梗死后室间隔破裂治疗的当前临床实践:一项欧洲调查。

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2023-09-22 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oead091
Daniele Ronco, Albert Ariza-Solé, Mariusz Kowalewski, Matteo Matteucci, Michele Di Mauro, Esteban López-de-Sá, Marco Ranucci, Alessandro Sionis, Nikolaos Bonaros, Michele De Bonis, Claudio Francesco Russo, Aitor Uribarri, Santiago Montero, Theodor Fischlein, Adam Kowalówka, Shiho Naito, Jean-François Obadia, Roberto Martín-Asenjo, Jaime Aboal, Matthias Thielmann, Caterina Simon, Rut Andrea-Riba, Carolina Parra, Thierry Folliguet, Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Marcelo Sanmartín Fernández, Nawwar Al-Attar, Ana Viana Tejedor, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino, Virginia Burgos Palacios, Udo Boeken, Sergio Raposeiras Roubin, Miguel Antonio Solla Buceta, Pedro Luis Sánchez Fernández, Roberto Scrofani, Gemma Pastor Báez, Pablo Jorge Pérez, Guglielmo Actis Dato, Juan Carlos Garcia-Rubira, Jose H de Gea Garcia, Giulio Massimi, Andrea Musazzi, Roberto Lorusso
{"title":"梗死后室间隔破裂治疗的当前临床实践:一项欧洲调查。","authors":"Daniele Ronco,&nbsp;Albert Ariza-Solé,&nbsp;Mariusz Kowalewski,&nbsp;Matteo Matteucci,&nbsp;Michele Di Mauro,&nbsp;Esteban López-de-Sá,&nbsp;Marco Ranucci,&nbsp;Alessandro Sionis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Bonaros,&nbsp;Michele De Bonis,&nbsp;Claudio Francesco Russo,&nbsp;Aitor Uribarri,&nbsp;Santiago Montero,&nbsp;Theodor Fischlein,&nbsp;Adam Kowalówka,&nbsp;Shiho Naito,&nbsp;Jean-François Obadia,&nbsp;Roberto Martín-Asenjo,&nbsp;Jaime Aboal,&nbsp;Matthias Thielmann,&nbsp;Caterina Simon,&nbsp;Rut Andrea-Riba,&nbsp;Carolina Parra,&nbsp;Thierry Folliguet,&nbsp;Manuel Martínez-Sellés,&nbsp;Marcelo Sanmartín Fernández,&nbsp;Nawwar Al-Attar,&nbsp;Ana Viana Tejedor,&nbsp;Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino,&nbsp;Virginia Burgos Palacios,&nbsp;Udo Boeken,&nbsp;Sergio Raposeiras Roubin,&nbsp;Miguel Antonio Solla Buceta,&nbsp;Pedro Luis Sánchez Fernández,&nbsp;Roberto Scrofani,&nbsp;Gemma Pastor Báez,&nbsp;Pablo Jorge Pérez,&nbsp;Guglielmo Actis Dato,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Garcia-Rubira,&nbsp;Jose H de Gea Garcia,&nbsp;Giulio Massimi,&nbsp;Andrea Musazzi,&nbsp;Roberto Lorusso","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/aa/oead091.PMC10568658.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Ronco,&nbsp;Albert Ariza-Solé,&nbsp;Mariusz Kowalewski,&nbsp;Matteo Matteucci,&nbsp;Michele Di Mauro,&nbsp;Esteban López-de-Sá,&nbsp;Marco Ranucci,&nbsp;Alessandro Sionis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Bonaros,&nbsp;Michele De Bonis,&nbsp;Claudio Francesco Russo,&nbsp;Aitor Uribarri,&nbsp;Santiago Montero,&nbsp;Theodor Fischlein,&nbsp;Adam Kowalówka,&nbsp;Shiho Naito,&nbsp;Jean-François Obadia,&nbsp;Roberto Martín-Asenjo,&nbsp;Jaime Aboal,&nbsp;Matthias Thielmann,&nbsp;Caterina Simon,&nbsp;Rut Andrea-Riba,&nbsp;Carolina Parra,&nbsp;Thierry Folliguet,&nbsp;Manuel Martínez-Sellés,&nbsp;Marcelo Sanmartín Fernández,&nbsp;Nawwar Al-Attar,&nbsp;Ana Viana Tejedor,&nbsp;Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino,&nbsp;Virginia Burgos Palacios,&nbsp;Udo Boeken,&nbsp;Sergio Raposeiras Roubin,&nbsp;Miguel Antonio Solla Buceta,&nbsp;Pedro Luis Sánchez Fernández,&nbsp;Roberto Scrofani,&nbsp;Gemma Pastor Báez,&nbsp;Pablo Jorge Pérez,&nbsp;Guglielmo Actis Dato,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Garcia-Rubira,&nbsp;Jose H de Gea Garcia,&nbsp;Giulio Massimi,&nbsp;Andrea Musazzi,&nbsp;Roberto Lorusso\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/aa/oead091.PMC10568658.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多历史和最近的报道表明,梗死后室间隔破裂(VSR)是一种危及生命的疾病,最佳治疗策略尚不明确。因此,经常描述不同中心之间不同的治疗政策,结果各不相同。我们分析了欧洲中心的数据,以了解VSR管理的当前临床实践。方法和结果:来自8个欧洲国家的39个中心参加了一项调查,在2022年4月至10月期间填写了38个问题的数字表格,以收集有关VSR治疗各个方面的信息。大多数中心每年遇到1-5例VSR病例。手术仍然是经皮封堵术的首选治疗方法(71.8%对28.2%)。延迟修复是首选方法(87.2%)。血流动力学状况几乎影响所有中心的管理,尽管有些中心甚至在心源性休克时也试图实现患者的稳定和延迟手术。尽管33.3%的中心没有对不稳定患者进行冠状动脉造影,但血运重建方法存在很大差异。大多数中心采用机械循环支持(MCS),主要是体外膜肺氧合,尤其是术前,以稳定患者并实现延迟修复。术后,这种MCS更常用于心室功能障碍患者。结论:在现实生活中,无论血液动力学状况如何,延迟手术都是欧洲VSR治疗的首选策略。体外膜肺氧合正成为最常用的MCS作为操作的桥梁。这项调查为开展专门的前瞻性研究提供了有用的背景,以加强VSR治疗的现有证据,并帮助改善其目前不令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey.

Aims: Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management.

Methods and results: Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Conclusion: In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source. Intra-individual variability in lipoprotein(a): the value of a repeat measure for reclassifying individuals at intermediate risk. New data allow to better understand the secrets of lipoprotein(a): is that for sure? Correction to: Correlates and consequences of atrial fibrillation in a prospective study of 25 000 participants in the China Kadoorie Biobank. Colchicine for cardiovascular and limb risk reduction in Medicare beneficiaries with peripheral artery disease: emulation of target trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1