没有人可以聚集的聚会空间:新冠肺炎时代的艺术和社区第三位

Q2 Social Sciences Built Environment Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.2148/benv.48.1.48
J. Parker
{"title":"没有人可以聚集的聚会空间:新冠肺炎时代的艺术和社区第三位","authors":"J. Parker","doi":"10.2148/benv.48.1.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do art and community spaces look like when no one can use them to gather? Academic research into neighbourhoods and urban art scenes have focused on the power of such spaces to bring people together. Using the framework of Oldenburg's notion of 'third places', sociologists have\n recognized the importance of places like art galleries, bars, restaurants, coff ee shops, and anywhere else people gather in providing a physical site of orientation outside work and the home for people to be together and communities to amalgamate. While there have always been critiques of\n such places and their role in urban space, e.g.their part in gentri fication and potential displacement, positive accounts of their role in neighbourhood life have typically focused on their ability to draw people together, so a situation like the current pandemic – when such gatherings\n are forestalled – raises an obvious question about their current utility. Using two case studies on the South Side of Chicago, this paper leverages interview data with merchants involved with sociallyengaged commercial spaces to examine some of the ways that community spaces in Chicago\n shifted in light of the pandemic. The article concludes with policy and theoretical considerations based on these case studies, extrapolating lessons beyond the South Side of Chicago. Speci fically, it suggests that in addition to off ering limited versions of their traditional facilitation\n of physical co-presence, art and community third places can also leverage their importance in social networks to help distribute information and resources.","PeriodicalId":53715,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment","volume":"105 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gathering Spaces When No One Can Gather: Art and Community Third Places in the Age of Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"J. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.2148/benv.48.1.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What do art and community spaces look like when no one can use them to gather? Academic research into neighbourhoods and urban art scenes have focused on the power of such spaces to bring people together. Using the framework of Oldenburg's notion of 'third places', sociologists have\\n recognized the importance of places like art galleries, bars, restaurants, coff ee shops, and anywhere else people gather in providing a physical site of orientation outside work and the home for people to be together and communities to amalgamate. While there have always been critiques of\\n such places and their role in urban space, e.g.their part in gentri fication and potential displacement, positive accounts of their role in neighbourhood life have typically focused on their ability to draw people together, so a situation like the current pandemic – when such gatherings\\n are forestalled – raises an obvious question about their current utility. Using two case studies on the South Side of Chicago, this paper leverages interview data with merchants involved with sociallyengaged commercial spaces to examine some of the ways that community spaces in Chicago\\n shifted in light of the pandemic. The article concludes with policy and theoretical considerations based on these case studies, extrapolating lessons beyond the South Side of Chicago. Speci fically, it suggests that in addition to off ering limited versions of their traditional facilitation\\n of physical co-presence, art and community third places can also leverage their importance in social networks to help distribute information and resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"105 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.1.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.1.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当没有人可以使用艺术和社区空间聚集时,它们会是什么样子?对街区和城市艺术场景的学术研究集中在这些空间将人们聚集在一起的力量上。利用奥尔登堡“第三方”概念的框架,社会学家已经认识到美术馆、酒吧、餐馆、咖啡店和人们聚集的任何其他地方的重要性,这些地方为人们提供了一个工作之外的物理定位场所和家,让人们聚在一起,让社区融合。尽管人们一直对这些地方及其在城市空间中的作用提出批评,例如它们在绅士化和潜在流离失所中的作用,但对它们在邻里生活中的作用的积极描述通常集中在它们将人们聚集在一起的能力上,因此,像当前疫情这样的情况——当此类集会被阻止时——引发了一个关于其当前效用的明显问题。本文利用芝加哥南区的两个案例研究,利用对参与社交商业空间的商人的采访数据,研究芝加哥社区空间在疫情下的一些变化方式。文章最后以这些案例研究为基础,从芝加哥南区以外的地区推断出政策和理论考虑。特别是,它表明,除了打破传统的物理共存便利化的有限版本外,艺术和社区第三方还可以利用它们在社交网络中的重要性来帮助分发信息和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gathering Spaces When No One Can Gather: Art and Community Third Places in the Age of Covid-19
What do art and community spaces look like when no one can use them to gather? Academic research into neighbourhoods and urban art scenes have focused on the power of such spaces to bring people together. Using the framework of Oldenburg's notion of 'third places', sociologists have recognized the importance of places like art galleries, bars, restaurants, coff ee shops, and anywhere else people gather in providing a physical site of orientation outside work and the home for people to be together and communities to amalgamate. While there have always been critiques of such places and their role in urban space, e.g.their part in gentri fication and potential displacement, positive accounts of their role in neighbourhood life have typically focused on their ability to draw people together, so a situation like the current pandemic – when such gatherings are forestalled – raises an obvious question about their current utility. Using two case studies on the South Side of Chicago, this paper leverages interview data with merchants involved with sociallyengaged commercial spaces to examine some of the ways that community spaces in Chicago shifted in light of the pandemic. The article concludes with policy and theoretical considerations based on these case studies, extrapolating lessons beyond the South Side of Chicago. Speci fically, it suggests that in addition to off ering limited versions of their traditional facilitation of physical co-presence, art and community third places can also leverage their importance in social networks to help distribute information and resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Built Environment
Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Carceral Displacement: The Root Shock of Mass Criminalization Displacement in Place: Root Shock in the Pearse Street Community, Dublin Root Shock's Missing Appendix Using Situation Analysis for Critical Policy Studies and Beyond Root Shock as Social Discipline Marginalization and Racism in Irish Social, Asylum, and Refugee Policies 'We Couldn't Get the Big Win' A Situation Analysis of the Stress of Gentrification at Differing Points in the Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1