选择和使用数据和环境进行学习

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Statistics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1111/test.12338
H. MacGillivray
{"title":"选择和使用数据和环境进行学习","authors":"H. MacGillivray","doi":"10.1111/test.12338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value for student statistical learning and engagement of real data and real contexts has been stated and established for so long and so thoroughly by statisticians and statistics educators that it is almost superfluous to restate it. Over the last twenty-five years, there has also been increasing emphasis on the importance of using complex real data. Initially the emphasis was in terms of data with a number of variables, whether the data are to be collected by students or accessed, but alongside rapidly growing technological advances and their incorporation in teaching statistics, advocacy for complexity has broadened to encompass large datasets, many variables, datasets already collected that need wrangling or “treatment” before teaching, or non-traditional data. In parallel with emphasis on real data and contexts, there has also been advocacy on critiquing reports on data and data-based commentary and analysis in the media or in accounts in other disciplines. Real, complex data and real contexts provide opportunities for rich and authentic statistical learning, but are not without a range of challenges and the need for careful thought and sound expertise in statistics and its learning for those teaching statistics, especially at the introductory level. Often discussion of teacher planning and pedagogy focuses on the data and its nature, but challenges can also feature significantly in context, required curricula and externally-imposed constraints on student time and assessments. Contexts in particular require careful selection and thought, especially at foundation and introductory level. Contexts must be readily accessible to the relevant student cohort so that they provide a suitable vehicle for statistical learning. If a context requires more than basic understanding from students or if a context is too dominant, authentic statistical learning is inhibited by context learning or by non-transferability of learning. In designing learning experiences, learning purpose embeds content, pedagogical structure and external constraints, the last of which can be considerably restrictive at school, tertiary or workplace levels. Good context and data choice must therefore take account of the student cohort in regard to both prior and current learning, and discipline situation. All those who have been involved in choosing contexts and datasets know how much work is involved in preparation of them for student use, even for extra-curricular open-ended investigations without curricula and assessment restrictions. Preparing good classroom-ready learning resources within a given curriculum requires significant statistical and teaching expertise. Those involved in teaching statistics into other disciplines at tertiary level know the diplomacy and combined knowledge of students and statistics required to balance the desires and demands of other disciplines, as well as students' and institutional restrictions on time and assessments. Contexts with datasets suggested by serviced disciplines are too often unsuitable for their students due to overly-complicated or advanced discipline-based contexts with limited data learning potential. In addition, the approach desired by researchers in any discipline can be a top-down, casestudy type of approach rather than a student-driven investigative type of approach. However, despite all the challenges, contexts and data relevant to students' lives or their program of study are invaluable in their engagement and learning potential, provided the criteria above are met. Hence reports on resources, pedagogies, strategies and research therein that meet such criteria, provided the student cohort, teaching situation, curricula and learning experience circumstances are well-described, are of value for all those teaching statistics. In this issue, we have five papers reporting on such in different student and teaching situations, and a paper discussing an in-depth research study comparing effects of static and interactive visualisation. In [2], the contexts are a number of media reports on COVID-19, two of which made waves within the students' own country, and a third which attracted international attention. The contexts are carefully chosen to enable students to apply worry questions such as in [3] to develop statistical literacy in context. Anyone who has given students in introductory statistics a free hand in choosing a context to investigate, knows how sporting data can be as attractive to students as it can be difficult for them to understand the statistical challenges and pitfalls in the way of researching what they want, which is often associated with individual stars or successful teams. In [6], a scraped and organised dataset using the US National Basketball Association (NBA) Legends dataset, with R code provided for those who DOI: 10.1111/test.12338","PeriodicalId":43739,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing and using data and contexts for learning\",\"authors\":\"H. MacGillivray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/test.12338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The value for student statistical learning and engagement of real data and real contexts has been stated and established for so long and so thoroughly by statisticians and statistics educators that it is almost superfluous to restate it. Over the last twenty-five years, there has also been