专家是怎样的专家?意大利家庭暴力情况下的儿童监护权评估。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Violence and Victims Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1891/VV-2021-0041
Mariachiara Feresin, Marianna Santonocito
{"title":"专家是怎样的专家?意大利家庭暴力情况下的儿童监护权评估。","authors":"Mariachiara Feresin,&nbsp;Marianna Santonocito","doi":"10.1891/VV-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent decades, scholars and professionals have investigated the courts' treatment of mothers and children who claim that an ex-partner/father is abusive, especially in child custody proceedings. In Italy, Laws 54/2006 and 154/2013 established that joint-custody and coparenting are critical to ensure the best interest of the child. In the process of custody determination, judges can appoint an expert to assess parenting skills. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the knowledge, opinions, and practices of the Court-Appointed Experts (CAEs) in child custody disputes in cases involving allegations of domestic violence (DV). Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 15 CAEs; the interviews' transcripts were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results suggested that in the management of child custody cases, most CAEs showed: strong prejudices against women victims of DV, who were often blamed and/or secondarily victimized; adherence to controversial models (e.g., parental alienation syndrome) and characterization of mothers as \"alienators\"; poor knowledge of DV and relevant laws. CAEs' overlooking DV underlines the urgent need to develop and implement guidelines on child custody decision-making in the context of DV.</p>","PeriodicalId":48139,"journal":{"name":"Violence and Victims","volume":" ","pages":"664-679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Expert Are the Experts? Child Custody Evaluations in Situations of Domestic Violence in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Mariachiara Feresin,&nbsp;Marianna Santonocito\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/VV-2021-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent decades, scholars and professionals have investigated the courts' treatment of mothers and children who claim that an ex-partner/father is abusive, especially in child custody proceedings. In Italy, Laws 54/2006 and 154/2013 established that joint-custody and coparenting are critical to ensure the best interest of the child. In the process of custody determination, judges can appoint an expert to assess parenting skills. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the knowledge, opinions, and practices of the Court-Appointed Experts (CAEs) in child custody disputes in cases involving allegations of domestic violence (DV). Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 15 CAEs; the interviews' transcripts were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results suggested that in the management of child custody cases, most CAEs showed: strong prejudices against women victims of DV, who were often blamed and/or secondarily victimized; adherence to controversial models (e.g., parental alienation syndrome) and characterization of mothers as \\\"alienators\\\"; poor knowledge of DV and relevant laws. CAEs' overlooking DV underlines the urgent need to develop and implement guidelines on child custody decision-making in the context of DV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence and Victims\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"664-679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence and Victims\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2021-0041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence and Victims","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2021-0041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,学者和专业人士调查了法院对声称前伴侣/父亲虐待的母亲和儿童的待遇,尤其是在儿童监护诉讼中。在意大利,第54/2006号和第154/2013号法律规定,共同监护权和共同负担对确保儿童的最大利益至关重要。在监护权的确定过程中,法官可以任命一名专家来评估育儿技能。这项定性研究的目的是调查法院指定专家在涉及家庭暴力指控的案件中对儿童监护权纠纷的了解、意见和做法。对15名CAE进行了半结构化的面对面访谈;采用定性内容分析法对访谈笔录进行分析。结果表明,在儿童监护案件的管理中,大多数CAE表现出:对DV的女性受害者有强烈的偏见,她们经常受到指责和/或二次受害;坚持有争议的模式(如父母疏远综合症),并将母亲定性为“疏远者”;对DV和相关法律了解不足。CAEs忽视DV强调迫切需要制定和实施DV背景下的儿童监护决策指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Expert Are the Experts? Child Custody Evaluations in Situations of Domestic Violence in Italy.

In recent decades, scholars and professionals have investigated the courts' treatment of mothers and children who claim that an ex-partner/father is abusive, especially in child custody proceedings. In Italy, Laws 54/2006 and 154/2013 established that joint-custody and coparenting are critical to ensure the best interest of the child. In the process of custody determination, judges can appoint an expert to assess parenting skills. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the knowledge, opinions, and practices of the Court-Appointed Experts (CAEs) in child custody disputes in cases involving allegations of domestic violence (DV). Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 15 CAEs; the interviews' transcripts were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results suggested that in the management of child custody cases, most CAEs showed: strong prejudices against women victims of DV, who were often blamed and/or secondarily victimized; adherence to controversial models (e.g., parental alienation syndrome) and characterization of mothers as "alienators"; poor knowledge of DV and relevant laws. CAEs' overlooking DV underlines the urgent need to develop and implement guidelines on child custody decision-making in the context of DV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Violence and Victims
Violence and Victims CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: We all face the difficult problem of understanding and treating the perpetrators and victims of violence behavior. Violence and Victims is the evidence-based resource that informs clinical decisions, legal actions, and public policy. Now celebrating its 25th year, Violence and Victims is a peer-reviewed journal of theory, research, policy, and clinical practice in the area of interpersonal violence and victimization. It seeks to facilitate the exchange of information on this subject across such professional disciplines as psychology, sociology, criminology, law, medicine, nursing, psychiatry, and social work.
期刊最新文献
Animals as Covictims and More-Than-Property: The Inclusion of Companion Animals in Protection Order Statutes at the State Level in the United States. Can Witnessing Domestic Violence Predict Risky Health Behaviors of University Students? Mass-Shooting Survivors: Advancing Research and Practice. Working With Youth Who Have Experienced Commercial Sexual Exploitation: Voices From the Field. Religious Coping Styles Used by Young Black Women Who Experience DatingViolence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1