获得医疗保健是了解COVID-19结果地理分布的重要调节变量——来自波兰的初步见解

A. Jarynowski, V. Belik
{"title":"获得医疗保健是了解COVID-19结果地理分布的重要调节变量——来自波兰的初步见解","authors":"A. Jarynowski, V. Belik","doi":"10.31373/ejtcm/147842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Biases in the measurement of COVID-19 burden and the uncertainty in estimation of the corresponding epidemiologic indexes are known and common phenomena in infectious diseases. We investigated to what extent healthcare access (HCA)-related supply/demand interfered with the registered data on COVID-19 in Poland. Material and Methods: We ran a multiple linear regression model with interactions to explain the geographic variation in seroprevalence, hospitalizations (on the voivodeship - NUTS-2 level) and current (beginning of the 4th wave of COVID cases - 15.09-21.11.2021) case notifications/crude mortality (on poviat - old NUTS-4 level). We took vaccination coverage and cumulative case notifications up to the so called 3rd wave as predictor variables and supply/demand (HCA) as moderating variables. Results: HCA with interacting terms (mainly demand) explained to the great extent the variance of current incidence and most of the variance in the current mortality rates. HCA (mainly supply) was significantly moderating cumulative case notifications until the 3rd wave of cases, thus explaining the variance in seroprevalence and hospitalization. Conclusion: Seeking causal relations between the vaccination- or infection-gained immunity level and the current infection dynamics could be misleading without understanding the socio-epidemiologic context such as the moderating role of HCA (sensu lato). After quantification, HCA could be incorporated into epidemiologic models for improved prediction of the actual disease burden. Copyright © Medical University of Gdańsk.","PeriodicalId":52409,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to healthcare as an important moderating variable for understanding geography of COVID-19 outcomes – preliminary insights from Poland\",\"authors\":\"A. Jarynowski, V. Belik\",\"doi\":\"10.31373/ejtcm/147842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Biases in the measurement of COVID-19 burden and the uncertainty in estimation of the corresponding epidemiologic indexes are known and common phenomena in infectious diseases. We investigated to what extent healthcare access (HCA)-related supply/demand interfered with the registered data on COVID-19 in Poland. Material and Methods: We ran a multiple linear regression model with interactions to explain the geographic variation in seroprevalence, hospitalizations (on the voivodeship - NUTS-2 level) and current (beginning of the 4th wave of COVID cases - 15.09-21.11.2021) case notifications/crude mortality (on poviat - old NUTS-4 level). We took vaccination coverage and cumulative case notifications up to the so called 3rd wave as predictor variables and supply/demand (HCA) as moderating variables. Results: HCA with interacting terms (mainly demand) explained to the great extent the variance of current incidence and most of the variance in the current mortality rates. HCA (mainly supply) was significantly moderating cumulative case notifications until the 3rd wave of cases, thus explaining the variance in seroprevalence and hospitalization. Conclusion: Seeking causal relations between the vaccination- or infection-gained immunity level and the current infection dynamics could be misleading without understanding the socio-epidemiologic context such as the moderating role of HCA (sensu lato). After quantification, HCA could be incorporated into epidemiologic models for improved prediction of the actual disease burden. Copyright © Medical University of Gdańsk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31373/ejtcm/147842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31373/ejtcm/147842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在传染病中,测量COVID-19负担的偏差和相应流行病学指标估计的不确定性是已知和常见的现象。我们调查了波兰与医疗保健获取(HCA)相关的供应/需求对COVID-19注册数据的干扰程度。材料和方法:我们运行了一个具有相互作用的多元线性回归模型,以解释血清患病率、住院率(在省级- NUTS-2水平)和当前(第四波COVID - 19病例开始- 15.09-21.11.2021)病例报告/原始死亡率(在省级- NUTS-4水平)的地理差异。我们将疫苗接种覆盖率和累计病例报告作为预测变量,并将供需(HCA)作为调节变量。结果:具有交互项(主要是需求项)的HCA在很大程度上解释了当前发病率的差异,在很大程度上解释了当前死亡率的差异。在第三波病例出现之前,HCA(主要是供应)显著减缓了累计病例通报,从而解释了血清患病率和住院率的差异。结论:在不了解社会流行病学背景(如HCA的调节作用)的情况下,寻求疫苗接种或感染获得的免疫水平与当前感染动态之间的因果关系可能会产生误导。量化后,HCA可纳入流行病学模型,以改进对实际疾病负担的预测。版权所有©医科大学Gdańsk。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to healthcare as an important moderating variable for understanding geography of COVID-19 outcomes – preliminary insights from Poland
Introduction: Biases in the measurement of COVID-19 burden and the uncertainty in estimation of the corresponding epidemiologic indexes are known and common phenomena in infectious diseases. We investigated to what extent healthcare access (HCA)-related supply/demand interfered with the registered data on COVID-19 in Poland. Material and Methods: We ran a multiple linear regression model with interactions to explain the geographic variation in seroprevalence, hospitalizations (on the voivodeship - NUTS-2 level) and current (beginning of the 4th wave of COVID cases - 15.09-21.11.2021) case notifications/crude mortality (on poviat - old NUTS-4 level). We took vaccination coverage and cumulative case notifications up to the so called 3rd wave as predictor variables and supply/demand (HCA) as moderating variables. Results: HCA with interacting terms (mainly demand) explained to the great extent the variance of current incidence and most of the variance in the current mortality rates. HCA (mainly supply) was significantly moderating cumulative case notifications until the 3rd wave of cases, thus explaining the variance in seroprevalence and hospitalization. Conclusion: Seeking causal relations between the vaccination- or infection-gained immunity level and the current infection dynamics could be misleading without understanding the socio-epidemiologic context such as the moderating role of HCA (sensu lato). After quantification, HCA could be incorporated into epidemiologic models for improved prediction of the actual disease burden. Copyright © Medical University of Gdańsk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
His bundle pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and heart failure with non-reduced ejection fraction – retrospective study An echocardiographic tool for the interatrial conduction disorders – old dog, new tricks? Reeducation of the Upper Limb: A Case Study of a Multiple Trauma Patient, Who Suffered a Car Accident Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in Elderly Patient with Colorectal Cancer and Peritoneal Metastasis Inoperable Optic Pathway Glioma: A Seven-Year-Old Male with >35 Years Overall Survival Following Treatment with Antineoplastons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1