increasing emphasis on the importance of using complex real data. Initially the emphasis was in terms of data with a number of variables, whether the data are to be collected by students or accessed, but alongside rapidly growing technological advances and their incorporation in teaching statistics, advocacy for complexity has broadened to encompass large datasets, many variables, datasets already collected that need wrangling or “treatment” before teaching, or non-traditional data. In parallel with emphasis on real data and contexts, there has also been advocacy on critiquing reports on data and data-based commentary and analysis in the media or in accounts in other disciplines. Real, complex data and real contexts provide opportunities for rich and authentic statistical learning, but are not without a range of challenges and the need for careful thought and sound expertise in statistics and its learning for those teaching statistics, especially at the introductory level. Often discussion of teacher planning and pedagogy focuses on the data and its nature, but challenges can also feature significantly in context, required curricula and externally-imposed constraints on student time and assessments. Contexts in particular require careful selection and thought, especially at foundation and introductory level. Contexts must be readily accessible to the relevant student cohort so that they provide a suitable vehicle for statistical learning. If a context requires more than basic understanding from students or if a context is too dominant, authentic statistical learning is inhibited by context learning or by non-transferability of learning. In designing learning experiences, learning purpose embeds content, pedagogical structure and external constraints, the last of which can be considerably restrictive at school, tertiary or workplace levels. Good context and data choice must therefore take account of the student cohort in regard to both prior and current learning, and discipline situation. All those who have been involved in choosing contexts and datasets know how much work is involved in preparation of them for student use, even for extra-curricular open-ended investigations without curricula and assessment restrictions. Preparing good classroom-ready learning resources within a given curriculum requires significant statistical and teaching expertise. Those involved in teaching statistics into other disciplines at tertiary level know the diplomacy and combined knowledge of students and statistics required to balance the desires and demands of other disciplines, as well as students' and institutional restrictions on time and assessments. Contexts with datasets suggested by serviced disciplines are too often unsuitable for their students due to overly-complicated or advanced discipline-based contexts with limited data learning potential. In addition, the approach desired by researchers in any discipline can be a top-down, casestudy type of approach rather than a student-driven investigative type of approach. However, despite all the challenges, contexts and data relevant to students' lives or their program of study are invaluable in their engagement and learning potential, provided the criteria above are met. Hence reports on resources, pedagogies, strategies and research therein that meet such criteria, provided the student cohort, teaching situation, curricula and learning experience circumstances are well-described, are of value for all those teaching statistics. In this issue, we have five papers reporting on such in different student and teaching situations, and a paper discussing an in-depth research study comparing effects of static and interactive visualisation. In [2], the contexts are a number of media reports on COVID-19, two of which made waves within the students' own country, and a third which attracted international attention. The contexts are carefully chosen to enable students to apply worry questions such as in [3] to develop statistical literacy in context. Anyone who has given students in introductory statistics a free hand in choosing a context to investigate, knows how sporting data can be as attractive to students as it can be difficult for them to understand the statistical challenges and pitfalls in the way of researching what they want, which is often associated with individual stars or successful teams. In [6], a scraped and organised dataset using the US National Basketball Association (NBA) Legends dataset, with R code provided for those who DOI: 10.1111/test.12338\",\"PeriodicalId\":43739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

统计学家和统计教育工作者长期以来一直在阐述和确立学生统计学习以及参与真实数据和真实环境的价值,因此重申这一点几乎是多余的。在过去的25年里,人们也越来越强调使用复杂真实数据的重要性。最初,重点是具有多个变量的数据,无论这些数据是由学生收集还是访问,但随着技术的快速发展及其在教学统计中的应用,对复杂性的倡导已经扩大到包括大型数据集、许多变量、在教学前需要争论或“处理”的已经收集的数据集,或非传统数据。在强调真实数据和背景的同时,还倡导对媒体或其他学科的报道中的数据和基于数据的评论和分析进行批评。真实、复杂的数据和真实的背景为丰富和真实的统计学习提供了机会,但也并非没有一系列挑战,需要对统计学及其学习进行仔细思考和健全的专业知识,尤其是在入门级。关于教师规划和教学法的讨论通常集中在数据及其性质上,但挑战也可能在背景、所需课程以及外部对学生时间和评估的限制方面具有重要意义。上下文尤其需要仔细选择和思考,尤其是在基础和介绍层面。相关学生群体必须能够容易地获取上下文,以便为统计学习提供合适的工具。如果一个语境需要学生的基本理解,或者语境过于主导,那么真实的统计学习会被语境学习或学习的不可转移性所抑制。在设计学习体验时,学习目的嵌入了内容、教学结构和外部约束,最后一个约束在学校、高等教育或工作场所可能会受到相当大的限制。因此,良好的背景和数据选择必须考虑到学生群体先前和当前的学习以及学科情况。所有参与选择背景和数据集的人都知道,即使是在没有课程和评估限制的课外开放式调查中,为学生使用这些数据集做准备也需要做多少工作。在给定的课程中准备良好的课堂学习资源需要大量的统计和教学专业知识。那些参与在高等教育其他学科教授统计学的人知道平衡其他学科的愿望和需求所需的外交和学生与统计学的综合知识,以及学生和机构对时间和评估的限制。具有服务学科建议的数据集的上下文往往不适合学生,因为过于复杂或基于学科的高级上下文具有有限的数据学习潜力。此外,任何学科的研究人员所希望的方法都可以是自上而下的案例研究类型的方法,而不是学生驱动的调查类型的方法。然而,尽管存在所有挑战,但只要满足上述标准,与学生生活或学习计划相关的背景和数据对他们的参与度和学习潜力是非常宝贵的。因此,关于符合这些标准的资源、教学法、战略和研究的报告,只要能很好地描述学生群体、教学情况、课程和学习经历,对所有这些教学统计数据都有价值。在本期中,我们有五篇论文在不同的学生和教学情况下报道了这一点,还有一篇论文讨论了一项深入的研究,比较了静态和交互式可视化的效果。在[2]中,背景是许多关于新冠肺炎的媒体报道,其中两篇在学生本国引起了轰动,第三篇引起了国际关注。仔细选择上下文,使学生能够应用[3]中的担忧问题,在上下文中发展统计素养。任何一个让入门统计学专业的学生自由选择调查背景的人都知道,体育数据对学生来说是多么有吸引力,因为他们很难理解研究自己想要什么的统计挑战和陷阱,而这通常与个别明星或成功的团队有关。在[6]中,一个使用美国国家篮球协会(NBA)传奇数据集的拼凑和组织数据集,为DOI:10.1111/test.12338的人提供了R代码
