罗伯特·雷纳,社会民主犯罪学

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology Pub Date : 2022-05-09 DOI:10.1177/14624745221101122
David Brown
{"title":"罗伯特·雷纳,社会民主犯罪学","authors":"David Brown","doi":"10.1177/14624745221101122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clair arrived at the summary statement as a way of explaining why privileged clients had not cultivated any significant legal expertize and therefore deferred to their attorneys, but the passage reads as though privileged clients were simply too busy making all the right decisions in life—“going to doctor’s appointments” and what not—to get into trouble with the law, and by implication, Clair seems to be offering an indictment of choices made by disadvantaged clients. Again, Clair’s data does not support this claim. The privileged had plenty of run-ins with law enforcement, and as some of Clair’s clients explained, they benefitted from networks that included ties to influential legal officials, financial resources to purchase a better quality of defense, and white privilege. Chapter 4 deals with the complexities of criminal defense from the viewpoint of defense attorneys. This is my favorite chapter though my read is that too often Clair presented defense attorney perspectives in an uncritical way. Again, clients act; courtroom officials respond. Nevertheless, in chapter 4 we learn defense attorneys (a) take exception to being challenged by disadvantaged clients; (b) are as concerned about maintaining a professional identity in the eyes of judges and prosecutors as they are about using every legal strategy available to their clients; (c) determine legal strategies by judicial habits; and (d) sometimes give less effort in cases where they suspect the client may be facing too many of life’s problems to fully participate in their own case. In short, justice may take a backseat to courtroom culture and professional tensions, and “disadvantaged” clients may be justified in their legal cynicism and “withdrawal.” Chapter 5 is a conclusion with now customary policy recommendations. Overall, Privilege and Punishment makes some compelling arguments, and instructors should find the book useful in courses on courts, criminal justice inequalities, organizational culture, and professional-client relationships.","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robert Reiner, Social Democratic Criminology\",\"authors\":\"David Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14624745221101122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clair arrived at the summary statement as a way of explaining why privileged clients had not cultivated any significant legal expertize and therefore deferred to their attorneys, but the passage reads as though privileged clients were simply too busy making all the right decisions in life—“going to doctor’s appointments” and what not—to get into trouble with the law, and by implication, Clair seems to be offering an indictment of choices made by disadvantaged clients. Again, Clair’s data does not support this claim. The privileged had plenty of run-ins with law enforcement, and as some of Clair’s clients explained, they benefitted from networks that included ties to influential legal officials, financial resources to purchase a better quality of defense, and white privilege. Chapter 4 deals with the complexities of criminal defense from the viewpoint of defense attorneys. This is my favorite chapter though my read is that too often Clair presented defense attorney perspectives in an uncritical way. Again, clients act; courtroom officials respond. Nevertheless, in chapter 4 we learn defense attorneys (a) take exception to being challenged by disadvantaged clients; (b) are as concerned about maintaining a professional identity in the eyes of judges and prosecutors as they are about using every legal strategy available to their clients; (c) determine legal strategies by judicial habits; and (d) sometimes give less effort in cases where they suspect the client may be facing too many of life’s problems to fully participate in their own case. In short, justice may take a backseat to courtroom culture and professional tensions, and “disadvantaged” clients may be justified in their legal cynicism and “withdrawal.” Chapter 5 is a conclusion with now customary policy recommendations. Overall, Privilege and Punishment makes some compelling arguments, and instructors should find the book useful in courses on courts, criminal justice inequalities, organizational culture, and professional-client relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221101122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745221101122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

克莱尔在总结声明中解释了为什么特权客户没有培养出任何重要的法律专业知识,因此听从了他们的律师,但这段话读起来好像特权客户只是太忙了,忙于做出生活中所有正确的决定——“去看医生”和其他什么——而没有触犯法律,克莱尔似乎在控诉弱势客户的选择。同样,克莱尔的数据并不支持这一说法。特权阶层与执法部门有很多冲突,正如克莱尔的一些客户所解释的那样,他们从网络中受益,这些网络包括与有影响力的法律官员的联系、购买更高质量国防的财政资源,以及白人特权。第四章从辩护律师的角度论述刑事辩护的复杂性。这是我最喜欢的一章,尽管我读到克莱尔经常以不加批判的方式呈现辩护律师的观点。同样,客户采取行动;法庭官员作出回应。然而,在第4章中,我们了解到辩护律师(a)对弱势客户的质疑持异议;(b) 关心在法官和检察官眼中保持职业身份,就像他们关心使用客户可用的每一种法律策略一样;(c) 通过司法习惯确定法律策略;以及(d)在他们怀疑客户可能面临太多生活问题而无法完全参与自己的案件的情况下,有时会减少努力。简言之,司法可能会在法庭文化和职业紧张局势中退居次要地位,“弱势”客户的法律玩世不恭和“退出”可能是合理的。第五章是一个结论,现在有了习惯性的政策建议。总的来说,《特权与惩罚》提出了一些令人信服的论点,教师应该发现这本书在法庭、刑事司法不平等、组织文化和职业客户关系等课程中很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robert Reiner, Social Democratic Criminology
Clair arrived at the summary statement as a way of explaining why privileged clients had not cultivated any significant legal expertize and therefore deferred to their attorneys, but the passage reads as though privileged clients were simply too busy making all the right decisions in life—“going to doctor’s appointments” and what not—to get into trouble with the law, and by implication, Clair seems to be offering an indictment of choices made by disadvantaged clients. Again, Clair’s data does not support this claim. The privileged had plenty of run-ins with law enforcement, and as some of Clair’s clients explained, they benefitted from networks that included ties to influential legal officials, financial resources to purchase a better quality of defense, and white privilege. Chapter 4 deals with the complexities of criminal defense from the viewpoint of defense attorneys. This is my favorite chapter though my read is that too often Clair presented defense attorney perspectives in an uncritical way. Again, clients act; courtroom officials respond. Nevertheless, in chapter 4 we learn defense attorneys (a) take exception to being challenged by disadvantaged clients; (b) are as concerned about maintaining a professional identity in the eyes of judges and prosecutors as they are about using every legal strategy available to their clients; (c) determine legal strategies by judicial habits; and (d) sometimes give less effort in cases where they suspect the client may be facing too many of life’s problems to fully participate in their own case. In short, justice may take a backseat to courtroom culture and professional tensions, and “disadvantaged” clients may be justified in their legal cynicism and “withdrawal.” Chapter 5 is a conclusion with now customary policy recommendations. Overall, Privilege and Punishment makes some compelling arguments, and instructors should find the book useful in courses on courts, criminal justice inequalities, organizational culture, and professional-client relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Punishment & Society is an international, interdisciplinary, peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research and scholarship dealing with punishment, penal institutions and penal control.
期刊最新文献
Scott-Hayward, Christine S. and Henry F. Fradella, Punishing Poverty: How Bail and Pretrial Detention Fuel Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System Tasseli McKay, Megan Comfort, Christine Lindquist, & Anupa Bir, Holding On: Family and Fatherhood During Incarceration and Reentry The exercise of authority during interactions in custody hearings in São Paulo (Brazil): Building legitimacy through exclusion Barry Goldson, Chris Cunneen, Sophie Russell, David Brown, Eileen Baldry, Melanie Schwartz, and Damon Briggs, Youth Justice and Penality in Comparative Context Writing from the flesh: A response to my interlocutors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1