奖励可以加速冲突中目标导向行动的准备工作。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02072
Tyler J Adkins, Taraz G Lee
{"title":"奖励可以加速冲突中目标导向行动的准备工作。","authors":"Tyler J Adkins, Taraz G Lee","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our goals sometimes conflict with our prepotent habitual responses, which often leads to impaired performance on a variety of tasks. People are better at exerting cognitive control to overcome prepotent and automatic responses when they are motivated by the prospect of reward. The standard experimental paradigms used to study this phenomenon examine free RTs that allow participants to select a variety of response strategies including delaying response initiation to avoid committing errors. However, this approach makes it difficult to determine which control processes are affected by reward. Does reward lead to improved performance via the inhibition of prepotent responses or the facilitation of goal-directed processing? Here, we use a forced-response paradigm to fix response initiation and systematically vary the time available for the cognitive processing necessary for response preparation. Using a probabilistic model that dissociates the preparation of habitual and goal-directed responses, we obtain evidence across multiple experiments (n = 87 people) that reward selectively accelerates the preparation of goal-directed actions in the context of conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"2831-2846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reward Accelerates the Preparation of Goal-directed Actions under Conflict.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler J Adkins, Taraz G Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jocn_a_02072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our goals sometimes conflict with our prepotent habitual responses, which often leads to impaired performance on a variety of tasks. People are better at exerting cognitive control to overcome prepotent and automatic responses when they are motivated by the prospect of reward. The standard experimental paradigms used to study this phenomenon examine free RTs that allow participants to select a variety of response strategies including delaying response initiation to avoid committing errors. However, this approach makes it difficult to determine which control processes are affected by reward. Does reward lead to improved performance via the inhibition of prepotent responses or the facilitation of goal-directed processing? Here, we use a forced-response paradigm to fix response initiation and systematically vary the time available for the cognitive processing necessary for response preparation. Using a probabilistic model that dissociates the preparation of habitual and goal-directed responses, we obtain evidence across multiple experiments (n = 87 people) that reward selectively accelerates the preparation of goal-directed actions in the context of conflict.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2831-2846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标有时与我们荒谬的习惯性反应相冲突,这往往会导致我们在各种任务中的表现受损。当人们被奖励的前景所激励时,他们更善于运用认知控制来克服先验和自动的反应。用于研究这一现象的标准实验范式检查了自由RT,允许参与者选择各种反应策略,包括延迟反应启动以避免犯错误。然而,这种方法使得很难确定哪些控制过程受到奖励的影响。奖励是否通过抑制前置反应或促进目标导向的处理来提高绩效?在这里,我们使用强迫反应范式来固定反应启动,并系统地改变反应准备所需的认知处理的可用时间。使用一个将习惯性反应和目标导向反应的准备分离开来的概率模型,我们在多个实验(n=87人)中获得了证据,证明奖励选择性地加速了冲突背景下目标导向行动的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reward Accelerates the Preparation of Goal-directed Actions under Conflict.

Our goals sometimes conflict with our prepotent habitual responses, which often leads to impaired performance on a variety of tasks. People are better at exerting cognitive control to overcome prepotent and automatic responses when they are motivated by the prospect of reward. The standard experimental paradigms used to study this phenomenon examine free RTs that allow participants to select a variety of response strategies including delaying response initiation to avoid committing errors. However, this approach makes it difficult to determine which control processes are affected by reward. Does reward lead to improved performance via the inhibition of prepotent responses or the facilitation of goal-directed processing? Here, we use a forced-response paradigm to fix response initiation and systematically vary the time available for the cognitive processing necessary for response preparation. Using a probabilistic model that dissociates the preparation of habitual and goal-directed responses, we obtain evidence across multiple experiments (n = 87 people) that reward selectively accelerates the preparation of goal-directed actions in the context of conflict.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
Reward Accelerates the Preparation of Goal-directed Actions under Conflict. Amygdalar Excitation of Hippocampal Interneurons Can Lead to Emotion-driven Overgeneralization of Context. Real Face Value: The Processing of Naturalistic Facial Expressions in the Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex. The Laboratory of Brain and Cognition: A Brief History. Understanding Cortical Streams from a Computational Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1