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choosing and using data and contexts for learning
The value for student statistical learning and engagement of real data and real contexts has been stated and established for so long and so thoroughly by statisticians and statistics educators that it is almost superfluous to restate it. Over the last twenty-five years, there has also been increasing emphasis on the importance of using complex real data. Initially the emphasis was in terms of data with a number of variables, whether the data are to be collected by students or accessed, but alongside rapidly growing technological advances and their incorporation in teaching statistics, advocacy for complexity has broadened to encompass large datasets, many variables, datasets already collected that need wrangling or “treatment” before teaching, or non-traditional data. In parallel with emphasis on real data and contexts, there has also been advocacy on critiquing reports on data and data-based commentary and analysis in the media or in accounts in other disciplines. Real, complex data and real contexts provide opportunities for rich and authentic statistical learning, but are not without a range of challenges and the need for careful thought and sound expertise in statistics and its learning for those teaching statistics, especially at the introductory level. Often discussion of teacher planning and pedagogy focuses on the data and its nature, but challenges can also feature significantly in context, required curricula and externally-imposed constraints on student time and assessments. Contexts in particular require careful selection and thought, especially at foundation and introductory level. Contexts must be readily accessible to the relevant student cohort so that they provide a suitable vehicle for statistical learning. If a context requires more than basic understanding from students or if a context is too dominant, authentic statistical learning is inhibited by context learning or by non-transferability of learning. In designing learning experiences, learning purpose embeds content, pedagogical structure and external constraints, the last of which can be considerably restrictive at school, tertiary or workplace levels. Good context and data choice must therefore take account of the student cohort in regard to both prior and current learning, and discipline situation. All those who have been involved in choosing contexts and datasets know how much work is involved in preparation of them for student use, even for extra-curricular open-ended investigations without curricula and assessment restrictions. Preparing good classroom-ready learning resources within a given curriculum requires significant statistical and teaching expertise. Those involved in teaching statistics into other disciplines at tertiary level know the diplomacy and combined knowledge of students and statistics required to balance the desires and demands of other disciplines, as well as students' and institutional restrictions on time and assessments. Contexts with datasets suggested by serviced disciplines are too often unsuitable for their students due to overly-complicated or advanced discipline-based contexts with limited data learning potential. In addition, the approach desired by researchers in any discipline can be a top-down, casestudy type of approach rather than a student-driven investigative type of approach. However, despite all the challenges, contexts and data relevant to students' lives or their program of study are invaluable in their engagement and learning potential, provided the criteria above are met. Hence reports on resources, pedagogies, strategies and research therein that meet such criteria, provided the student cohort, teaching situation, curricula and learning experience circumstances are well-described, are of value for all those teaching statistics. In this issue, we have five papers reporting on such in different student and teaching situations, and a paper discussing an in-depth research study comparing effects of static and interactive visualisation. In [2], the contexts are a number of media reports on COVID-19, two of which made waves within the students' own country, and a third which attracted international attention. The contexts are carefully chosen to enable students to apply worry questions such as in [3] to develop statistical literacy in context. Anyone who has given students in introductory statistics a free hand in choosing a context to investigate, knows how sporting data can be as attractive to students as it can be difficult for them to understand the statistical challenges and pitfalls in the way of researching what they want, which is often associated with individual stars or successful teams. In [6], a scraped and organised dataset using the US National Basketball Association (NBA) Legends dataset, with R code provided for those who DOI: 10.1111/test.12338
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Statistics
Teaching Statistics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Community of teaching practice informed by the discipline and scholarship Visualizing statistical edutainment: What you see is what you get Authors' response to Michael Martin Media Covid misinformation due to confounding Reducing statistics anxiety and academic procrastination among Israeli students: A pilot program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1