欧盟的卖空监管:评估ESMA禁止卖空的授权

M. Huhtilainen
{"title":"欧盟的卖空监管:评估ESMA禁止卖空的授权","authors":"M. Huhtilainen","doi":"10.17979/EJGE.2017.6.1.4321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Tabla normal\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0cm; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:none; \n font-size:11.0pt; \n font-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif; \n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; \n mso-ansi-language:EN-US; \n mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} \n This paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE","PeriodicalId":37945,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Government and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Short Selling Regulation in the EU: Assessing the Authorization Granted for ESMA to Prohibit Short Selling\",\"authors\":\"M. Huhtilainen\",\"doi\":\"10.17979/EJGE.2017.6.1.4321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \\n table.MsoNormalTable \\n {mso-style-name:\\\"Tabla normal\\\"; \\n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \\n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \\n mso-style-noshow:yes; \\n mso-style-priority:99; \\n mso-style-parent:\\\"\\\"; \\n mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; \\n mso-para-margin:0cm; \\n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \\n mso-pagination:none; \\n font-size:11.0pt; \\n font-family:\\\"Calibri\\\",sans-serif; \\n mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; \\n mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; \\n mso-ansi-language:EN-US; \\n mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} \\n This paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE\",\"PeriodicalId\":37945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Government and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Government and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17979/EJGE.2017.6.1.4321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17979/EJGE.2017.6.1.4321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了欧盟重新制定的卖空法规(欧盟第236/2012号法规)。重点是关于在特殊市场情况下禁止卖空的规定。《条例》进一步规定了报告和披露空头头寸的某些义务。结论是,禁止卖空并不是遏制极端价格波动的有效工具。差分回归和重复测量GLM用于测试卖空禁令是否成功遏制了2011-2013年连续两次被禁止的西班牙和意大利股票的波动。结果与之前的大多数研究一致,表明卖空约束在降低波动性方面的有效性充其量是有限的。此外,有证据表明会产生反作用:卖空限制实际上可能会增加波动性,并恶化流动性。然而,根据理论和以往的研究,如果报告和披露要求能够提高市场效率以及监管机构的监管工作,则应优先考虑这些要求。正常0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE/*样式定义*/table。MsoNormalTable,无衬线体;mso-ascii font-family:宋体;mso-ascii主题字体:小拉丁文;mso-hansi font-family:宋体;mso-hansi主题字体:小拉丁文;mso-ansi语言:EN-US;mso-fareast语言:EN-US;}本文讨论了欧盟重新制定的卖空法规(欧盟第236/2012号法规)。重点是关于在特殊市场情况下禁止卖空的规定。《条例》进一步规定了报告和披露空头头寸的某些义务。结论是,禁止卖空并不是遏制极端价格波动的有效工具。差分回归和重复测量GLM用于测试卖空禁令是否成功遏制了2011-2013年连续两次被禁止的西班牙和意大利股票的波动。结果与之前的大多数研究一致,表明卖空约束在降低波动性方面的有效性充其量是有限的。此外,有证据表明会产生反作用:卖空限制实际上可能会增加波动性,并恶化流动性。然而,根据理论和以往的研究,如果报告和披露要求能够提高市场效率以及监管机构的监管工作,则应优先考虑这些要求。正常0 21假假假ES X-NONE X-NONE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Short Selling Regulation in the EU: Assessing the Authorization Granted for ESMA to Prohibit Short Selling
The paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:none; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-ansi-language:EN-US; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} This paper discusses the renewed short selling regulation (Regulation (EU) No 236/2012) in the European Union. The focus is on the provisions that deal with prohibiting short selling in exceptional market circumstances. The Regulation further enforces certain obligations to report and disclose short positions. It is concluded that banning short selling is not an effective tool to contain extreme price volatility. The difference-in-differences regression and repeated measures GLM were used to test whether short selling bans were successful in containing volatility of those Spanish and Italian stocks that were subject to two back-to-back prohibitions during the years 2011-2013. The results are consistent with the majority of previous research, suggesting that the effectiveness of short sale constraints in reducing volatility is limited at best. Furthermore, there are evidence of counterproductive effects: constraints on short selling may actually increase volatility as well as deteriorate liquidity. However, based on theory and previous studies, reporting and disclosure requirements shall be favored provided they improve market efficiency as well as supervisory work of regulatory bodies. Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Government and Economics
European Journal of Government and Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE) is an international academic journal for peer reviewed research on all aspects of government and economics. EJGE is particularly interested in current issues regarding the interrelationship between the fields of government and economics, from the influence of government on the economy (economic policy) to economic explanations of government (public choice). It is also particularly interested in questions directly or indirectly related to Europe.
期刊最新文献
Democracy, governance, and environmental policy effectiveness: a cross-country analysis with Sustainable Governance Indicators Public-private partnerships caught in a trust-trap and the potential role of information: the burden of divergent rationales Exploring citizen participation in fiscal control: insights from Manizales, Colombia Tourism, growth, and carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa: a balancing act Impact of government quality on post-COVID subjective well-being in Pakistan: the mediating role of financial stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1