" (11 items), \\\"Self-image\\\" (12 items), and \\\"Personal finances\\\" (2 items). Self-perceived health inequity proved to be a relevant framework for other aspects of QoL not covered by the Needs-based approach to QoL. MMQ2 covers the domains: \\\"Experiences of being stigmatized\\\" (five items), \\\"Experiences of not being seen and heard\\\" (four items), \\\"Insufficient understanding of the burden of disease\\\" (three items) and \\\"Experiences of feeling powerless\\\" (five items).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed the final MMQ draft, a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2) with high content validity (regarding content relevance and comprehensiveness). The final MMQ draft will be assessed for its psychometric properties using Modern Test Theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/fa/prom-14-269.PMC10576455.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S427183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S427183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:描述多发病率问卷(MMQ)领域和项目的开发过程,用于评估基于需求的生活质量的多发病特异性PROM。患者和方法:我们通过测试项目库中的项目(包括受现有基于需求的单一疾病生活质量测量启发的内容的项目),对患有多发病的成年人进行了17次定性内容有效性问卷访谈,从而开发了MMQ的项目和领域。访谈在探索性部分和更专注的认知访谈技巧之间交替进行。结果:对MMQ项目初稿中的47个项目进行测试表明,作为一个框架的基于需求的方法并没有涵盖我们的信息提供者所说的所有重要的生活质量方面。因此,概念框架得到了自我感知的健康不平等的补充,并产生了新的项目。MMQ,测量基于需求的生活质量(MMQ1)和自我感知的健康不公平(MMQ2)。MMQ1涵盖了以下领域:“身体能力”(10项)、“日常生活的局限性”(15项)、《担忧》(11项),“我的社交生活”(11条)、“自我形象”(12项)和“个人财务”(2项)。自我感知的健康不公平被证明是生活质量的其他方面的相关框架,而基于需求的生活质量方法没有涵盖这些方面。MMQ2涵盖了以下领域:“被污名化的经历”(五项)、“不被看到和听到的经历”,用于评估基于需求的生活质量(MMQ1)和自我感知健康不公平(MMQ2)的多病特异性PROM,具有高内容有效性(关于内容相关性和全面性)。MMQ最终草案将使用现代测试理论对其心理测量特性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generating Items for Measuring Needs-Based Quality of Life and Self-Perceived Health Inequity in Patients with Multimorbidity: Development of the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ).

Purpose: To describe the processes of developing domains and items for the MultiMorbidity Questionnaire (MMQ), a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL.

Patients and methods: We developed items and domains for the MMQ through 17 qualitative content validity questionnaire interviews with adults with multimorbidity by testing items from an item bank (covering items with content inspired by existing Needs-based QoL measures for single diseases). The interviews alternated between an explorative part and more focused cognitive interview techniques.

Results: Testing the 47 items from the first draft of the MMQ items showed that the Needs-based approach as a framework did not cover all the QoL aspects our informants stated as being important. Therefore, the conceptual framework was supplemented by Self-perceived health inequity, and new items were generated. MMQ, measuring Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2), was assembled. MMQ1 covers the domains: "Physical ability" (10 items), "Limitations in everyday life" (15 items), "Worries" (11 items), "My social life" (11 items), "Self-image" (12 items), and "Personal finances" (2 items). Self-perceived health inequity proved to be a relevant framework for other aspects of QoL not covered by the Needs-based approach to QoL. MMQ2 covers the domains: "Experiences of being stigmatized" (five items), "Experiences of not being seen and heard" (four items), "Insufficient understanding of the burden of disease" (three items) and "Experiences of feeling powerless" (five items).

Conclusion: We have developed the final MMQ draft, a multimorbidity-specific PROM for the assessment of Needs-based QoL (MMQ1) and Self-perceived health inequity (MMQ2) with high content validity (regarding content relevance and comprehensiveness). The final MMQ draft will be assessed for its psychometric properties using Modern Test Theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and Content Validation of the Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment - Real-World (PQAT-RW): An Instrument to Evaluate Benefits and Disadvantages of Treatments in Real-World Settings. Exploring Barriers to Effective COVID-19 Risk Mitigation, Recovery, and Chronic Disease Self-Management: A Qualitative Multilevel Perspective. Ultra-Low Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Breast Imaging vs DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis): A Patient-Reported Outcome Study. Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Sinhala Translation of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1